A Robust Framework for fraud Detection in Banking using ML and NN

IF 0.8 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s40010-024-00871-1
Astha Vashistha, Anoop Kumar Tiwari, Priyanshi Singh, Paritosh Kumar Yadav, Sudhakar Pandey
{"title":"A Robust Framework for fraud Detection in Banking using ML and NN","authors":"Astha Vashistha,&nbsp;Anoop Kumar Tiwari,&nbsp;Priyanshi Singh,&nbsp;Paritosh Kumar Yadav,&nbsp;Sudhakar Pandey","doi":"10.1007/s40010-024-00871-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Banking fraud is a problem that is becoming more and more serious, along with considerable monetary losses, damage to the bank's brand, loss of client and customer confidence. Fraud identification and prevention are major challenges for many financial organizations, retail firms, and e-commerce companies. Fraud detection is used to both identify and stop fraudsters from obtaining goods or bugs illegally. In the same vein, this research will conduct a feasibility study to determine the best fraud detection strategy. We provide a list of the tried-and-true methods for spotting fraud. To avoid fraud detection, many techniques like Deep Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Multilayer Perceptron, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, XG Boost, LGBM, and Decision Tree were used. The dataset was built from 20,000 entries on Kaggle, each having 114 attributes. Before using machine learning and neural network approaches, the dataset is balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Method. Following the analysis of the dataset using a number of methods, it was determined that Random Forest, Decision Tree, XG Boost, and LGBM all had 100% accuracy. This demonstrates that the model outperformed other models by balancing the dataset.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":744,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences","volume":"94 2","pages":"201 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40010-024-00871-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Banking fraud is a problem that is becoming more and more serious, along with considerable monetary losses, damage to the bank's brand, loss of client and customer confidence. Fraud identification and prevention are major challenges for many financial organizations, retail firms, and e-commerce companies. Fraud detection is used to both identify and stop fraudsters from obtaining goods or bugs illegally. In the same vein, this research will conduct a feasibility study to determine the best fraud detection strategy. We provide a list of the tried-and-true methods for spotting fraud. To avoid fraud detection, many techniques like Deep Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Multilayer Perceptron, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, XG Boost, LGBM, and Decision Tree were used. The dataset was built from 20,000 entries on Kaggle, each having 114 attributes. Before using machine learning and neural network approaches, the dataset is balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Method. Following the analysis of the dataset using a number of methods, it was determined that Random Forest, Decision Tree, XG Boost, and LGBM all had 100% accuracy. This demonstrates that the model outperformed other models by balancing the dataset.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 ML 和 NN 检测银行业务欺诈的稳健框架
银行欺诈是一个日益严重的问题,会带来巨大的经济损失、银行品牌受损、客户和顾客信心丧失。欺诈识别和预防是许多金融组织、零售公司和电子商务公司面临的主要挑战。欺诈检测用于识别和阻止欺诈者非法获取商品或窃听器。同样,本研究将开展一项可行性研究,以确定最佳欺诈检测策略。我们提供了一份屡试不爽的欺诈检测方法清单。为避免欺诈检测,我们使用了深度神经网络、支持向量机、多层感知器、K-最近邻、随机森林、XG Boost、LGBM 和决策树等多种技术。数据集由 Kaggle 上的 20,000 个条目构建而成,每个条目有 114 个属性。在使用机器学习和神经网络方法之前,先使用合成少数群体过度采样法对数据集进行平衡。在使用多种方法对数据集进行分析后,确定随机森林、决策树、XG Boost 和 LGBM 的准确率均为 100%。这表明,通过平衡数据集,该模型的性能优于其他模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: To promote research in all the branches of Science & Technology; and disseminate the knowledge and advancements in Science & Technology
期刊最新文献
Diameter Estimation of \((m,\rho )\)-Quasi Einstein Manifolds IoT Adoption for Smart Cities Waste Management using Pythagorean Fuzzy MEREC-SWARA-ARAS Method Rate of Convergence of \(\lambda\)-Bernstein-Beta type operators Stability Analysis of Hybrid Nanofluid with Inclined MHD and Joule Effects: Flow Reversal and Flow Separation Review on Thermogravimetric Analysis of Carbon Dots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1