Understanding the educational inequalities in suicide attempts and their mediators: a Mendelian randomisation study

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1136/gpsych-2023-101369
Jiahao Zhu, Houpu Liu, Rui Gao, Lilu Ding, Jing Wang, Ye Yang, Dan Zhou, Yingjun Li
{"title":"Understanding the educational inequalities in suicide attempts and their mediators: a Mendelian randomisation study","authors":"Jiahao Zhu, Houpu Liu, Rui Gao, Lilu Ding, Jing Wang, Ye Yang, Dan Zhou, Yingjun Li","doi":"10.1136/gpsych-2023-101369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Educational inequalities in suicide have become increasingly prominent over the past decade. Elucidating modifiable risk factors that serve as intermediaries in the impact of low educational attainment on suicide has the potential to reduce health disparities. Aims To examine the risk factors that mediate the relationship between educational attainment and suicide attempts and quantify their contributions to the mediation effect. Methods We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis to estimate the causal effect of educational attainment on suicide attempts, utilising genome-wide association study summary statistics from the Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH; 6024 cases and 44 240 controls) and FinnGen (8978 cases and 368 299 controls). We systematically evaluated 42 putative mediators within the causal pathway connecting reduced educational attainment to suicide attempts and employed two-step and multivariable MR to quantify the proportion of the mediated effect. Results In the combined analysis of iPSYCH and FinnGen, each standard deviation (SD) decrease in genetically predicted educational attainment (equating to 3.4 years of education) was associated with a 105% higher risk of suicide attempts (odds ratio (OR): 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.81 to 2.31). Of the 42 risk factors analysed, the two-step MR identified five factors that mediated the association between educational attainment and suicide attempts. The respective proportions of mediation were 47% (95% CI: 29% to 66%) for smoking behaviour, 36% (95% CI: 0% to 84%) for chronic pain, 49% (95% CI: 36% to 61%) for depression, 35% (95% CI: 12% to 59%) for anxiety and 26% (95% CI: 18% to 34%) for insomnia. Multivariable MR implicated these five mediators collectively, accounting for 68% (95% CI: 40% to 96%) of the total effect. Conclusions This study identified smoking, chronic pain and mental disorders as primary intervention targets for attenuating suicide risk attributable to lower educational levels in the European population. Data are available in a public, open access repository. Summary statistics for suicide attempts are publicly available in the Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH) at <https://ipsych.dk/forskning/downloads>, reference [12] and in the FinnGen study at <https://finngen.gitbook.io/documentation/data-download>, reference [13].","PeriodicalId":12549,"journal":{"name":"General Psychiatry","volume":"476 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2023-101369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Educational inequalities in suicide have become increasingly prominent over the past decade. Elucidating modifiable risk factors that serve as intermediaries in the impact of low educational attainment on suicide has the potential to reduce health disparities. Aims To examine the risk factors that mediate the relationship between educational attainment and suicide attempts and quantify their contributions to the mediation effect. Methods We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis to estimate the causal effect of educational attainment on suicide attempts, utilising genome-wide association study summary statistics from the Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH; 6024 cases and 44 240 controls) and FinnGen (8978 cases and 368 299 controls). We systematically evaluated 42 putative mediators within the causal pathway connecting reduced educational attainment to suicide attempts and employed two-step and multivariable MR to quantify the proportion of the mediated effect. Results In the combined analysis of iPSYCH and FinnGen, each standard deviation (SD) decrease in genetically predicted educational attainment (equating to 3.4 years of education) was associated with a 105% higher risk of suicide attempts (odds ratio (OR): 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.81 to 2.31). Of the 42 risk factors analysed, the two-step MR identified five factors that mediated the association between educational attainment and suicide attempts. The respective proportions of mediation were 47% (95% CI: 29% to 66%) for smoking behaviour, 36% (95% CI: 0% to 84%) for chronic pain, 49% (95% CI: 36% to 61%) for depression, 35% (95% CI: 12% to 59%) for anxiety and 26% (95% CI: 18% to 34%) for insomnia. Multivariable MR implicated these five mediators collectively, accounting for 68% (95% CI: 40% to 96%) of the total effect. Conclusions This study identified smoking, chronic pain and mental disorders as primary intervention targets for attenuating suicide risk attributable to lower educational levels in the European population. Data are available in a public, open access repository. Summary statistics for suicide attempts are publicly available in the Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH) at , reference [12] and in the FinnGen study at , reference [13].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解自杀未遂中的教育不平等及其中介因素:孟德尔随机研究
背景 过去十年来,自杀中的教育不平等问题日益突出。阐明作为低教育程度对自杀影响的中介的可改变风险因素,有可能减少健康差异。目的 研究调解教育程度与自杀企图之间关系的风险因素,并量化这些因素对调解效应的贡献。方法 我们利用整合精神病学研究(iPSYCH;6024 例病例和 44 240 例对照)和 FinnGen(8978 例病例和 368 299 例对照)的全基因组关联研究汇总统计数据,进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以估计教育程度对自杀企图的因果效应。我们系统地评估了连接教育程度降低与自杀未遂之间因果关系的 42 个推定中介因子,并采用两步法和多变量 MR 法量化中介效应的比例。结果 在对 iPSYCH 和 FinnGen 的综合分析中,基因预测的受教育程度(相当于 3.4 年的教育)每降低一个标准差,自杀未遂的风险就会增加 105%(几率比(OR):2.05;95% 置信区间(CI):1.81 至 2.31)。在所分析的 42 个风险因素中,两步 MR 发现有 5 个因素对教育程度与自杀未遂之间的关联起着中介作用。其中,吸烟行为占 47%(95% CI:29% 至 66%),慢性疼痛占 36%(95% CI:0% 至 84%),抑郁占 49%(95% CI:36% 至 61%),焦虑占 35%(95% CI:12% 至 59%),失眠占 26%(95% CI:18% 至 34%)。多变量磁共振成像显示,这五种介导因素共占总效应的 68%(95% CI:40% 至 96%)。结论 该研究发现,吸烟、慢性疼痛和精神障碍是降低欧洲人群因教育水平较低而导致的自杀风险的主要干预目标。数据可在公开、开放的资料库中查阅。有关自杀未遂的简要统计数据可在灵北基金会综合精神病学研究计划(iPSYCH)中公开获取,网址为 ,参考文献[12],也可在芬兰基因研究中公开获取,网址为 ,参考文献[13]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General Psychiatry
General Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
848
期刊介绍: General Psychiatry (GPSYCH), an open-access journal established in 1959, has been a pioneer in disseminating leading psychiatry research. Addressing a global audience of psychiatrists and mental health professionals, the journal covers diverse topics and publishes original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, forums on topical issues, case reports, research methods in psychiatry, and a distinctive section on 'Biostatistics in Psychiatry'. The scope includes original articles on basic research, clinical research, community-based studies, and ecological studies, encompassing a broad spectrum of psychiatric interests.
期刊最新文献
Global burden of mental disorders among adolescents and young adults, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2021. Brain morphological changes across behaviour spectrums in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prevalence and characteristics of off-label use of antidepressants in paediatric patients in China. Efficacy and safety of GW117 tablets in major depressive disorder: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 dose-finding study. Moving beyond diagnostic labels in psychiatry: outcome-linked treatment modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1