Effects of the Omaha System- and HeartScore®-Based Impaired-Risk Perception Reduction Program on the Risk Perception of Individuals Aged 50-65 Years: A One-Group Pre-Test-Post-Test Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1177/08901171241235733
Ayşe Dağıstan Akgöz, Sebahat Gözüm
{"title":"Effects of the Omaha System- and HeartScore®-Based Impaired-Risk Perception Reduction Program on the Risk Perception of Individuals Aged 50-65 Years: A One-Group Pre-Test-Post-Test Study.","authors":"Ayşe Dağıstan Akgöz, Sebahat Gözüm","doi":"10.1177/08901171241235733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of interventions in the Omaha System and HeartScore®-based program to reduce impaired-risk perception.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>and setting: This study utilized a one-group pre-test-post-test design.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The program was conducted among participants aged over 50 years from different social settings.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The program had three parts: a briefing on HeartScore® recommendations, Omaha System interventions, and referral to a doctor.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>HeartScore® determined cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight, and the International PA Questionnaire evaluated physical activity (PA) levels. Self-assessment was used to perceived CVD risk, BMI, and PA.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the pre-test and post-test scores of the Omaha System, the problem rating scale (PRS) subscales and McNemar test to measure changes in CVD risk perception, BMI, and PA level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>310 high-risk individuals out of 522 had impaired perception of their CVD risk. Only 201 responded to follow-up phone calls. Interventions based on HeartScore® and Omaha System improved CVD risk and PA perceptions (<i>P</i> < .001) but not BMI. The program significantly increased knowledge, status, and behavior scores (<i>P</i> < .001). After participating, 39% saw a cardiologist, and 57.2% saw a family physician within six months to reduce impaired risk perception. CVD risk perception increased to the actual level after the intervention, mostly in the group with low education level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The program using the Omaha System and HeartScore® can help middle-aged individuals better understand their risk of cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"825-838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241235733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of interventions in the Omaha System and HeartScore®-based program to reduce impaired-risk perception.

Design: and setting: This study utilized a one-group pre-test-post-test design.

Subjects: The program was conducted among participants aged over 50 years from different social settings.

Intervention: The program had three parts: a briefing on HeartScore® recommendations, Omaha System interventions, and referral to a doctor.

Measures: HeartScore® determined cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight, and the International PA Questionnaire evaluated physical activity (PA) levels. Self-assessment was used to perceived CVD risk, BMI, and PA.

Analysis: We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the pre-test and post-test scores of the Omaha System, the problem rating scale (PRS) subscales and McNemar test to measure changes in CVD risk perception, BMI, and PA level.

Results: 310 high-risk individuals out of 522 had impaired perception of their CVD risk. Only 201 responded to follow-up phone calls. Interventions based on HeartScore® and Omaha System improved CVD risk and PA perceptions (P < .001) but not BMI. The program significantly increased knowledge, status, and behavior scores (P < .001). After participating, 39% saw a cardiologist, and 57.2% saw a family physician within six months to reduce impaired risk perception. CVD risk perception increased to the actual level after the intervention, mostly in the group with low education level.

Conclusions: The program using the Omaha System and HeartScore® can help middle-aged individuals better understand their risk of cardiovascular disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于奥马哈系统和 HeartScore® 的受损风险意识降低计划对 50-65 岁人群风险意识的影响:一组前测-后测研究。
目的:本研究评估了基于奥马哈系统和HeartScore®计划的干预措施对降低受损风险认知的影响:本研究采用一组前测-后测设计:干预措施:该计划由三部分组成:介绍HeartScore®的建议、奥马哈系统干预和转诊:HeartScore®测定心血管疾病(CVD)风险,体重指数(BMI)根据身高和体重计算,国际体育锻炼问卷评估体育锻炼(PA)水平。自我评估用于感知心血管疾病风险、体重指数和体力活动:我们使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较了奥马哈系统和问题评级量表(PRS)分量表的测试前后得分,并使用 McNemar 检验测量了心血管疾病风险认知、体重指数和 PA 水平的变化:在 522 名高风险人群中,有 310 人的心血管疾病风险认知受损。只有 201 人回复了后续电话。基于HeartScore®和奥马哈系统的干预措施改善了心血管疾病风险和PA认知(P < .001),但没有改善BMI。该计划大大提高了知识、状态和行为得分(P < .001)。参与计划后,39% 的人在 6 个月内看了心脏科医生,57.2% 的人看了家庭医生,以减少受损的风险认知。干预后,心血管疾病风险意识提高到了实际水平,这主要发生在受教育水平较低的人群中:结论:使用奥马哈系统和HeartScore®的计划可以帮助中年人更好地了解自己患心血管疾病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
In Brief. The 'Natural' Accord of DuBois and Washington: An Environmentally Racialized Consciousness. Multi-Family Housing Environment and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Misaligned Supports: Differences in Reported Health Care Worker Well-being Supports Provided and Needed During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Family-Based Approach to Promoting Pediatric Mental Health Recovery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1