首页 > 最新文献

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management最新文献

英文 中文
Getting most out of ecotoxicological field data with generalized linear and additive mixed models: a 6-step analysis framework. 利用广义线性和可加性混合模型获得最多的生态毒理学现场数据:6步分析框架。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag018
Peter Vermeiren, Torben Wittwer, Stephanie Coffinet, Felix von Blanckenhagen, Oliver Jakoby

Analysing datasets from ecotoxicological studies conducted under field or semi-field (i.e.,, enclosure) conditions to evaluate the risks posed by chemicals can be challenging due to the inherent variability of natural systems, complex interactions between environmental factors, presence of non-linear dynamics, and difficulties working with free-ranging wildlife. Regression-based statistical approaches, including generalized linear and additive effect models (GLM, GAM) and their "mixed" counterparts (GLMM, GAMM) have a long tradition in ecology to find signals in noisy data by disentangling the influence of multiple factors. They have gained attention in analysing ecotoxicological data for risk assessment of chemicals. Nevertheless, GLMM and GAMM are often perceived as complex, leading to hesitation to account for their results in regulatory evaluations. To enhance the understanding and uptake of GLMM and GAMM, we present a framework to demystify the development (i.e.,, calibration, internal validation, and selection) of GLMM and GAMMs within the context of ecotoxicological field study data. An initial data exploration; an evaluation of the smallest level of significant difference that the model can discriminate (Minimum Detectable Difference, MDD); and a final model interpretation and visualization complete the framework in a total of six steps which enable significance of treatment-related effects to be checked at two independent stages. The framework is exemplified with a case study on common voles exposed to a fungicide under field conditions. The case study demonstrated the advantages of GLMM and GAMM in obtaining most out of valuable ecotoxicological field data, namely, their flexibility to different data types (e.g.,, counts, proportions, continuous data) recorded as study endpoints, ability to incorporate all data within a single analysis while considering the repeated sampling within the same fields (i.e.,, avoiding pseudoreplication), the potential non-linear dynamics of the endpoints over time, and the multiple influencing factors of direct and indirect interest to the study interpretation.

分析在野外或半野外(即圈养)条件下进行的生态毒理学研究数据集以评估化学品构成的风险可能具有挑战性,因为自然系统的内在可变性、环境因素之间复杂的相互作用、非线性动力学的存在以及与自由放养的野生动物一起工作的困难。基于回归的统计方法,包括广义线性和加性效应模型(GLM, GAM)以及它们的“混合”对应模型(GLMM, GAMM),在生态学中有着悠久的传统,通过分解多因素的影响,从噪声数据中发现信号。它们在分析用于化学品风险评估的生态毒理学数据方面获得了关注。然而,GLMM和GAMM通常被认为是复杂的,导致在监管评估中对其结果的考虑犹豫不决。为了加强对GLMM和GAMM的理解和吸收,我们提出了一个框架,在生态毒理学野外研究数据的背景下,揭开GLMM和GAMM的发展(即校准,内部验证和选择)的神秘面纱。初步的数据探索;对模型可以区分的最小显著差异水平的评估(最小可检测差异,MDD);最后的模型解释和可视化完成了总共六个步骤的框架,这使得治疗相关效果的重要性可以在两个独立的阶段进行检查。该框架以在野外条件下暴露于杀菌剂的普通田鼠的案例研究为例。案例研究证明了GLMM和GAMM在获取最有价值的生态毒理学现场数据方面的优势,即它们对记录为研究终点的不同数据类型(例如,计数、比例、连续数据)的灵活性,在考虑同一领域内重复采样的同时将所有数据纳入单一分析的能力(即,避免假复制),随着时间的推移,端点的潜在非线性动态,并对多重影响因素进行了直接和间接的研究解释。
{"title":"Getting most out of ecotoxicological field data with generalized linear and additive mixed models: a 6-step analysis framework.","authors":"Peter Vermeiren, Torben Wittwer, Stephanie Coffinet, Felix von Blanckenhagen, Oliver Jakoby","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analysing datasets from ecotoxicological studies conducted under field or semi-field (i.e.,, enclosure) conditions to evaluate the risks posed by chemicals can be challenging due to the inherent variability of natural systems, complex interactions between environmental factors, presence of non-linear dynamics, and difficulties working with free-ranging wildlife. Regression-based statistical approaches, including generalized linear and additive effect models (GLM, GAM) and their \"mixed\" counterparts (GLMM, GAMM) have a long tradition in ecology to find signals in noisy data by disentangling the influence of multiple factors. They have gained attention in analysing ecotoxicological data for risk assessment of chemicals. Nevertheless, GLMM and GAMM are often perceived as complex, leading to hesitation to account for their results in regulatory evaluations. To enhance the understanding and uptake of GLMM and GAMM, we present a framework to demystify the development (i.e.,, calibration, internal validation, and selection) of GLMM and GAMMs within the context of ecotoxicological field study data. An initial data exploration; an evaluation of the smallest level of significant difference that the model can discriminate (Minimum Detectable Difference, MDD); and a final model interpretation and visualization complete the framework in a total of six steps which enable significance of treatment-related effects to be checked at two independent stages. The framework is exemplified with a case study on common voles exposed to a fungicide under field conditions. The case study demonstrated the advantages of GLMM and GAMM in obtaining most out of valuable ecotoxicological field data, namely, their flexibility to different data types (e.g.,, counts, proportions, continuous data) recorded as study endpoints, ability to incorporate all data within a single analysis while considering the repeated sampling within the same fields (i.e.,, avoiding pseudoreplication), the potential non-linear dynamics of the endpoints over time, and the multiple influencing factors of direct and indirect interest to the study interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implications of asymmetric concentration-response relationships on effect concentration estimation: A case study regarding the chronic toxicity of NaCl to Ceriodaphnia dubia. 非对称浓度-反应关系对效应浓度估计的影响:NaCl对dubia Ceriodaphnia慢性毒性的案例研究。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag014
Russell J Erickson, David R Mount, Brandy B Forsman, Terry L Highland, J Russell Hockett, Correne T Jenson, Teresa J Norberg-King

