Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage on noncontrast head CT: An accuracy, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2024.02.002
Anass Benomar , Jose Danilo B. Diestro , Houssam Darabid , Karim Saydy , Lora Tzaneva , Jimmy Li , Eleyine Zarour , William Tanguay , Nohad El Sayed , Igor Gomes Padilha , Laurent Létourneau-Guillon , Céline Bard , Kristoff Nelson , Alain Weill , Daniel Roy , Johanna Eneling , William Boisseau , Thanh N. Nguyen , Mohamad Abdalkader , Ahmed A. Najjar , Jean Raymond
{"title":"Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage on noncontrast head CT: An accuracy, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability study","authors":"Anass Benomar ,&nbsp;Jose Danilo B. Diestro ,&nbsp;Houssam Darabid ,&nbsp;Karim Saydy ,&nbsp;Lora Tzaneva ,&nbsp;Jimmy Li ,&nbsp;Eleyine Zarour ,&nbsp;William Tanguay ,&nbsp;Nohad El Sayed ,&nbsp;Igor Gomes Padilha ,&nbsp;Laurent Létourneau-Guillon ,&nbsp;Céline Bard ,&nbsp;Kristoff Nelson ,&nbsp;Alain Weill ,&nbsp;Daniel Roy ,&nbsp;Johanna Eneling ,&nbsp;William Boisseau ,&nbsp;Thanh N. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Mohamad Abdalkader ,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Najjar ,&nbsp;Jean Raymond","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (NAPSAH) on Noncontrast Head CT (NCCT) between numerous raters.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>45 NCCT of adult patients with SAH who also had a catheter angiography (CA) were independently evaluated by 48 diverse raters; 45 raters performed a second assessment one month later. For each case, raters were asked: 1) whether they judged the bleeding pattern to be perimesencephalic; 2) whether there was blood anterior to brainstem; 3) complete filling of the anterior interhemispheric fissure (AIF); 4) extension to the lateral part of the sylvian fissure (LSF); 5) frank intraventricular hemorrhage; 6) whether in the hypothetical presence of a negative CT angiogram they would still recommend CA. An automatic NAPSAH diagnosis was also generated by combining responses to questions 2–5. Reliability was estimated using Gwet's AC1 (κ<sub>G</sub>), and the relationship between the NCCT diagnosis of NAPSAH and the recommendation to perform CA using Cramer's V test. Multi-rater accuracy of NCCT in predicting negative CA was explored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inter-rater reliability for the presence of NAPSAH was moderate (κ<em><sub>G</sub></em> = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.47, 0.69), but improved to substantial when automatically generated (κ<em><sub>G</sub></em> = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.81). The most reliable criteria were the absence of AIF filling (κ<em><sub>G</sub></em> = 0.79) and extension to LSF (κ<em><sub>G</sub></em> = 0.79). Mean intra-rater reliability was substantial (κ<em><sub>G</sub></em> = 0.65). NAPSAH weakly correlated with CA decision (<em>V</em> = 0.50). Mean sensitivity and specificity were 58% (95%CI: 44%, 71%) and 83 % (95%CI: 72 %, 94%), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NAPSAH remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The NCCT diagnosis was moderately reliable and its impact on clinical decisions modest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986124000920/pdfft?md5=15930984f80634591e5f600cbaf203fa&pid=1-s2.0-S0150986124000920-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986124000920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (NAPSAH) on Noncontrast Head CT (NCCT) between numerous raters.

Materials and methods

45 NCCT of adult patients with SAH who also had a catheter angiography (CA) were independently evaluated by 48 diverse raters; 45 raters performed a second assessment one month later. For each case, raters were asked: 1) whether they judged the bleeding pattern to be perimesencephalic; 2) whether there was blood anterior to brainstem; 3) complete filling of the anterior interhemispheric fissure (AIF); 4) extension to the lateral part of the sylvian fissure (LSF); 5) frank intraventricular hemorrhage; 6) whether in the hypothetical presence of a negative CT angiogram they would still recommend CA. An automatic NAPSAH diagnosis was also generated by combining responses to questions 2–5. Reliability was estimated using Gwet's AC1 (κG), and the relationship between the NCCT diagnosis of NAPSAH and the recommendation to perform CA using Cramer's V test. Multi-rater accuracy of NCCT in predicting negative CA was explored.

Results

Inter-rater reliability for the presence of NAPSAH was moderate (κG = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.47, 0.69), but improved to substantial when automatically generated (κG = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.81). The most reliable criteria were the absence of AIF filling (κG = 0.79) and extension to LSF (κG = 0.79). Mean intra-rater reliability was substantial (κG = 0.65). NAPSAH weakly correlated with CA decision (V = 0.50). Mean sensitivity and specificity were 58% (95%CI: 44%, 71%) and 83 % (95%CI: 72 %, 94%), respectively.

Conclusion

NAPSAH remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The NCCT diagnosis was moderately reliable and its impact on clinical decisions modest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非对比头部 CT 上的非动脉瘤性脑周蛛网膜下腔出血:准确性、评分者之间和评分者内部可靠性研究
材料和方法48名不同的评定者对45例同时进行导管血管造影(CA)的SAH成人患者的NCCT进行了独立评估;45名评定者在一个月后进行了第二次评估。对于每个病例,评定者都会被问到:1)他们是否判断出血模式为脑周出血;2)脑干前方是否有出血;3)大脑半球间前裂(AIF)是否完全充盈;4)是否扩展到颅裂(LSF)的外侧部分;5)是否有明显的脑室内出血;6)如果假设 CT 血管造影结果为阴性,他们是否仍建议进行 CA。结合对问题 2-5 的回答,还可自动生成 NAPSAH 诊断。采用Gwet's AC1 (κG)估计信度,采用Cramer's V检验估计NCCT诊断NAPSAH与建议进行CA之间的关系。结果NAPSAH存在与否的评分者间可靠性为中度(κG = 0.58;95%CI:0.47,0.69),但在自动生成时,可靠性提高到了相当高的水平(κG = 0.70;95%CI:0.59,0.81)。最可靠的标准是无 AIF 填充(κG = 0.79)和扩展到 LSF(κG = 0.79)。评分者内部的平均可靠性相当高(κG = 0.65)。NAPSAH与CA决策的相关性较弱(V = 0.50)。平均敏感性和特异性分别为 58% (95%CI: 44%, 71%) 和 83% (95%CI: 72%, 94%)。NCCT 诊断的可靠性一般,对临床决策的影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Progressive T1 high-intensity plaques in carotid stenosis: Comparative MRI analyses in asymptomatic and symptomatic phases of low-grade stenosis Using the sandwich technique for the treatment of sigmoid sinus diverticulum causing pulsatile tinnitus Assessment of large-scale imaging practices in patients with acute brain hemorrhage in French emergency departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1