Understanding family-centered care in the NICU: a scoping review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00252
Maria E Franco Fuenmayor, Andrea Fawcett, Katherine E Schwartz, Susan Horner, Malathi Balasundaram, Barbara Lawlor Burke, Katherine A Bean, Laura N Russell, Elizabeth Simonton, Kerri Z Machut, Jessica T Fry
{"title":"Understanding family-centered care in the NICU: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Maria E Franco Fuenmayor, Andrea Fawcett, Katherine E Schwartz, Susan Horner, Malathi Balasundaram, Barbara Lawlor Burke, Katherine A Bean, Laura N Russell, Elizabeth Simonton, Kerri Z Machut, Jessica T Fry","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will aim to identify and categorize the definitions of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) family-centered care (FCC) and its associated concepts. It also aims to identify and categorize the practices and interventions that comprise NICU FCC, and catalog the metrics used to evaluate NICU FCC.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>FCC has been identified as an important element of care for neonates and infants admitted to the NICU, and there is clear evidence that the incorporation of families in care improves clinical outcomes. However, FCC has been linked to numerous associated terms and concepts and lacks a unifying definition or framework, thus limiting the ability to categorize, prioritize, and identify practices and interventions to optimize both institutional approaches for individual centers and for the field at large.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies that include or apply at least one FCC concept or its associated terms will be considered eligible for inclusion. Studies not related exclusively to the NICU will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Several electronic databases and sources of gray literature will be searched from 1992 to the present day. The review will include only full-text studies in English and will be independently screened by a minimum of 2 authors. Data will be extracted using a modified JBI data extraction tool and presented using narrative summaries; concept mapping; and categorization of practices, interventions, and metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review will aim to identify and categorize the definitions of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) family-centered care (FCC) and its associated concepts. It also aims to identify and categorize the practices and interventions that comprise NICU FCC, and catalog the metrics used to evaluate NICU FCC.

Introduction: FCC has been identified as an important element of care for neonates and infants admitted to the NICU, and there is clear evidence that the incorporation of families in care improves clinical outcomes. However, FCC has been linked to numerous associated terms and concepts and lacks a unifying definition or framework, thus limiting the ability to categorize, prioritize, and identify practices and interventions to optimize both institutional approaches for individual centers and for the field at large.

Inclusion criteria: Studies that include or apply at least one FCC concept or its associated terms will be considered eligible for inclusion. Studies not related exclusively to the NICU will be excluded.

Methods: The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Several electronic databases and sources of gray literature will be searched from 1992 to the present day. The review will include only full-text studies in English and will be independently screened by a minimum of 2 authors. Data will be extracted using a modified JBI data extraction tool and presented using narrative summaries; concept mapping; and categorization of practices, interventions, and metrics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解新生儿重症监护室中以家庭为中心的护理:范围界定审查协议。
目的:本范围综述旨在确定新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)以家庭为中心的护理(FCC)的定义及其相关概念,并对其进行分类。它还旨在识别和分类构成新生儿重症监护病房以家庭为中心的护理的实践和干预措施,并对用于评估新生儿重症监护病房以家庭为中心的护理的指标进行编目:FCC 已被确定为新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)新生儿和婴儿护理的一项重要内容,有明确证据表明,将家庭纳入护理可改善临床效果。然而,FCC 与许多相关术语和概念有关,缺乏统一的定义或框架,从而限制了对实践和干预措施进行分类、优先排序和识别的能力,无法优化各个中心和整个领域的机构方法:至少包含或应用一个 FCC 概念或其相关术语的研究将被视为符合纳入标准。与新生儿重症监护病房无关的研究将被排除在外:本综述将遵循 JBI 的范围综述方法,并将使用范围综述的系统综述和 Meta 分析首选报告项目扩展版 (PRISMA-ScR) 进行报告。将检索 1992 年至今的多个电子数据库和灰色文献来源。综述只包括英文全文研究,并由至少两名作者独立筛选。将使用修改后的 JBI 数据提取工具提取数据,并使用叙述性摘要、概念图以及实践、干预措施和衡量标准的分类来呈现数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1