Can epilepsy affect normal EEG variants? A comparative study between subjects with and without epilepsy

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102935
Greta Macorig , Arielle Crespel , Annacarmen Nilo , Ngoc Phuong Loc Tang , Gian Luigi Gigli , Philippe Gélisse
{"title":"Can epilepsy affect normal EEG variants? A comparative study between subjects with and without epilepsy","authors":"Greta Macorig ,&nbsp;Arielle Crespel ,&nbsp;Annacarmen Nilo ,&nbsp;Ngoc Phuong Loc Tang ,&nbsp;Gian Luigi Gigli ,&nbsp;Philippe Gélisse","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the prevalence of benign EEG variants (BEVs) between epileptic and non-epileptic subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, observational EEG study of 1,163 consecutive patients, using the 10–20 international system with systematically two additional anterior/inferior temporal electrodes. The video-EEG monitoring duration was between 24 h and eight days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 917 (78.9%) epileptic patients (mean age: 33.42 ± 15.5 years; females: 53.4%) and 246 (21.2%) non-epileptic patients (mean age: 35.6 ± 18.75 years; females: 54.9%). Despite a shorter mean duration of the EEG recordings, the prevalence of BEVs was higher in non-epileptic vs. epileptic patients (73.2% vs. 57.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.000011). This statistical difference was confirmed for lambda waves (23.6% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 14.8% in the epilepsy group, <em>p</em> = 0.001), POSTs (50.8% vs. 32.5%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.000001), wicket spikes (20.3% vs. 13.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.009) in particular in NREM and REM sleep, and 14- and 6-Hz positive bursts (13% vs. 7.1% <em>p</em> = 0.003). Mu rhythm was observed at the same frequency in both groups (21.1% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 22.7% in the epilepsy group). There was no difference between the two groups for rarer rhythms, such as rhythmic mid-temporal theta burst of drowsiness, small sharp spikes, and midline theta rhythm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no increase in any of the BEVs in the epilepsy group. On the contrary, BEVs were more frequent and diversified in the non-epilepsy group. Epilepsy may negatively affect the occurrence of the most common BEVs, with the exception of the mu rhythm, which is present in about one-fifth of the population with or without epilepsy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 102935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000928/pdfft?md5=c2d64820738e2040286d91b616a0da68&pid=1-s2.0-S0987705323000928-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the prevalence of benign EEG variants (BEVs) between epileptic and non-epileptic subjects.

Methods

A prospective, observational EEG study of 1,163 consecutive patients, using the 10–20 international system with systematically two additional anterior/inferior temporal electrodes. The video-EEG monitoring duration was between 24 h and eight days.

Results

We identified 917 (78.9%) epileptic patients (mean age: 33.42 ± 15.5 years; females: 53.4%) and 246 (21.2%) non-epileptic patients (mean age: 35.6 ± 18.75 years; females: 54.9%). Despite a shorter mean duration of the EEG recordings, the prevalence of BEVs was higher in non-epileptic vs. epileptic patients (73.2% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.000011). This statistical difference was confirmed for lambda waves (23.6% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 14.8% in the epilepsy group, p = 0.001), POSTs (50.8% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.000001), wicket spikes (20.3% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.009) in particular in NREM and REM sleep, and 14- and 6-Hz positive bursts (13% vs. 7.1% p = 0.003). Mu rhythm was observed at the same frequency in both groups (21.1% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 22.7% in the epilepsy group). There was no difference between the two groups for rarer rhythms, such as rhythmic mid-temporal theta burst of drowsiness, small sharp spikes, and midline theta rhythm.

Conclusions

There was no increase in any of the BEVs in the epilepsy group. On the contrary, BEVs were more frequent and diversified in the non-epilepsy group. Epilepsy may negatively affect the occurrence of the most common BEVs, with the exception of the mu rhythm, which is present in about one-fifth of the population with or without epilepsy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫会影响正常脑电图变异吗?癫痫患者与非癫痫患者的比较研究
目的比较癫痫患者和非癫痫患者良性脑电图变异(BEVs)的发生率。方法对 1,163 名连续患者进行前瞻性观察性脑电图研究,采用 10-20 国际系统,系统性地增加两个颞前/颞下电极。结果我们发现了 917 名(78.9%)癫痫患者(平均年龄:33.42 ± 15.5 岁;女性:53.4%)和 246 名(21.2%)非癫痫患者(平均年龄:35.6 ± 18.75 岁;女性:54.9%)。尽管脑电图记录的平均持续时间较短,但非癫痫患者与癫痫患者的 BEVs 发生率更高(73.2% 对 57.8%,p = 0.000011)。这一统计差异在以下方面得到了证实:λ波(非癫痫组 23.6% 对癫痫组 14.8%,p = 0.001)、POSTs(50.8% 对 32.5%,p < 0.000001)、wicket spikes(20.3% 对 13.6%,p = 0.009),尤其是在 NREM 和 REM 睡眠中,以及 14-Hz 和 6-Hz 阳性爆发(13% 对 7.1% p = 0.003)。两组观察到的 Mu 节律频率相同(非癫痫组为 21.1%,癫痫组为 22.7%)。两组在罕见节律方面没有差异,如嗜睡的θ中颞节律性爆发、小尖峰和中线θ节律。相反,非癫痫组的 BEVs 更为频繁和多样化。癫痫可能会对最常见的 BEVs 的出现产生负面影响,但 mu 节律除外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis Transcranial MEPs predict clinical outcome during minimally invasive dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Twenty years of SIRPIDs: What have we learned? Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1