Shockwave therapy and fibromyalgia and its effect on pain, blood markers, imaging, and participant experience - a multidisciplinary randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503
Paolo Sanzo, Martina Agostino, Wesley Fidler, Jane Lawrence-Dewar, Erin Pearson, Carlos Zerpa, Sarah Niccoli, Simon J Lees
{"title":"Shockwave therapy and fibromyalgia and its effect on pain, blood markers, imaging, and participant experience - a multidisciplinary randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Paolo Sanzo, Martina Agostino, Wesley Fidler, Jane Lawrence-Dewar, Erin Pearson, Carlos Zerpa, Sarah Niccoli, Simon J Lees","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with fibromyalgia experience chronic, widespread pain. It remains a misunderstood disorder with multimodal treatments providing mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effects of radial shockwave therapy (RSWT) compared to placebo on pain, pain catastrophizing, psychological indices, blood markers, and neuroimaging. Study-related experiences were also explored qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative sensory testing (QST), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Beighton Scoring Screen (BSS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), blood biomarker (Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10), and brain fMRI were measured pre- and post-treatment along with a post-treatment survey. The RSWT group received five treatments (one week apart over five-week period) to the three most painful areas (500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz, then 1000 shocks at 2 bar and 8 Hz, and finally 500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz) versus sham treatment for the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the BSS for hypermobility (<i>p</i> = .21; <i>d</i> = .74), PCS (<i>p</i> = .70; <i>d</i> = .22), VAS (<i>p = .17-.61</i>; <i>d</i> = .20-.83) scores, QST for skin temperature and stimuli (<i>p = .14-.65</i>; <i>d</i> = .25-.88), and for the pressure pain threshold (<i>p = .71-.93</i>; <i>d</i> = .05-.21). The VAS scores had clinically significant changes (MCID greater than 13.90) with improved pain scores in the RSWT group. Neuroimaging scans revealed no cortical thickness changes. Post-treatment surveys revealed pain and symptom improvements and offered hope to individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSWT was implemented safely, without any negative treatment effects reported, and acted as a pain modulator to reduce sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identification number NCT02760212.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"99-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with fibromyalgia experience chronic, widespread pain. It remains a misunderstood disorder with multimodal treatments providing mixed results.

Objectives: To examine the effects of radial shockwave therapy (RSWT) compared to placebo on pain, pain catastrophizing, psychological indices, blood markers, and neuroimaging. Study-related experiences were also explored qualitatively.

Methods: Quantitative sensory testing (QST), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Beighton Scoring Screen (BSS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), blood biomarker (Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10), and brain fMRI were measured pre- and post-treatment along with a post-treatment survey. The RSWT group received five treatments (one week apart over five-week period) to the three most painful areas (500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz, then 1000 shocks at 2 bar and 8 Hz, and finally 500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz) versus sham treatment for the placebo group.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the BSS for hypermobility (p = .21; d = .74), PCS (p = .70; d = .22), VAS (p = .17-.61; d = .20-.83) scores, QST for skin temperature and stimuli (p = .14-.65; d = .25-.88), and for the pressure pain threshold (p = .71-.93; d = .05-.21). The VAS scores had clinically significant changes (MCID greater than 13.90) with improved pain scores in the RSWT group. Neuroimaging scans revealed no cortical thickness changes. Post-treatment surveys revealed pain and symptom improvements and offered hope to individuals.

Conclusion: RSWT was implemented safely, without any negative treatment effects reported, and acted as a pain modulator to reduce sensitivity.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identification number NCT02760212.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲击波疗法与纤维肌痛及其对疼痛、血液指标、影像学和参与者体验的影响--一项多学科随机对照试验。
背景:纤维肌痛患者会出现慢性、广泛性疼痛。纤维肌痛仍是一种被误解的疾病,多模式治疗的效果参差不齐:研究径向冲击波疗法(RSWT)与安慰剂相比对疼痛、疼痛灾难化、心理指数、血液标志物和神经影像学的影响。此外,还对与研究相关的体验进行了定性探讨:方法:对定量感觉测试(QST)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Beighton 评分筛查(BSS)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、血液生物标志物(白细胞介素(IL)-6 和 IL-10)以及脑部 fMRI 进行治疗前和治疗后测量,并进行治疗后调查。RSWT组在三个最疼痛的部位接受了五次治疗(间隔一周,为期五周)(在1.5巴和15赫兹的压力下冲击500次,然后在2巴和8赫兹的压力下冲击1000次,最后在1.5巴和15赫兹的压力下冲击500次),而安慰剂组则接受了假治疗:BSS中的过度活动度(p = .21;d = .74)、PCS(p = .70;d = .22)、VAS(p = .17-.61;d = .20-.83)评分、QST中的皮肤温度和刺激(p = .14-.65;d = .25-.88)以及压力痛阈值(p = .71-.93;d = .05-.21)差异均无统计学意义。VAS 评分的变化具有临床意义(MCID 大于 13.90),RSWT 组的疼痛评分有所改善。神经影像扫描显示皮质厚度没有变化。治疗后的调查显示疼痛和症状有所改善,给患者带来了希望:临床试验注册:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 识别号 NCT02760212。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
The association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery in patients with musculoskeletal disorders - data from a Swedish RCT in primary care 2009-2011. Static and dynamic balance in physically active females with pronated feet. The effects of inspiratory muscle warm-up prior to inspiratory muscle training during pulmonary rehabilitation in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial. Physical activity promotion in French cystic fibrosis centers: capitalizing on experience. Additional effects of therapeutic exercise and education on manual therapy for chronic temporomandibular disorders treatment: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1