Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives among mothers from a Pelotas Birth Cohort.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005585
Gbènankpon Mathias Houvèssou, Simone Farías-Antúnez, Andréa D Bertoldi, Mariângela Freitas da Silveira
{"title":"Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives among mothers from a Pelotas Birth Cohort.","authors":"Gbènankpon Mathias Houvèssou, Simone Farías-Antúnez, Andréa D Bertoldi, Mariângela Freitas da Silveira","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the prevalence of contraindicated use of combined hormonal contraceptives, progesterone-only contraceptives, and intrauterine devices in mothers participating in the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort according to the WHO medical eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The biological mothers of children belonging to the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort who attended the 48-month follow-up were studied. The 48-month follow-up data were collected from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives was considered to occur when these women presented at least one of the contraindications for the use of modern contraceptives and were using these methods. The prevalence of contraindicated use was calculated according to each independent variable and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyzed sample consisted of 3,053 women who used any modern contraceptive method. The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives totaled 25.9% (95%CI: 24.4-27.5). Combined hormonal contraceptives showed the highest prevalence of contraindicated use (52.1%; 95%CI: 49.3-54.8). The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives methods was greater in women with family income between one and three minimum wages, a 25-30 kg/m2 body mass index, indication by a gynecologist for the used method, and purchasing the contraceptive method at a pharmacy. The higher the women's education, the lower the prevalence of inappropriate use of modern contraceptives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In total, one in four women used modern contraceptives despite showing at least one contraindication. Policies regarding women's reproductive health should be strengthened.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"58 ","pages":"02"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10878683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the prevalence of contraindicated use of combined hormonal contraceptives, progesterone-only contraceptives, and intrauterine devices in mothers participating in the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort according to the WHO medical eligibility criteria.

Methods: The biological mothers of children belonging to the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort who attended the 48-month follow-up were studied. The 48-month follow-up data were collected from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives was considered to occur when these women presented at least one of the contraindications for the use of modern contraceptives and were using these methods. The prevalence of contraindicated use was calculated according to each independent variable and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

Results: The analyzed sample consisted of 3,053 women who used any modern contraceptive method. The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives totaled 25.9% (95%CI: 24.4-27.5). Combined hormonal contraceptives showed the highest prevalence of contraindicated use (52.1%; 95%CI: 49.3-54.8). The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives methods was greater in women with family income between one and three minimum wages, a 25-30 kg/m2 body mass index, indication by a gynecologist for the used method, and purchasing the contraceptive method at a pharmacy. The higher the women's education, the lower the prevalence of inappropriate use of modern contraceptives.

Conclusion: In total, one in four women used modern contraceptives despite showing at least one contraindication. Policies regarding women's reproductive health should be strengthened.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佩洛塔斯出生队列中母亲使用现代避孕药具的禁忌情况。
目的根据世界卫生组织的医疗资格标准,描述参加 2015 年佩洛塔斯出生队列的母亲禁忌使用联合激素避孕药、纯黄体酮避孕药和宫内节育器的情况:研究对象为 2015 年佩洛塔斯出生队列中参加 48 个月随访的儿童的亲生母亲。48 个月随访数据的收集时间为 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。如果这些妇女至少有一项使用现代避孕药具的禁忌症,并且正在使用这些方法,则被视为有使用现代避孕药具的禁忌症。根据每个自变量及其各自的 95% 置信区间 (95%CI) 计算出使用禁忌症的流行率:分析样本包括 3 053 名使用任何现代避孕方法的妇女。现代避孕药具的禁忌使用率为 25.9%(95%CI:24.4-27.5)。复合激素避孕药的禁忌使用率最高(52.1%;95%CI:49.3-54.8)。家庭收入在一至三份最低工资之间、体重指数在 25-30 kg/m2 之间、所使用的避孕方法有妇科医生指 示、在药店购买避孕方法的妇女中,现代避孕方法的禁忌使用率更高。妇女受教育程度越高,不适当使用现代避孕药具的比例越低:总之,每四名妇女中就有一名使用现代避孕药具,尽管她们至少有一项禁忌症。应加强有关妇女生殖健康的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
期刊最新文献
ERRATUM. Public resources on the Brazilian Food and Nutrition Security agenda from 2000 to 2022. Burden of leptospirosis in Brazil in the last decade. Frailty and social network among older Brazilian adults: evidence from ELSI-Brazil. Patterns of self-rated health trajectories and associated factors in ELSA-Brasil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1