An important limitation of concentration-response (C-R) modeling of toxicity test data is the imposition of a shape for this relationship that can deviate from the underlying true relationship, thereby biasing estimates of effect concentrations (ECp's). In particular, the imposed mathematical model is often symmetric, whereas considerable asymmetry might be present in the underlying relationship that is either not evident or not addressed in standard toxicity tests with limited numbers of treatments. To evaluate asymmetry and its implications for ECp estimation, six simultaneous tests of NaCl chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia were conducted, providing extensive information on inter-replicate variability and on the shape of the C-R relationship. An asymmetric C-R relationship derived from this large data set was used to simulate data sets with a more typical, smaller configuration, which were subject to C-R analysis using both symmetric and asymmetric models. Both models resulted in substantial uncertainties for estimating ECp's at low p values for this test configuration. There is a need for more work and care regarding the use of C-R analysis in developing effects assessments for low levels of effect.

毒性测试数据的浓度-反应(C-R)模型的一个重要限制是,这种关系的形状可能会偏离潜在的真实关系,从而使效应浓度(ECp)的估计产生偏差。特别是,强加的数学模型往往是对称的,而潜在的关系可能存在相当大的不对称性,这种不对称性要么不明显,要么在治疗数量有限的标准毒性试验中没有得到解决。为了评估不对称性及其对ECp估计的影响,我们同时进行了6项NaCl对dubia Ceriodaphnia慢性毒性试验,提供了有关重复间变异性和C-R关系形状的广泛信息。从这个大型数据集派生的非对称C-R关系用于模拟具有更典型、更小配置的数据集,这些数据集使用对称和非对称模型进行C-R分析。对于该测试配置,两种模型在估计低p值时的ECp时都存在很大的不确定性。在为低水平效应制定效果评估时,需要对使用C-R分析进行更多的工作和注意。
{"title":"Implications of asymmetric concentration-response relationships on effect concentration estimation: A case study regarding the chronic toxicity of NaCl to Ceriodaphnia dubia.","authors":"Russell J Erickson, David R Mount, Brandy B Forsman, Terry L Highland, J Russell Hockett, Correne T Jenson, Teresa J Norberg-King","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An important limitation of concentration-response (C-R) modeling of toxicity test data is the imposition of a shape for this relationship that can deviate from the underlying true relationship, thereby biasing estimates of effect concentrations (ECp's). In particular, the imposed mathematical model is often symmetric, whereas considerable asymmetry might be present in the underlying relationship that is either not evident or not addressed in standard toxicity tests with limited numbers of treatments. To evaluate asymmetry and its implications for ECp estimation, six simultaneous tests of NaCl chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia were conducted, providing extensive information on inter-replicate variability and on the shape of the C-R relationship. An asymmetric C-R relationship derived from this large data set was used to simulate data sets with a more typical, smaller configuration, which were subject to C-R analysis using both symmetric and asymmetric models. Both models resulted in substantial uncertainties for estimating ECp's at low p values for this test configuration. There is a need for more work and care regarding the use of C-R analysis in developing effects assessments for low levels of effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dietary Health Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Pistachios Based on Probabilistic Modeling Techniques. 基于概率建模技术的开心果中农药残留膳食健康风险评估
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag015
Mahsa Tahergorabi, Majid Hashemi, Aida Tayebiyan, Saeed Rajabi

Pistachio is an important agricultural commodity, and Iran is among the world's leading manufacturers, exporters, and consumers. However, extensive pesticide application in pistachio groves is a source of concern regarding residual contamination in edible nuts. In the present study, 25 pistachio samples collected from Sirjan orchards were analyzed for pesticide residues by the QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) procedure followed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry quantification. Five pesticides from three priority chemical classes-organophosphates (dichlorvos, dimethoate, ethion), organochlorines (DDT), and neonicotinoids (thiacloprid)-were present in concentrations ranging from 0.015 to 0.064 mg/kg. Residue concentrations were assessed against national and European Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs). Probabilistic health risk was assessed by a Monte Carlo Simulation to estimate non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks for children and adults. The 95th percentile of total hazard quotient was 1.471 in adults and 10.644 in children, indicating moderate to high risk of non-carcinogenicity, particularly in children due to their low body weight and high intake-to-weight ratio. Carcinogenic risk calculation of dichlorvos and DDT also exceeded the U.S. The EPA threshold level is 1 × 10-6, while children's and adults' total carcinogenic risk could reach 7.4 × 10-4 and 1.2 × 10-4, respectively. Pesticide concentration was identified as the greatest predictor of risk in a sensitivity analysis. The results urge the implementation of Good Agricultural Practices, frequent residue monitoring, and more stringent pesticide regulations to improve food safety and safeguard vulnerable populations, particularly children.

