The Multilevel Factor Structure of Social Cohesion, Mutual Efficacy, and Informal Social Control: A Case for Practice-Informed Research.

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Social work Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1093/sw/swae002
Michael C Gearhart
{"title":"The Multilevel Factor Structure of Social Cohesion, Mutual Efficacy, and Informal Social Control: A Case for Practice-Informed Research.","authors":"Michael C Gearhart","doi":"10.1093/sw/swae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collective efficacy is the process by which social cohesion is activated as informal social control. Mutual efficacy, the perceived capability of the community, mediates the relationship between the two constructs. Interventions based on collective efficacy have a positive impact on individuals but are limited in their ability to affect the broader community. A possible explanation for this finding is that community-level theories operate differently at the individual and neighborhood levels. The present study contributes to the literature by testing the multilevel factor structure of social cohesion, mutual efficacy, and informal social control. Findings suggest that multiple-factor structures demonstrate adequate model fit. However, the three-factor model is most consistent with social work theory and practice. Social workers can foster constructive dialogue to build social cohesion, authentically engage residents to build mutual efficacy, and train residents in skills necessary to institute informal social control.</p>","PeriodicalId":21875,"journal":{"name":"Social work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swae002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collective efficacy is the process by which social cohesion is activated as informal social control. Mutual efficacy, the perceived capability of the community, mediates the relationship between the two constructs. Interventions based on collective efficacy have a positive impact on individuals but are limited in their ability to affect the broader community. A possible explanation for this finding is that community-level theories operate differently at the individual and neighborhood levels. The present study contributes to the literature by testing the multilevel factor structure of social cohesion, mutual efficacy, and informal social control. Findings suggest that multiple-factor structures demonstrate adequate model fit. However, the three-factor model is most consistent with social work theory and practice. Social workers can foster constructive dialogue to build social cohesion, authentically engage residents to build mutual efficacy, and train residents in skills necessary to institute informal social control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会凝聚力、相互效能和非正式社会控制的多层次因素结构:基于实践的研究案例
集体效能是社会凝聚力作为非正式社会控制被激活的过程。相互效能感,即社区的感知能力,是这两个概念之间关系的中介。基于集体效能的干预措施对个人有积极影响,但对更广泛社区的影响却有限。对这一发现的可能解释是,社区层面的理论在个人和邻里层面的运作方式不同。本研究通过检验社会凝聚力、相互效能感和非正式社会控制的多层次因素结构,为相关文献做出了贡献。研究结果表明,多因素结构显示出足够的模型拟合度。然而,三因素模型最符合社会工作理论和实践。社会工作者可以促进建设性对话以建立社会凝聚力,真实地与居民互动以建立相互效能感,并培训居民必要的技能以建立非正式的社会控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social work
Social work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introducing Trauma Trigger Fatigue as an Underlying Factor of Social Work Burnout. Professional and Personal Attitudes toward Discussing Sexuality and Degree of Religiosity among Social Workers. Voting: The New Social Determinant of Health and a Long-Standing Concept for Social Work. Ethical Challenges in Social Work Licensing Examinations: A Call for Integrity and Strategies for Success. Exploring the Intention to Engage in Policy Practice: The Role of Values and Career Motivations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1