Concordance between freehand SPECT and conventional scintigraphy for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer

Á. Esteban Hurtado , J. Orozco Cortés , P. Cárcamo Ibarra , U. López González , Á. Badenes Romero , M.Á. Navas de la Cruz , C. Siscar Gelo , L. Casas Calabuig , P. Abreu Sánchez , T. Mut Dólera , D. Balaguer Muñoz , M.D. Reyes Ojeda , C. Plancha Mansanet , E. Caballero Calabuig
{"title":"Concordance between freehand SPECT and conventional scintigraphy for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer","authors":"Á. Esteban Hurtado ,&nbsp;J. Orozco Cortés ,&nbsp;P. Cárcamo Ibarra ,&nbsp;U. López González ,&nbsp;Á. Badenes Romero ,&nbsp;M.Á. Navas de la Cruz ,&nbsp;C. Siscar Gelo ,&nbsp;L. Casas Calabuig ,&nbsp;P. Abreu Sánchez ,&nbsp;T. Mut Dólera ,&nbsp;D. Balaguer Muñoz ,&nbsp;M.D. Reyes Ojeda ,&nbsp;C. Plancha Mansanet ,&nbsp;E. Caballero Calabuig","doi":"10.1016/j.remnie.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Freehand SPECT can be a useful imaging technique for preoperative planning of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as it allows localization of the sentinel node by 3D and real-time tomographic imaging and determines its depth after a few minutes of scanning.</p><p>The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between the number of detected SNs between freehand SPECT images and lymphoscintigraphy (LS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>100 patients with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and no clinical evidence of lymph node involvement prospectively underwent SLNB. The preoperative study included freehand SPECT imaging at 15<!--> <!-->min after injection and LS imaging at 25 and 60−90<!--> <!-->min after injection (early and late). The observed agreement was analyzed and a concordance study was performed between the number of SNs detected with freehand SPECT and LS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The observed agreement in the detection of SNs between freehand SPECT and early LS was 72%; between freehand SPECT and late LS was 85%; and between early and late LS was 87%. In the concordance study, there was moderate concordance between freehand SPECT and early LS (kappa coefficient: 0.42); moderate-high concordance between freehand SPECT and late LS (kappa coefficient: 0.60); and moderate-high concordance between early and late LS (kappa coefficient: 0.70), with no significant differences between them (p-value<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.16).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Freehand SPECT showed a moderate-high concordance with conventional imaging studies and could be a valid alternative for the presurgical study of SLNB in breast cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94197,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","volume":"43 2","pages":"Pages 79-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2253808924000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Freehand SPECT can be a useful imaging technique for preoperative planning of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as it allows localization of the sentinel node by 3D and real-time tomographic imaging and determines its depth after a few minutes of scanning.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between the number of detected SNs between freehand SPECT images and lymphoscintigraphy (LS).

Materials and methods

100 patients with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and no clinical evidence of lymph node involvement prospectively underwent SLNB. The preoperative study included freehand SPECT imaging at 15 min after injection and LS imaging at 25 and 60−90 min after injection (early and late). The observed agreement was analyzed and a concordance study was performed between the number of SNs detected with freehand SPECT and LS.

Results

The observed agreement in the detection of SNs between freehand SPECT and early LS was 72%; between freehand SPECT and late LS was 85%; and between early and late LS was 87%. In the concordance study, there was moderate concordance between freehand SPECT and early LS (kappa coefficient: 0.42); moderate-high concordance between freehand SPECT and late LS (kappa coefficient: 0.60); and moderate-high concordance between early and late LS (kappa coefficient: 0.70), with no significant differences between them (p-value = 0.16).

Conclusion

Freehand SPECT showed a moderate-high concordance with conventional imaging studies and could be a valid alternative for the presurgical study of SLNB in breast cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于乳腺癌前哨淋巴结检测的自由SPECT与传统闪烁扫描之间的一致性。
简介徒手SPECT是前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)术前计划的一种有用成像技术,因为它可以通过三维实时断层成像定位前哨淋巴结,并在几分钟的扫描后确定其深度。研究的目的是评估自由手SPECT图像和淋巴管造影(LS)检测到的前哨结数量之间的相关性。材料和方法:100名确诊为浸润性乳腺癌且无淋巴结受累临床证据的患者前瞻性地接受了SLNB。术前研究包括注射后 15 分钟的徒手 SPECT 成像和注射后 25 分钟和 60-90 分钟的 LS 成像(早期和晚期)。对观察到的一致性进行了分析,并对通过徒手 SPECT 和 LS 检测到的 SN 数量进行了一致性研究:结果:观察发现,徒手 SPECT 和早期 LS 检测 SN 的一致性为 72%;徒手 SPECT 和晚期 LS 的一致性为 85%;早期 LS 和晚期 LS 的一致性为 87%。在一致性研究中,徒手SPECT与早期LS的一致性为中度(kappa系数:0.42);徒手SPECT与晚期LS的一致性为中度-高度(kappa系数:0.60);早期和晚期LS的一致性为中度-高度(kappa系数:0.70),两者之间无显著差异(p值=0.16):自由手SPECT与传统影像学研究显示出中等偏上的一致性,可作为乳腺癌SLNB术前研究的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Selective sentinel lymph node biopsy in a tumor on axillary ectopic breast tissue. Portal of entry for Streptococcus gallolyticus in infective endocarditis. Predictive value of metastatic distribution patterns on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy. [18F]FDG PET/CT in pulmonary Castleman's disease. Prognostic value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1