开心果是一种重要的农产品,伊朗是世界上主要的生产国、出口国和消费国之一。然而,在开心果林中广泛施用农药是食用坚果残留污染的一个令人担忧的来源。本研究采用QuEChERS(快速、简便、廉价、有效、坚固、安全)气相色谱-质谱联用技术对采自锡尔扬果园的25份开心果样品进行了农药残留分析。来自三个优先化学类别的五种农药——有机磷(敌敌畏、乐果、硫醚)、有机氯(滴滴涕)和新烟碱(噻虫啉)——的浓度范围为0.015至0.064毫克/公斤。根据国家和欧洲最大残留限量(MRLs)评估了残留浓度。通过蒙特卡罗模拟评估概率健康风险,以估计儿童和成人的非致癌性和致癌性风险。总危险商数的第95百分位成人为1.471,儿童为10.644,表明具有中等至高度的非致癌性风险,特别是儿童,因为他们的体重低,摄入体重比高。敌敌畏和滴滴涕的致癌风险计算也超过了美国EPA的阈值1 × 10-6,而儿童和成人的总致癌风险分别可达到7.4 × 10-4和1.2 × 10-4。在敏感性分析中,农药浓度被确定为风险的最大预测因子。研究结果敦促实施良好农业规范,频繁监测残留,制定更严格的农药法规,以改善食品安全,保护弱势群体,特别是儿童。
{"title":"Dietary Health Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Pistachios Based on Probabilistic Modeling Techniques.","authors":"Mahsa Tahergorabi, Majid Hashemi, Aida Tayebiyan, Saeed Rajabi","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pistachio is an important agricultural commodity, and Iran is among the world's leading manufacturers, exporters, and consumers. However, extensive pesticide application in pistachio groves is a source of concern regarding residual contamination in edible nuts. In the present study, 25 pistachio samples collected from Sirjan orchards were analyzed for pesticide residues by the QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) procedure followed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry quantification. Five pesticides from three priority chemical classes-organophosphates (dichlorvos, dimethoate, ethion), organochlorines (DDT), and neonicotinoids (thiacloprid)-were present in concentrations ranging from 0.015 to 0.064 mg/kg. Residue concentrations were assessed against national and European Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs). Probabilistic health risk was assessed by a Monte Carlo Simulation to estimate non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks for children and adults. The 95th percentile of total hazard quotient was 1.471 in adults and 10.644 in children, indicating moderate to high risk of non-carcinogenicity, particularly in children due to their low body weight and high intake-to-weight ratio. Carcinogenic risk calculation of dichlorvos and DDT also exceeded the U.S. The EPA threshold level is 1 × 10-6, while children's and adults' total carcinogenic risk could reach 7.4 × 10-4 and 1.2 × 10-4, respectively. Pesticide concentration was identified as the greatest predictor of risk in a sensitivity analysis. The results urge the implementation of Good Agricultural Practices, frequent residue monitoring, and more stringent pesticide regulations to improve food safety and safeguard vulnerable populations, particularly children.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The equivalence testing approach for the statistical analysis of higher tier pollinator studies-recommendations and challenges. 高等传粉媒介研究统计分析的等效检验方法——建议与挑战。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag006
D Poursina, E Collison, S Kimmel, X Sopko

The revised 2023 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees introduced a major change in the statistical evaluation of higher tier studies, replacing difference testing with the equivalence testing approach. This paper evaluates several statistical models for equivalence testing of colony strength endpoints in honey bee semi-field studies, including a t-test, a two-way ANOVA, and a linear-mixed-effects model incorporating an autoregressive (AR) structure. Using a range of simulated scenarios, model performance was compared to determine suitability and the likely level of replication needed to conclude a low risk of a test substance with a true effect size of <10% reduction in colony strength. The linear mixed-effects model with AR structure and baseline adjustment offered the highest statistical power among the tested approaches. In all simulated scenarios, achieving 80% power to conclude equivalence required substantially more replication than the minimum of three replicates recommended in the EPPO (2010) test guideline. Under the best-case scenario, a minimum of seven replicates was needed when the true effect size was 0, whereas effects close to the equivalence margin (a true 9% reduction) required extremely large sample sizes, up to 612 replicates, to achieve sufficient power. Potential modifications to the study design to reduce replication needs were also explored. Reducing initial inter-colony variability alone did not meaningfully decrease required sample sizes, whereas increasing temporal correlation among repeated observations improved power and lowered replication requirements. Nevertheless, it is questioned whether the large numbers of replicates illustrated here are manageable in a practical study setup. Caution is needed during the implementation of the equivalence approach for regulatory evaluation until applicants and regulatory bodies better understand if such studies can be feasibly designed and conducted to demonstrate acceptable risk against the specific protection goals.

修订后的欧洲食品安全局(EFSA) 2023年植物保护产品对蜜蜂的风险评估指南对高级研究的统计评估进行了重大改变,用等效测试方法取代了差异测试。本文评估了蜜蜂半场研究中用于群体强度终点等效检验的几种统计模型,包括t检验、双向方差分析和包含自回归(AR)结构的线性混合效应模型。使用一系列模拟情景,对模型性能进行比较,以确定适用性和可能的复制水平,从而得出具有真实效应大小的测试物质的低风险结论
{"title":"The equivalence testing approach for the statistical analysis of higher tier pollinator studies-recommendations and challenges.","authors":"D Poursina, E Collison, S Kimmel, X Sopko","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The revised 2023 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees introduced a major change in the statistical evaluation of higher tier studies, replacing difference testing with the equivalence testing approach. This paper evaluates several statistical models for equivalence testing of colony strength endpoints in honey bee semi-field studies, including a t-test, a two-way ANOVA, and a linear-mixed-effects model incorporating an autoregressive (AR) structure. Using a range of simulated scenarios, model performance was compared to determine suitability and the likely level of replication needed to conclude a low risk of a test substance with a true effect size of <10% reduction in colony strength. The linear mixed-effects model with AR structure and baseline adjustment offered the highest statistical power among the tested approaches. In all simulated scenarios, achieving 80% power to conclude equivalence required substantially more replication than the minimum of three replicates recommended in the EPPO (2010) test guideline. Under the best-case scenario, a minimum of seven replicates was needed when the true effect size was 0, whereas effects close to the equivalence margin (a true 9% reduction) required extremely large sample sizes, up to 612 replicates, to achieve sufficient power. Potential modifications to the study design to reduce replication needs were also explored. Reducing initial inter-colony variability alone did not meaningfully decrease required sample sizes, whereas increasing temporal correlation among repeated observations improved power and lowered replication requirements. Nevertheless, it is questioned whether the large numbers of replicates illustrated here are manageable in a practical study setup. Caution is needed during the implementation of the equivalence approach for regulatory evaluation until applicants and regulatory bodies better understand if such studies can be feasibly designed and conducted to demonstrate acceptable risk against the specific protection goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146062728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating Lean Six Sigma and Life-Cycle Assessment approaches for sustainable manufacturing of fertilizers. 整合精益六西格玛和生命周期评估方法的肥料可持续生产。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-01-25 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag013
Francisco J Alarcón, María Ángeles Martín-Lara, Salvador Pérez-Huertas, Guillermo Garcia-Garcia, Mónica Calero

