Effects of the Omaha System- and HeartScore®-Based Impaired-Risk Perception Reduction Program on the Risk Perception of Individuals Aged 50-65 Years: A One-Group Pre-Test-Post-Test Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1177/08901171241235733
Ayşe Dağıstan Akgöz, Sebahat Gözüm
{"title":"Effects of the Omaha System- and HeartScore®-Based Impaired-Risk Perception Reduction Program on the Risk Perception of Individuals Aged 50-65 Years: A One-Group Pre-Test-Post-Test Study.","authors":"Ayşe Dağıstan Akgöz, Sebahat Gözüm","doi":"10.1177/08901171241235733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of interventions in the Omaha System and HeartScore®-based program to reduce impaired-risk perception.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>and setting: This study utilized a one-group pre-test-post-test design.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The program was conducted among participants aged over 50 years from different social settings.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The program had three parts: a briefing on HeartScore® recommendations, Omaha System interventions, and referral to a doctor.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>HeartScore® determined cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight, and the International PA Questionnaire evaluated physical activity (PA) levels. Self-assessment was used to perceived CVD risk, BMI, and PA.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the pre-test and post-test scores of the Omaha System, the problem rating scale (PRS) subscales and McNemar test to measure changes in CVD risk perception, BMI, and PA level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>310 high-risk individuals out of 522 had impaired perception of their CVD risk. Only 201 responded to follow-up phone calls. Interventions based on HeartScore® and Omaha System improved CVD risk and PA perceptions (<i>P</i> < .001) but not BMI. The program significantly increased knowledge, status, and behavior scores (<i>P</i> < .001). After participating, 39% saw a cardiologist, and 57.2% saw a family physician within six months to reduce impaired risk perception. CVD risk perception increased to the actual level after the intervention, mostly in the group with low education level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The program using the Omaha System and HeartScore® can help middle-aged individuals better understand their risk of cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"825-838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241235733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of interventions in the Omaha System and HeartScore®-based program to reduce impaired-risk perception.

Design: and setting: This study utilized a one-group pre-test-post-test design.

Subjects: The program was conducted among participants aged over 50 years from different social settings.

Intervention: The program had three parts: a briefing on HeartScore® recommendations, Omaha System interventions, and referral to a doctor.

Measures: HeartScore® determined cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight, and the International PA Questionnaire evaluated physical activity (PA) levels. Self-assessment was used to perceived CVD risk, BMI, and PA.

Analysis: We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the pre-test and post-test scores of the Omaha System, the problem rating scale (PRS) subscales and McNemar test to measure changes in CVD risk perception, BMI, and PA level.

Results: 310 high-risk individuals out of 522 had impaired perception of their CVD risk. Only 201 responded to follow-up phone calls. Interventions based on HeartScore® and Omaha System improved CVD risk and PA perceptions (P < .001) but not BMI. The program significantly increased knowledge, status, and behavior scores (P < .001). After participating, 39% saw a cardiologist, and 57.2% saw a family physician within six months to reduce impaired risk perception. CVD risk perception increased to the actual level after the intervention, mostly in the group with low education level.

Conclusions: The program using the Omaha System and HeartScore® can help middle-aged individuals better understand their risk of cardiovascular disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于奥马哈系统和 HeartScore® 的受损风险意识降低计划对 50-65 岁人群风险意识的影响:一组前测-后测研究。
目的:本研究评估了基于奥马哈系统和HeartScore®计划的干预措施对降低受损风险认知的影响:本研究采用一组前测-后测设计:干预措施:该计划由三部分组成:介绍HeartScore®的建议、奥马哈系统干预和转诊:HeartScore®测定心血管疾病(CVD)风险,体重指数(BMI)根据身高和体重计算,国际体育锻炼问卷评估体育锻炼(PA)水平。自我评估用于感知心血管疾病风险、体重指数和体力活动:我们使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较了奥马哈系统和问题评级量表(PRS)分量表的测试前后得分,并使用 McNemar 检验测量了心血管疾病风险认知、体重指数和 PA 水平的变化:在 522 名高风险人群中,有 310 人的心血管疾病风险认知受损。只有 201 人回复了后续电话。基于HeartScore®和奥马哈系统的干预措施改善了心血管疾病风险和PA认知(P < .001),但没有改善BMI。该计划大大提高了知识、状态和行为得分(P < .001)。参与计划后,39% 的人在 6 个月内看了心脏科医生,57.2% 的人看了家庭医生,以减少受损的风险认知。干预后,心血管疾病风险意识提高到了实际水平,这主要发生在受教育水平较低的人群中:结论:使用奥马哈系统和HeartScore®的计划可以帮助中年人更好地了解自己患心血管疾病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Strengthening America's Care Infrastructure by Recognizing and Supporting Sandwich Caregivers. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Indoor No-Smoking Policies at Home Among Chinese American Female Non-Smokers. Public Policy to Support the Health of Caregivers in the Workforce. The Role of Community Health Workers in Tobacco Cessation: A Scoping Review. Ease the Compression: Organizational Support for the Sandwich Generation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1