{"title":"Flood, fires, and drought: Do we have the tools to risk-assess for environmental management of extreme climatic events?","authors":"Nasrin Golzadeh, Mohammad Reza Alizadeh","doi":"10.1002/ieam.4892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Floods, fires, and droughts as extreme climate events are significantly increasing concerns in environmental management, ecosystems, societies, communities, and economies worldwide. Given the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme climate events due to factors such as global change and rising temperatures, there is an urgent need to improve our risk assessment and management abilities. Conducting a comprehensive climate risk assessment is complex; however, this approach is essential for developing effective strategies to mitigate the impacts of these disasters on ecosystems and build adaptation and resilience, especially in marginalized and vulnerable communities worldwide. Thus, one important question comes to mind: Do we have the necessary tools to conduct comprehensive risk assessments for environmental management, given escalating climate events? In this editorial, we aim to cover the current state of risk assessment tools, identify gaps, and discuss what is needed to improve understanding and effective management of extreme climate events, using innovative approaches where necessary.</p><p>Both prospective and retrospective risk assessment methods/tools are important because they provide actionable assessments of climate impacts for communities, businesses, industries, and governments under a range of plausible scenarios. These methods/tools help combine information about hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, integrating climatic and other modeling to determine an estimation of risks (Fox et al., <span>2017</span>). Additionally, these methods/tools can help us better understand the interactions and dynamics of multiple climate hazards, as well as the complex potential trade-offs between management scenarios, which are crucial for managing current and future climate change risks prevention, mitigation, and preparedness (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, <span>2012</span>). By using risk assessment methods and tools, decision-makers can better understand the impacts of global change on communities and develop strategies for better protection and resiliency of people and the ecosystems upon which they rely. Hence, these tools provide a reliable and actionable approach to assessing and managing the risks posed by extreme climatic events.</p><p>Climate change risk assessments and management are complex concepts due to the ambiguity and uncertainty of climate change, interactions between multiple drivers, and the cascading nature of risks (Lawrence et al., <span>2020</span>; Pescaroli & Alexander, <span>2018</span>). For a more robust and holistic approach to risk assessment in environmental management of extreme events, future climate change risk assessments should integrate a deeper understanding of how various vulnerability factors including socioenvironmental and economic status and geographical location interact and influence risk preparedness, mitigation, and resilience (Weaver et al., <span>2017</span>). Future research should incorporate and encourage participatory community research on climate risk and resilience, leveraging communities' cultural and traditional knowledge (David-Chavez & Gavin, <span>2018</span>; Scherhaufer, <span>2021</span>). Standardized metrics are essential in climate risk assessments for better comparability, quality, and credibility (Hoch & Trigg, <span>2019</span>). With today's technological advancement, satellite data, artificial intelligence, and remote sensing are valuable tools for risk management and preparedness as they offer advanced tools for real-time monitoring that could be useful in early warning notifications, prediction, and comprehensive analysis of environmental changes and potential hazards (Abid et al., <span>2021</span>; Sun et al., <span>2020</span>). While these tools have limitations, they remain beneficial for integrated climatic risk assessments. Integrated risk assessment and management will further progress with a more cross-sectional collaboration approach where various stakeholders can engage and participate, ensuring that climatic risk assessments are translated and incorporated into policy- and decision-making processes from local to global levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":"20 2","pages":"312-313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ieam.4892","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ieam.4892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Floods, fires, and droughts as extreme climate events are significantly increasing concerns in environmental management, ecosystems, societies, communities, and economies worldwide. Given the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme climate events due to factors such as global change and rising temperatures, there is an urgent need to improve our risk assessment and management abilities. Conducting a comprehensive climate risk assessment is complex; however, this approach is essential for developing effective strategies to mitigate the impacts of these disasters on ecosystems and build adaptation and resilience, especially in marginalized and vulnerable communities worldwide. Thus, one important question comes to mind: Do we have the necessary tools to conduct comprehensive risk assessments for environmental management, given escalating climate events? In this editorial, we aim to cover the current state of risk assessment tools, identify gaps, and discuss what is needed to improve understanding and effective management of extreme climate events, using innovative approaches where necessary.
Both prospective and retrospective risk assessment methods/tools are important because they provide actionable assessments of climate impacts for communities, businesses, industries, and governments under a range of plausible scenarios. These methods/tools help combine information about hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, integrating climatic and other modeling to determine an estimation of risks (Fox et al., 2017). Additionally, these methods/tools can help us better understand the interactions and dynamics of multiple climate hazards, as well as the complex potential trade-offs between management scenarios, which are crucial for managing current and future climate change risks prevention, mitigation, and preparedness (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2012). By using risk assessment methods and tools, decision-makers can better understand the impacts of global change on communities and develop strategies for better protection and resiliency of people and the ecosystems upon which they rely. Hence, these tools provide a reliable and actionable approach to assessing and managing the risks posed by extreme climatic events.
Climate change risk assessments and management are complex concepts due to the ambiguity and uncertainty of climate change, interactions between multiple drivers, and the cascading nature of risks (Lawrence et al., 2020; Pescaroli & Alexander, 2018). For a more robust and holistic approach to risk assessment in environmental management of extreme events, future climate change risk assessments should integrate a deeper understanding of how various vulnerability factors including socioenvironmental and economic status and geographical location interact and influence risk preparedness, mitigation, and resilience (Weaver et al., 2017). Future research should incorporate and encourage participatory community research on climate risk and resilience, leveraging communities' cultural and traditional knowledge (David-Chavez & Gavin, 2018; Scherhaufer, 2021). Standardized metrics are essential in climate risk assessments for better comparability, quality, and credibility (Hoch & Trigg, 2019). With today's technological advancement, satellite data, artificial intelligence, and remote sensing are valuable tools for risk management and preparedness as they offer advanced tools for real-time monitoring that could be useful in early warning notifications, prediction, and comprehensive analysis of environmental changes and potential hazards (Abid et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2020). While these tools have limitations, they remain beneficial for integrated climatic risk assessments. Integrated risk assessment and management will further progress with a more cross-sectional collaboration approach where various stakeholders can engage and participate, ensuring that climatic risk assessments are translated and incorporated into policy- and decision-making processes from local to global levels.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.