The utilization of fertilizers in contemporary agriculture is of paramount importance, given their capacity to enhance crop productivity. However, fertilizer manufacturing is a very energy-consuming activity that also emits harmful substances, thereby impacting the environment. In this article, we propose the integration of Lean Six Sigma and Life-Cycle Assessment methodologies to guide fertilizer manufacturers towards a more sustainable fertilizer production. We applied this approach in a case study with a Spanish fertilizer producer. A comparative study of its environmental performance was undertaken to quantify the benefit of applying Lean Six Sigma principles to achieve reduced variability in product compositions, optimized raw material use, and improved process performance. We also assessed the environmental impact of four waste treatment scenarios for the wastewater and solid waste generated in the manufacturing process. Our results showed that the improvements obtained by the application of Lean Six Sigma resulted in a reduction of the environmental impact by 8.6%, mostly driven by a lower use of copper sulphate. The best waste treatment scenario was determined to be composting of the solid waste and wastewater recovery. Human carcinogenic toxicity accounted for nearly half of the total environmental impact of fertilizer production. Furthermore, the reaction process was found to contribute the most to the overall environmental impact due to the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. It is expected that this study will motivate fertilizer manufacturers, as well as the chemical industry in general, to adopt methodologies like Lean Six Sigma and Life-Cycle Assessment to make their processes more sustainable.

在现代农业中,肥料的利用是至关重要的,因为它们能够提高作物生产力。然而,化肥生产是一项非常消耗能源的活动,也会排放有害物质,从而影响环境。在本文中,我们建议整合精益六西格玛和生命周期评估方法,以指导肥料制造商走向更可持续的肥料生产。我们在西班牙一家化肥生产商的案例研究中应用了这种方法。对其环境绩效进行了比较研究,以量化应用精益六西格玛原则的好处,以减少产品成分的可变性,优化原材料使用,提高工艺性能。我们亦评估了四种废物处理方案对制造过程中产生的废水和固体废物的环境影响。我们的研究结果表明,精益六西格玛的应用使环境影响减少了8.6%,这主要是由于硫酸铜的使用减少了。确定了固体废物堆肥和废水回收的最佳处理方案。人类致癌毒性占化肥生产总环境影响的近一半。此外,由于使用乙二胺四乙酸,该反应过程对整体环境影响最大。预计这项研究将激励化肥制造商以及一般的化学工业采用精益六西格玛和生命周期评估等方法,使其过程更具可持续性。
{"title":"Integrating Lean Six Sigma and Life-Cycle Assessment approaches for sustainable manufacturing of fertilizers.","authors":"Francisco J Alarcón, María Ángeles Martín-Lara, Salvador Pérez-Huertas, Guillermo Garcia-Garcia, Mónica Calero","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utilization of fertilizers in contemporary agriculture is of paramount importance, given their capacity to enhance crop productivity. However, fertilizer manufacturing is a very energy-consuming activity that also emits harmful substances, thereby impacting the environment. In this article, we propose the integration of Lean Six Sigma and Life-Cycle Assessment methodologies to guide fertilizer manufacturers towards a more sustainable fertilizer production. We applied this approach in a case study with a Spanish fertilizer producer. A comparative study of its environmental performance was undertaken to quantify the benefit of applying Lean Six Sigma principles to achieve reduced variability in product compositions, optimized raw material use, and improved process performance. We also assessed the environmental impact of four waste treatment scenarios for the wastewater and solid waste generated in the manufacturing process. Our results showed that the improvements obtained by the application of Lean Six Sigma resulted in a reduction of the environmental impact by 8.6%, mostly driven by a lower use of copper sulphate. The best waste treatment scenario was determined to be composting of the solid waste and wastewater recovery. Human carcinogenic toxicity accounted for nearly half of the total environmental impact of fertilizer production. Furthermore, the reaction process was found to contribute the most to the overall environmental impact due to the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. It is expected that this study will motivate fertilizer manufacturers, as well as the chemical industry in general, to adopt methodologies like Lean Six Sigma and Life-Cycle Assessment to make their processes more sustainable.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How normalization of reporter gene in vitro assays affects the results. 报告基因的规范化对体外检测结果的影响。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag012
Nina Cedergreen, Geeta Mandava, Johan Lundqvist

