Mid-Term and Long-Lasting Psycho-Cognitive Benefits of Bidomain Training Intervention in Elderly Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Ines Ben Ayed, Chirine Aouichaoui, Achraf Ammar, Salma Naija, Oussama Tabka, Haitham Jahrami, Khaled Trabelsi, Yassine Trabelsi, Nicole El Massioui, Farid El Massioui
{"title":"Mid-Term and Long-Lasting Psycho-Cognitive Benefits of Bidomain Training Intervention in Elderly Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Ines Ben Ayed, Chirine Aouichaoui, Achraf Ammar, Salma Naija, Oussama Tabka, Haitham Jahrami, Khaled Trabelsi, Yassine Trabelsi, Nicole El Massioui, Farid El Massioui","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14020019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> This study investigated whether combining simultaneous physical and cognitive training yields superior cognitive outcomes compared with aerobic training alone in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and whether these benefits persist after four weeks of detraining. <i>Methods:</i> Forty-four people with MCI (11 males and 33 females) aged 65 to 75 years were randomly assigned to an 8-week, twice-weekly program of either aerobic training (AT group, <i>n</i> = 15), aerobic training combined with cognitive games (ACT group, <i>n</i> = 15), or simply reading for controls (CG group, <i>n</i> = 14). Selective attention (Stroop), problem-solving (Hanoi Tower), and working memory (Digit Span) tasks were used to assess cognitive performances at baseline, in the 4th (W4) and 8th weeks (W8) of training, and after 4 weeks of rest (W12). <i>Results:</i> Both training interventions induced beneficial effects on all tested cognitive performance at W4 (except for the number of moves in the Hanoi tower task) and W8 (all <i>p</i> <0.001), with the ACT group exhibiting a more pronounced positive impact than the AT group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This advantage was specifically observed at W8 in tasks such as the Stroop and Tower of Hanoi (% gain ≈40% vs. ≈30% for ACT and AT, respectively) and the digit span test (% gain ≈13% vs. ≈10% for ACT and AT, respectively). These cognitive improvements in both groups, with the greater ones in ACT, persisted even after four weeks of detraining, as evidenced by the absence of a significant difference between W8 and W12 (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Concerning neuropsychological assessments, comparable beneficial effects were recorded following both training regimens (all <i>p</i> < 0.05 from pre- to post-intervention). The control group did not show any significant improvement in most of the cognitive tasks. <i>Conclusions:</i> The greater mid-term and long-lasting effects of combined simultaneous physical-cognitive training underscores its potential as a cost-effective intervention for the prevention and management of cognitive decline. While these results are valuable in guiding optimal physical and mental activity recommendations for adults with MCI, further neurophysiological-based studies are essential to offer robust support and deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying these promising findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 2","pages":"284-298"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10887966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14020019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated whether combining simultaneous physical and cognitive training yields superior cognitive outcomes compared with aerobic training alone in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and whether these benefits persist after four weeks of detraining. Methods: Forty-four people with MCI (11 males and 33 females) aged 65 to 75 years were randomly assigned to an 8-week, twice-weekly program of either aerobic training (AT group, n = 15), aerobic training combined with cognitive games (ACT group, n = 15), or simply reading for controls (CG group, n = 14). Selective attention (Stroop), problem-solving (Hanoi Tower), and working memory (Digit Span) tasks were used to assess cognitive performances at baseline, in the 4th (W4) and 8th weeks (W8) of training, and after 4 weeks of rest (W12). Results: Both training interventions induced beneficial effects on all tested cognitive performance at W4 (except for the number of moves in the Hanoi tower task) and W8 (all p <0.001), with the ACT group exhibiting a more pronounced positive impact than the AT group (p < 0.05). This advantage was specifically observed at W8 in tasks such as the Stroop and Tower of Hanoi (% gain ≈40% vs. ≈30% for ACT and AT, respectively) and the digit span test (% gain ≈13% vs. ≈10% for ACT and AT, respectively). These cognitive improvements in both groups, with the greater ones in ACT, persisted even after four weeks of detraining, as evidenced by the absence of a significant difference between W8 and W12 (p > 0.05). Concerning neuropsychological assessments, comparable beneficial effects were recorded following both training regimens (all p < 0.05 from pre- to post-intervention). The control group did not show any significant improvement in most of the cognitive tasks. Conclusions: The greater mid-term and long-lasting effects of combined simultaneous physical-cognitive training underscores its potential as a cost-effective intervention for the prevention and management of cognitive decline. While these results are valuable in guiding optimal physical and mental activity recommendations for adults with MCI, further neurophysiological-based studies are essential to offer robust support and deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying these promising findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双域训练干预对轻度认知障碍老年人的中期和长期心理认知益处
研究背景本研究探讨了在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中,同时进行体能训练和认知训练是否会比单独进行有氧训练产生更好的认知效果,以及这些益处在脱离训练四周后是否会持续。研究方法将 44 名年龄在 65 至 75 岁之间的 MCI 患者(男性 11 人,女性 33 人)随机分配到一个为期 8 周、每周两次的项目中,该项目包括有氧训练(AT 组,n = 15)、有氧训练与认知游戏相结合(ACT 组,n = 15)或单纯的对照阅读(CG 组,n = 14)。选择性注意(Stroop)、问题解决(河内塔)和工作记忆(数字跨度)任务用于评估基线、训练第 4 周(W4)和第 8 周(W8)以及休息 4 周(W12)后的认知表现。结果显示在第 4 周(除了河内塔任务中的移动次数)和第 8 周(所有 p p < 0.05),两种训练干预都对所有测试的认知表现产生了有利影响。这种优势在第 8 个学习阶段的任务中得到了具体体现,如斯特罗普和河内塔(ACT 和 AT 的收益率分别为 ≈40% 和 ≈30%)以及数字跨度测试(ACT 和 AT 的收益率分别为 ≈13% 和 ≈10%)。即使在脱离训练四周后,这两组人的认知能力仍有提高,其中ACT的提高幅度更大,第8周和第12周之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)就是证明。在神经心理评估方面,两种训练方案都产生了类似的有益效果(从干预前到干预后,P 均小于 0.05)。对照组在大多数认知任务方面没有任何明显改善。结论同时进行体能和认知训练可产生更大的中期和长期效果,这凸显了体能和认知训练作为一种具有成本效益的干预措施,在预防和控制认知能力下降方面的潜力。虽然这些结果对指导患有 MCI 的成年人进行最佳的体力和脑力活动建议很有价值,但进一步的神经生理学研究对提供有力的支持和加深我们对这些有希望的研究结果的机制的理解至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
FOBism Unveiled: Quantifying Assimilative Racism within Asians in the United States. The Mental Suffering of Cocaine-Addicted Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Personality Disorders' Prevalence and Their Association with Psychopathological Symptoms. The Role of Family in the Life Satisfaction of Young Adults: An Ecological-Systemic Perspective. Interculturality in the Development of Technology-Mediated Courses for Massive Health Education: A Systematic Review. The Mediating Role of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in the Relationship between Adult Attachment and Quality of Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1