Risk Assessment for Workers with Wearable Medical Devices Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Health physics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000001798
Cecilia Vivarelli, Federica Censi, Giovanni Calcagnini, Rosaria Falsaperla, Eugenio Mattei
{"title":"Risk Assessment for Workers with Wearable Medical Devices Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields.","authors":"Cecilia Vivarelli, Federica Censi, Giovanni Calcagnini, Rosaria Falsaperla, Eugenio Mattei","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The exponential diffusion of wearable medical devices (WMD) in recent years has involved people of all ages, including workers. Workers who use WMDs should be considered at a particular risk from electromagnetic fields, and in accordance with EU Directive 2013/35/EU, they require an individual risk assessment. Currently, there is no international standard that provides specific guidance on how to perform such a risk assessment. This paper focuses on the effects of electromagnetic fields on WMDs and does not consider the direct effects on human body tissues. It aims to offer practical recommendations to employers and/or health physicists for the risk assessment of workers with WMDs. Focusing on EU countries, we first describe the requirements outlined by the technical standard for the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of medical electrical equipment EN 60601-1-2. Then, some general guidelines on how to perform the risk assessment are provided. The assessment can be conducted by comparing the field values measured in the workplace with the immunity test levels specified in the technical standards of medical electrical equipment. If the measured values are lower than the immunity test levels indicated in the standard and the distance from the electromagnetic source is greater than the distance used by the manufacturer during the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) tests (typically 30 cm), the risk for the worker may be considered acceptable. However, if the measured values exceed the immunity test levels or the distance criteria, a specific evaluation based on a case-by-case analysis is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":"269-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The exponential diffusion of wearable medical devices (WMD) in recent years has involved people of all ages, including workers. Workers who use WMDs should be considered at a particular risk from electromagnetic fields, and in accordance with EU Directive 2013/35/EU, they require an individual risk assessment. Currently, there is no international standard that provides specific guidance on how to perform such a risk assessment. This paper focuses on the effects of electromagnetic fields on WMDs and does not consider the direct effects on human body tissues. It aims to offer practical recommendations to employers and/or health physicists for the risk assessment of workers with WMDs. Focusing on EU countries, we first describe the requirements outlined by the technical standard for the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of medical electrical equipment EN 60601-1-2. Then, some general guidelines on how to perform the risk assessment are provided. The assessment can be conducted by comparing the field values measured in the workplace with the immunity test levels specified in the technical standards of medical electrical equipment. If the measured values are lower than the immunity test levels indicated in the standard and the distance from the electromagnetic source is greater than the distance used by the manufacturer during the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) tests (typically 30 cm), the risk for the worker may be considered acceptable. However, if the measured values exceed the immunity test levels or the distance criteria, a specific evaluation based on a case-by-case analysis is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佩戴可穿戴医疗设备的工人暴露于电磁场的风险评估。
摘要:近年来,可穿戴医疗设备(WMD)呈指数级增长,涉及各个年龄段的人群,包括工人。使用 WMD 的工人应被视为具有电磁场的特殊风险,根据欧盟指令 2013/35/EU,他们需要进行个人风险评估。目前,还没有国际标准为如何进行此类风险评估提供具体指导。本文侧重于电磁场对大规模毁灭性武器的影响,而不考虑对人体组织的直接影响。本文旨在为雇主和/或健康物理学家提供实用建议,以便对使用大规模毁灭性武器的工人进行风险评估。以欧盟国家为重点,我们首先介绍了医疗电气设备电磁兼容性 (EMC) 技术标准 EN 60601-1-2 中列出的要求。然后,就如何进行风险评估提供一些一般性指导。可以通过比较工作场所测得的场值和医疗电气设备技术标准中规定的抗扰度测试水平来进行评估。如果测量值低于标准中规定的抗扰度测试水平,且与电磁源的距离大于制造商在 EMC(电磁兼容性)测试中使用的距离(通常为 30 厘米),则可以认为工人面临的风险是可以接受的。但是,如果测量值超过了抗扰度测试水平或距离标准,则需要根据具体情况进行具体分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Design of a Low-cost Radiation Weather Station. HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY . 2025 AFFILIATE MEMBERS. Policy Surveillance Methods Applied to NORM and TENORM Regulation in the Southeast United States. TENORM Regulation in the United States of America post-West Virginia vs. EPA. The Future of Radiation Protection Professionals: Spotlight on Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1