Normalization strategies in reporter gene in vitro assays may influence the interpretation of chemical bioactivity, yet their implications are rarely systematically assessed. This study evaluates how different normalization approaches-subtraction versus division by baseline controls, and normalization to positive controls-affect assay outcomes across three receptor-based systems: Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR), Estrogen Receptor agonist (ERago), and Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Analyses are done on > 400 wastewater samples tested in 34-54 microplates including reference chemical concentration-response curves, 1% methanol, 1% ethanol, evaporated solvents and media controls. Results demonstrate that even low solvent concentrations can significantly alter receptor responses. Evaporation of solvents mitigated adverse effects but may introduce biases due to loss of volatile or hydrophobic compounds in samples. Variability in assay signals was predominantly driven by systematic factors such as e.g. cell growth and reader sensitivity, rather than random noise. Normalization to both baseline and positive controls consistently yielded the most reproducible EC-values across plates and campaigns. The findings underscore the importance of rigorous control validation and normalization in in vitro bioassays, particularly when applied to complex environmental samples. Recommendations include minimizing solvent concentrations, validating solvent effects per assay, and using dual normalization strategies. The study also highlights the need for further research into time-dependent toxicity dynamics and signal quenching by environmental matrices to enhance in vitro assay robustness and comparability.

报告基因在体外检测中的规范化策略可能会影响化学生物活性的解释,但其含义很少被系统地评估。本研究评估了不同的归一化方法——基线对照的减法与除法,以及归一化到阳性对照——如何影响三种基于受体的系统的检测结果:芳烃受体(AhR)、雌激素受体激动剂(ERago)和核因子红细胞2相关因子2 (Nrf2)。在34-54微孔板上对bbbb400个废水样品进行分析,包括参考化学浓度-响应曲线,1%甲醇,1%乙醇,蒸发溶剂和介质控制。结果表明,即使是低浓度的溶剂也能显著改变受体的反应。溶剂的蒸发减轻了不利影响,但可能由于样品中挥发性或疏水性化合物的损失而引入偏差。分析信号的可变性主要是由系统因素驱动的,例如细胞生长和读取器灵敏度,而不是随机噪声。基线和阳性对照的标准化一致地产生了最可重复的ec值。研究结果强调了严格的控制验证和规范化在体外生物测定中的重要性,特别是当应用于复杂的环境样品时。建议包括尽量减少溶剂浓度,验证每次分析的溶剂效应,并使用双重归一化策略。该研究还强调需要进一步研究环境基质的时间依赖性毒性动力学和信号猝灭,以提高体外检测的稳健性和可比性。
{"title":"How normalization of reporter gene in vitro assays affects the results.","authors":"Nina Cedergreen, Geeta Mandava, Johan Lundqvist","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Normalization strategies in reporter gene in vitro assays may influence the interpretation of chemical bioactivity, yet their implications are rarely systematically assessed. This study evaluates how different normalization approaches-subtraction versus division by baseline controls, and normalization to positive controls-affect assay outcomes across three receptor-based systems: Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR), Estrogen Receptor agonist (ERago), and Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Analyses are done on > 400 wastewater samples tested in 34-54 microplates including reference chemical concentration-response curves, 1% methanol, 1% ethanol, evaporated solvents and media controls. Results demonstrate that even low solvent concentrations can significantly alter receptor responses. Evaporation of solvents mitigated adverse effects but may introduce biases due to loss of volatile or hydrophobic compounds in samples. Variability in assay signals was predominantly driven by systematic factors such as e.g. cell growth and reader sensitivity, rather than random noise. Normalization to both baseline and positive controls consistently yielded the most reproducible EC-values across plates and campaigns. The findings underscore the importance of rigorous control validation and normalization in in vitro bioassays, particularly when applied to complex environmental samples. Recommendations include minimizing solvent concentrations, validating solvent effects per assay, and using dual normalization strategies. The study also highlights the need for further research into time-dependent toxicity dynamics and signal quenching by environmental matrices to enhance in vitro assay robustness and comparability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ecotoxicological Risk of Sulfate in Baltic Sea Brackish water Assessed Using Model-Averaged Species Sensitivity Distribution. 用模型平均物种敏感性分布评估波罗的海咸淡水中硫酸盐的生态毒理学风险。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag010
Xiaoxuan Hu, Matti T Leppänen, Kari K Lehtonen, Anna K Karjalainen, Johanna Järvistö, Mikko Mäkinen, Rashmika Samarawickrama, Evita Strode, Juha S Karjalainen

Sulfate is a major ion commonly found in natural environments but excess amounts of it can be harmful to aquatic life. Effects of sulfate on freshwater organisms have been explored previously while its effects on brackish water biota are poorly known. The elevating human-induced sulfate load to the Baltic Sea necessitates understanding how brackish water species tolerate the additional sulfate. In this study, we conducted chronic sulfate toxicity tests on species from coastal areas of the Baltic Sea. Species of both freshwater and marine origin in the Baltic Sea were tested. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) with a model-averaging approach was used to derive the 5th percentile hazardous concentration (HC5). For comparison, HC5s were also derived from three alternative single-distribution models. Sulfate sensitivity varied notably between the test species. The most sensitive species were found to be common water moss Fontinalis antipyretica and European whitefish Coregonus lavaretus. The chronic HC5 with 95% confidence interval was 1 204 (472-2429) mg/L for the coastal Baltic Sea areas with a salinity range from 2 to 6‰. To account for SSD uncertainties, the HC5 is divided by the assessment factor (AF) to derive the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC). Different AF scenarios were evaluated through deriving the percentages of species affected under each PNEC. The PNEC that would protect over 95% of species with a 95% probability was 469 mg/L, corresponding to an AF of 2.57, which accounted for the statistical uncertainties from the SSD modeling. Compared to species inhabiting freshwater ecosystems in general, the Baltic Sea species showed significantly higher tolerance to sulfate. The toxicity tests performed here on a wide range of Baltic Sea species significantly contribute to the understanding of sensitivity of brackish water species to sulfate and advanced the development of its risk assessment in brackish water.

