Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prediction From Whole Slide Images.

Makoto Abe, Fahdi Kanavati, Masayuki Tsuneki
{"title":"Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prediction From Whole Slide Images.","authors":"Makoto Abe, Fahdi Kanavati, Masayuki Tsuneki","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0406-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a histologic type of cancer that exhibits various degrees of keratinization. Identifying lymph node metastasis in SCC is crucial for prognosis and treatment strategies. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in cancer prediction, applications specifically targeting SCC are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To design and validate a deep learning model tailored to predict metastatic SCC in radical lymph node dissection specimens using whole slide images (WSIs).</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Using the EfficientNetB1 architecture, a model was trained on 6587 WSIs (2413 SCC and 4174 nonneoplastic) from several hospitals, encompassing esophagus, head and neck, lung, and skin specimens. The training exclusively relied on WSI-level labels without annotations. We evaluated the model on a test set consisting of 541 WSIs (41 SCC and 500 nonneoplastic) of radical lymph node dissection specimens.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>The model exhibited high performance, with receiver operating characteristic curve areas under the curve between 0.880 and 0.987 in detecting SCC metastases in lymph nodes. Although true positives and negatives were accurately identified, certain limitations were observed. These included false positives due to germinal centers, dust cell aggregations, and specimen-handling artifacts, as well as false negatives due to poor differentiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The developed artificial intelligence model presents significant potential in enhancing SCC lymph node detection, offering workload reduction for pathologists and increasing diagnostic efficiency. Continuous refinement is needed to overcome existing challenges, making the model more robust and clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1344-1351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0406-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a histologic type of cancer that exhibits various degrees of keratinization. Identifying lymph node metastasis in SCC is crucial for prognosis and treatment strategies. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in cancer prediction, applications specifically targeting SCC are limited.

Objective.—: To design and validate a deep learning model tailored to predict metastatic SCC in radical lymph node dissection specimens using whole slide images (WSIs).

Design.—: Using the EfficientNetB1 architecture, a model was trained on 6587 WSIs (2413 SCC and 4174 nonneoplastic) from several hospitals, encompassing esophagus, head and neck, lung, and skin specimens. The training exclusively relied on WSI-level labels without annotations. We evaluated the model on a test set consisting of 541 WSIs (41 SCC and 500 nonneoplastic) of radical lymph node dissection specimens.

Results.—: The model exhibited high performance, with receiver operating characteristic curve areas under the curve between 0.880 and 0.987 in detecting SCC metastases in lymph nodes. Although true positives and negatives were accurately identified, certain limitations were observed. These included false positives due to germinal centers, dust cell aggregations, and specimen-handling artifacts, as well as false negatives due to poor differentiation.

Conclusions.—: The developed artificial intelligence model presents significant potential in enhancing SCC lymph node detection, offering workload reduction for pathologists and increasing diagnostic efficiency. Continuous refinement is needed to overcome existing challenges, making the model more robust and clinically relevant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估从全切片图像预测转移性鳞状细胞癌的深度学习模型
背景:鳞状细胞癌(SCC)是一种组织学类型的癌症,表现出不同程度的角化。识别鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移对预后和治疗策略至关重要。虽然人工智能(AI)在癌症预测方面已显示出前景,但专门针对 SCC 的应用还很有限:利用全切片图像(WSI)设计并验证一种深度学习模型,该模型专门用于预测根治性淋巴结清扫标本中的转移性 SCC:利用 EfficientNetB1 架构,对来自多家医院的 6587 个 WSI(2413 个 SCC 和 4174 个非肿瘤)进行了模型训练,其中包括食管、头颈、肺和皮肤标本。训练完全依赖于没有注释的 WSI 级别标签。我们在由 541 个 WSI(41 个 SCC 和 500 个非肿瘤)组成的根治性淋巴结清扫标本测试集上对该模型进行了评估:该模型在检测淋巴结中的 SCC 转移方面表现出很高的性能,接收者操作特征曲线下面积介于 0.880 和 0.987 之间。虽然真阳性和假阴性都能准确识别,但也发现了一些局限性。这些限制包括由于生殖中心、尘埃细胞聚集和标本处理假象造成的假阳性,以及由于分化不良造成的假阴性:所开发的人工智能模型在加强 SCC 淋巴结检测、减少病理学家工作量和提高诊断效率方面具有巨大潜力。需要不断改进以克服现有的挑战,使模型更加稳健、更贴近临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laboratorian Interpretation of Drug Testing Results in Pain Management: Lessons From College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing. Clot Waveform Analysis: From Hypercoagulability to Hypocoagulability: A Review. Digital Pathology in the Detection of Infectious Microorganisms: An Evaluation of Its Strengths and Weaknesses Across a Panel of Immunohistochemical and Histochemical Stains Routinely Used in Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prediction From Whole Slide Images. Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma With Predominant Tubulocystic Features Mimics Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1