Geographical distribution of clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a scoping review.

Beliu García-Parra, Josep M Guiu, Mónica Povedano, Eduardo L Mariño, Pilar Modamio
{"title":"Geographical distribution of clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a scoping review.","authors":"Beliu García-Parra, Josep M Guiu, Mónica Povedano, Eduardo L Mariño, Pilar Modamio","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2024.2320881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>: Clinical trials location is determined by many factors, including the availability of patient populations, regulatory environment, scientific expertise, and cost considerations. In clinical drug development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), where genetic differences have been described and may be related to geographic setting, this could have implications for the clinical interpretation of results in underrepresented geographic settings. <i>Objective</i>: The aim of this study was to review country participation in ALS clinical research based on available data from clinical trial registries and databases. <i>Methods</i>: We performed a scoping review with available information about clinical trials on ALS in ClinicalTrials.gov (CT), EU clinical trials register (EudraCT), WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Web of Science (WOS). Inclusion criteria were clinical trials in phase 2 and 3 to treat ALS, recruiting or active not recruiting, from 23/06/2018 to 23/06/2023. <i>Results</i>: The total number of clinical trials identified were 188; 54 studies in CT, 38 in EudraCT, 47 in ICTRP and 49 in WOS. We identified 77 clinical trials after deleting duplicates and applying exclusion criteria. The countries with most studies conducted were the US with 35 studies (10.9%), followed by the United Kingdom, Belgium, France and Germany with 21 studies each one of them (6.5%). <i>Conclusion</i>: The data obtained in our review showed a non-homogeneous distribution in clinical trials at the international level, which may influence the interpretation of the results obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2024.2320881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical trials location is determined by many factors, including the availability of patient populations, regulatory environment, scientific expertise, and cost considerations. In clinical drug development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), where genetic differences have been described and may be related to geographic setting, this could have implications for the clinical interpretation of results in underrepresented geographic settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to review country participation in ALS clinical research based on available data from clinical trial registries and databases. Methods: We performed a scoping review with available information about clinical trials on ALS in ClinicalTrials.gov (CT), EU clinical trials register (EudraCT), WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Web of Science (WOS). Inclusion criteria were clinical trials in phase 2 and 3 to treat ALS, recruiting or active not recruiting, from 23/06/2018 to 23/06/2023. Results: The total number of clinical trials identified were 188; 54 studies in CT, 38 in EudraCT, 47 in ICTRP and 49 in WOS. We identified 77 clinical trials after deleting duplicates and applying exclusion criteria. The countries with most studies conducted were the US with 35 studies (10.9%), followed by the United Kingdom, Belgium, France and Germany with 21 studies each one of them (6.5%). Conclusion: The data obtained in our review showed a non-homogeneous distribution in clinical trials at the international level, which may influence the interpretation of the results obtained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌萎缩侧索硬化症临床试验的地理分布:范围界定综述。
导言:临床试验的地点由许多因素决定,包括患者群体的可用性、监管环境、科学专长和成本考虑。在肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)的临床药物开发中,遗传差异已被描述并可能与地理环境有关,这可能会对代表性不足的地理环境中的临床结果解释产生影响。研究目的本研究的目的是根据临床试验登记处和数据库中的现有数据,对各国参与 ALS 临床研究的情况进行回顾。研究方法我们对 ClinicalTrials.gov (CT)、欧盟临床试验注册中心 (EudraCT)、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台 (ICTRP) 和科学网 (WOS) 中有关 ALS 临床试验的现有信息进行了范围界定。纳入标准为2018年6月23日至2023年6月23日期间正在招募或未招募的治疗ALS的2期和3期临床试验。结果:确定的临床试验总数为 188 项,其中 CT 研究 54 项,EudraCT 研究 38 项,ICTRP 研究 47 项,WOS 研究 49 项。在删除重复研究并应用排除标准后,我们确定了 77 项临床试验。开展研究最多的国家是美国,有 35 项研究(10.9%),其次是英国、比利时、法国和德国,各有 21 项研究(6.5%)。结论我们的研究数据显示,国际临床试验的分布并不均匀,这可能会影响对研究结果的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALSUntangled #76: Wahls protocol. Graph theory network analysis reveals widespread white matter damage in brains of patients with classic ALS. Alteration in ornithine metabolism due to mutation in ALDH18A1 masquerading as ALS in pregnancy. Multistep modeling applied to a Malaysian ALS registry. Assessing disease progression in ALS: prognostic subgroups and outliers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1