硫酸盐是自然环境中常见的一种主要离子,但过量的硫酸盐会对水生生物有害。硫酸盐对淡水生物的影响以前已经探讨过,而它对咸淡水生物群的影响却知之甚少。波罗的海人为引起的硫酸盐负荷的增加需要了解咸淡水物种如何承受额外的硫酸盐。在这项研究中,我们对波罗的海沿岸地区的物种进行了慢性硫酸盐毒性试验。对波罗的海的淡水和海洋物种进行了测试。采用物种敏感性分布(SSD)和模型平均法推导出第5百分位有害浓度(HC5)。为了比较,hc5也从三种可选的单一分布模型中得到。硫酸盐敏感性在试验物种之间差异显著。其中最敏感的是普通水苔、欧洲白鱼和凤尾白鱼。波罗的海沿岸地区慢性HC5的95%可信区间为1 204 (472 ~ 2429)mg/L,盐度范围为2 ~ 6‰。为了考虑固态硬盘的不确定性,将HC5除以评估因子(AF),得出预测的无影响浓度(PNEC)。通过计算每个PNEC下受影响物种的百分比来评估不同的AF情景。95%概率保护95%以上物种的PNEC为469 mg/L,对应的AF为2.57,这说明了SSD模型的统计不确定性。与一般生活在淡水生态系统中的物种相比,波罗的海物种对硫酸盐的耐受性明显更高。在这里对波罗的海各种物种进行的毒性试验大大有助于了解咸淡水物种对硫酸盐的敏感性,并推动了咸淡水中风险评估的发展。
{"title":"Ecotoxicological Risk of Sulfate in Baltic Sea Brackish water Assessed Using Model-Averaged Species Sensitivity Distribution.","authors":"Xiaoxuan Hu, Matti T Leppänen, Kari K Lehtonen, Anna K Karjalainen, Johanna Järvistö, Mikko Mäkinen, Rashmika Samarawickrama, Evita Strode, Juha S Karjalainen","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sulfate is a major ion commonly found in natural environments but excess amounts of it can be harmful to aquatic life. Effects of sulfate on freshwater organisms have been explored previously while its effects on brackish water biota are poorly known. The elevating human-induced sulfate load to the Baltic Sea necessitates understanding how brackish water species tolerate the additional sulfate. In this study, we conducted chronic sulfate toxicity tests on species from coastal areas of the Baltic Sea. Species of both freshwater and marine origin in the Baltic Sea were tested. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) with a model-averaging approach was used to derive the 5th percentile hazardous concentration (HC5). For comparison, HC5s were also derived from three alternative single-distribution models. Sulfate sensitivity varied notably between the test species. The most sensitive species were found to be common water moss Fontinalis antipyretica and European whitefish Coregonus lavaretus. The chronic HC5 with 95% confidence interval was 1 204 (472-2429) mg/L for the coastal Baltic Sea areas with a salinity range from 2 to 6‰. To account for SSD uncertainties, the HC5 is divided by the assessment factor (AF) to derive the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC). Different AF scenarios were evaluated through deriving the percentages of species affected under each PNEC. The PNEC that would protect over 95% of species with a 95% probability was 469 mg/L, corresponding to an AF of 2.57, which accounted for the statistical uncertainties from the SSD modeling. Compared to species inhabiting freshwater ecosystems in general, the Baltic Sea species showed significantly higher tolerance to sulfate. The toxicity tests performed here on a wide range of Baltic Sea species significantly contribute to the understanding of sensitivity of brackish water species to sulfate and advanced the development of its risk assessment in brackish water.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Statistical Power in Context: Implications for Regulatory Practices. 背景下统计能力的作用:对监管实践的影响。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag011
Zhenglei Gao, Ludwig A Hothorn, Luke Settles, John W Green

Regulatory risk assessment in ecotoxicology relies heavily on statistical endpoints such as No Observed Effect Concentrations (NOECs) and Effective Concentrations (ECxs). Current practices, as outlined in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidance Document No. 54 (2006) and related guidelines, typically employ decision flowcharts to guide statistical analysis. The flowcharts for NOEC calculations use pre-tests for normality and variance homogeneity to select appropriate statistical tests from pre-defined options, including Williams, Dunnett, step-down Jonckheere-Terpstra, and other tests. While these flowcharts aim to ensure appropriate test selection, our analysis reveals critical limitations in their application to real ecotoxicological data, particularly when dealing with heterogeneous variances and small sample sizes. Through simulation studies and practical data examples, we demonstrate that commonly recommended approaches, including nonparametric tests, can produce misleading results under realistic conditions. Our findings show that robust methods, particularly Welch-type Dunnett's tests, consistently outperform standard approaches when handling heterogeneous variances. Importantly, we emphasize that the goal of statistical analysis should not be to maximize test power for specific data characteristics, but rather to ensure reliable inference across diverse experimental conditions. We propose practical improvements to current guidelines, including: (1) prioritizing robust statistical methods that perform reliably under various conditions, (2) incorporating visual inspections and comprehensive sanity checks, and (3) establishing a public repository for benchmark data and methods. These recommendations aim to enhance the reliability and transparency of statistical analyses in regulatory ecotoxicology, ultimately improving the quality of environmental risk assessments.

生态毒理学中的监管风险评估在很大程度上依赖于统计终点,如无观察效应浓度(NOECs)和有效浓度(ECxs)。正如经济合作与发展组织(OECD)第54号指导文件(2006年)和相关指南所概述的那样,目前的做法通常使用决策流程图来指导统计分析。NOEC计算流程图使用正态性和方差同质性的预测试,从预定义的选项中选择适当的统计测试,包括Williams、Dunnett、降压Jonckheere-Terpstra和其他测试。虽然这些流程图旨在确保适当的测试选择,但我们的分析揭示了它们在实际生态毒理学数据应用中的关键局限性,特别是在处理异质方差和小样本量时。通过仿真研究和实际数据示例,我们证明了通常推荐的方法,包括非参数测试,在现实条件下可能会产生误导性的结果。我们的研究结果表明,稳健的方法,特别是韦尔奇型邓尼特测试,在处理异质方差时始终优于标准方法。重要的是,我们强调统计分析的目标不应该是最大化特定数据特征的测试能力,而是确保在不同的实验条件下进行可靠的推断。我们提出了对当前指南的实际改进,包括:(1)优先考虑在各种条件下可靠执行的健壮统计方法,(2)结合视觉检查和全面的完整性检查,以及(3)建立基准数据和方法的公共存储库。这些建议旨在提高监管生态毒理学统计分析的可靠性和透明度,最终提高环境风险评估的质量。
{"title":"The Role of Statistical Power in Context: Implications for Regulatory Practices.","authors":"Zhenglei Gao, Ludwig A Hothorn, Luke Settles, John W Green","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulatory risk assessment in ecotoxicology relies heavily on statistical endpoints such as No Observed Effect Concentrations (NOECs) and Effective Concentrations (ECxs). Current practices, as outlined in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidance Document No. 54 (2006) and related guidelines, typically employ decision flowcharts to guide statistical analysis. The flowcharts for NOEC calculations use pre-tests for normality and variance homogeneity to select appropriate statistical tests from pre-defined options, including Williams, Dunnett, step-down Jonckheere-Terpstra, and other tests. While these flowcharts aim to ensure appropriate test selection, our analysis reveals critical limitations in their application to real ecotoxicological data, particularly when dealing with heterogeneous variances and small sample sizes. Through simulation studies and practical data examples, we demonstrate that commonly recommended approaches, including nonparametric tests, can produce misleading results under realistic conditions. Our findings show that robust methods, particularly Welch-type Dunnett's tests, consistently outperform standard approaches when handling heterogeneous variances. Importantly, we emphasize that the goal of statistical analysis should not be to maximize test power for specific data characteristics, but rather to ensure reliable inference across diverse experimental conditions. We propose practical improvements to current guidelines, including: (1) prioritizing robust statistical methods that perform reliably under various conditions, (2) incorporating visual inspections and comprehensive sanity checks, and (3) establishing a public repository for benchmark data and methods. These recommendations aim to enhance the reliability and transparency of statistical analyses in regulatory ecotoxicology, ultimately improving the quality of environmental risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-term spatial dynamics of neotropical otter (Lontra longicaudis annectens) during hydroelectric dam construction in southern Mexico. 墨西哥南部水电站建设期间新热带水獭的短期空间动态。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag009
Jenner Rodas-Trejo, José Isaac Ramírez Macías, Héctor Hugo Barradas García, Roberto Antonio Rivera Guzmán

This study documented short-term spatial patterns of the neotropical river otter (Lontra longicaudis annectens) during hydroelectric dam construction in the Grijalva River, Chiapas, Mexico. Weekly systematic surveys were conducted in two zones during 2023-2024 (104 surveys per zone): a construction-Disturbed Zone and a less altered Riparian Zone. Methodological constraints-including absence of pre-construction baselines and a disturbance-gradient rather than control-impact design-limit causal inferences; findings represent preliminary observations temporally correlated with construction activities. Habitat use indices were higher in the Disturbed Zone (0.76 records/km) than the Riparian Zone (0.54 records/km). However, spatial analyses (Kernel density, Getis-Ord Gi*, Ripley's K function) revealed a 2.14 km southeast shift in activity hotspots toward the Riparian Zone during 2024, consistent with potential displacement patterns as construction intensified. Results provide preliminary insights for hydroelectric project management, emphasizing the need for robust pre-construction baseline monitoring and connected riparian corridors to facilitate species movement.

本研究记录了墨西哥恰帕斯州格里哈尔瓦河水电站建设期间新热带水獭(Lontra longicaudis annectens)的短期空间格局。在2023-2024年期间,每周在两个区域进行系统调查(每个区域104次调查):一个建筑干扰区和一个较少变化的河岸区。方法学上的限制——包括缺乏施工前基线和扰动梯度而不是控制影响设计——限制了因果推论;研究结果代表了与建筑活动在时间上相关的初步观察。干扰区生境利用指数(0.76个记录/km)高于河岸区(0.54个记录/km)。然而,空间分析(核密度、Getis-Ord Gi*、Ripley’s K函数)显示,2024年活动热点向河岸带东南方向移动了2.14 km,与建设加剧的潜在位移模式一致。研究结果为水电项目管理提供了初步的见解,强调需要强有力的施工前基线监测和连接的河岸走廊,以促进物种的移动。
{"title":"Short-term spatial dynamics of neotropical otter (Lontra longicaudis annectens) during hydroelectric dam construction in southern Mexico.","authors":"Jenner Rodas-Trejo, José Isaac Ramírez Macías, Héctor Hugo Barradas García, Roberto Antonio Rivera Guzmán","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study documented short-term spatial patterns of the neotropical river otter (Lontra longicaudis annectens) during hydroelectric dam construction in the Grijalva River, Chiapas, Mexico. Weekly systematic surveys were conducted in two zones during 2023-2024 (104 surveys per zone): a construction-Disturbed Zone and a less altered Riparian Zone. Methodological constraints-including absence of pre-construction baselines and a disturbance-gradient rather than control-impact design-limit causal inferences; findings represent preliminary observations temporally correlated with construction activities. Habitat use indices were higher in the Disturbed Zone (0.76 records/km) than the Riparian Zone (0.54 records/km). However, spatial analyses (Kernel density, Getis-Ord Gi*, Ripley's K function) revealed a 2.14 km southeast shift in activity hotspots toward the Riparian Zone during 2024, consistent with potential displacement patterns as construction intensified. Results provide preliminary insights for hydroelectric project management, emphasizing the need for robust pre-construction baseline monitoring and connected riparian corridors to facilitate species movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New approach methodologies for contaminant risk assessment in environmental justice communities: Let's not miss the opportunity. 环境正义社区污染物风险评估的新方法方法:让我们不要错过机会。
IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjag005
Katherine Chong, Sophie Emberley-Korkmaz, Niladri Basu

New approach methodologies (NAMs) are emergent tools and methods that are increasingly being viewed by the regulatory and scientific community as ones that can support or even replace traditional (ie, conventional) approaches for use in chemical hazard, exposure, and risk assessments. New approaches ultimately promise to improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, resource requirements, and ethical challenges associated with conventional assessment approaches. Despite escalating activity in the field, less common in the 'NAMs' discourse is the consideration of the specific priorities and needs of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities. These communities are racialized, marginalized, and low-income communities who face disproportionate health impacts related to environmental contamination. Traditional risk, exposure, and hazard assessment methods have been critiqued as generic, institutionalized, and failing to capture the unique and disproportionate health risks of importance to communities themselves. Despite an understanding of the need to include EJ communities in chemicals management, there remains little to no information on their inclusion in the design of NAMs (which are expected to eventually be adopted for regulatory use). This commentary argues that "now" is the time to ensure that EJ considerations are designed into NAMs, and that EJ communities are meaningfully involved. We separate the paper into sections on exposure, hazard and risk assessment. For each section, we provide some comments on the challenges with conventional methods that have been documented in EJ community contexts, followed by our perspectives on opportunities to build new approaches. We conclude by ideating future directions in three areas: the role of regulatory systems, the design of NAMs for EJ community contexts, and the building of capacity for researchers and EJ communities to collaborate on NAMs design and implementation. With the ultimate goal of more equitable chemicals management, these perspectives and ideas hope to inform the development of EJ community-relevant NAMs.

新方法方法学(NAMs)是新兴的工具和方法,越来越多地被监管界和科学界视为可以支持甚至取代用于化学品危害、暴露和风险评估的传统(即传统)方法。新方法最终有望提高效率、成本效益、资源需求以及与传统评估方法相关的道德挑战。尽管该领域的活动不断升级,但在“NAMs”的话语中,对环境正义(EJ)社区的具体优先事项和需求的考虑并不常见。这些社区是种族化、边缘化和低收入社区,面临与环境污染有关的不成比例的健康影响。传统的风险、暴露和危害评估方法被批评为通用的、制度化的,未能捕捉到对社区本身具有重要意义的独特和不成比例的健康风险。尽管人们了解将EJ群落纳入化学品管理的必要性,但关于将其纳入NAMs设计(预计最终将被采用用于监管用途)的信息仍然很少或没有。这篇评论认为,“现在”是时候确保将EJ考虑因素设计到NAMs中,并且EJ社区有意义地参与其中。我们将论文分为暴露、危害和风险评估三个部分。对于每一部分,我们都对EJ社区环境中记录的传统方法的挑战提供了一些评论,然后是我们对构建新方法的机会的看法。最后,我们从三个方面构想了未来的发展方向:监管系统的作用、针对EJ社区背景的NAMs设计,以及研究人员和EJ社区在NAMs设计和实施方面合作的能力建设。以更公平的化学品管理为最终目标,这些观点和想法希望为EJ社区相关NAMs的发展提供信息。
{"title":"New approach methodologies for contaminant risk assessment in environmental justice communities: Let's not miss the opportunity.","authors":"Katherine Chong, Sophie Emberley-Korkmaz, Niladri Basu","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New approach methodologies (NAMs) are emergent tools and methods that are increasingly being viewed by the regulatory and scientific community as ones that can support or even replace traditional (ie, conventional) approaches for use in chemical hazard, exposure, and risk assessments. New approaches ultimately promise to improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, resource requirements, and ethical challenges associated with conventional assessment approaches. Despite escalating activity in the field, less common in the 'NAMs' discourse is the consideration of the specific priorities and needs of Environmental Justice (EJ) communities. These communities are racialized, marginalized, and low-income communities who face disproportionate health impacts related to environmental contamination. Traditional risk, exposure, and hazard assessment methods have been critiqued as generic, institutionalized, and failing to capture the unique and disproportionate health risks of importance to communities themselves. Despite an understanding of the need to include EJ communities in chemicals management, there remains little to no information on their inclusion in the design of NAMs (which are expected to eventually be adopted for regulatory use). This commentary argues that \"now\" is the time to ensure that EJ considerations are designed into NAMs, and that EJ communities are meaningfully involved. We separate the paper into sections on exposure, hazard and risk assessment. For each section, we provide some comments on the challenges with conventional methods that have been documented in EJ community contexts, followed by our perspectives on opportunities to build new approaches. We conclude by ideating future directions in three areas: the role of regulatory systems, the design of NAMs for EJ community contexts, and the building of capacity for researchers and EJ communities to collaborate on NAMs design and implementation. With the ultimate goal of more equitable chemicals management, these perspectives and ideas hope to inform the development of EJ community-relevant NAMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1