Validation of the SCORE2 risk prediction algorithm in a Portuguese population: A new model to estimate 10-year cardiovascular disease incidence in Europe

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.repc.2023.10.011
{"title":"Validation of the SCORE2 risk prediction algorithm in a Portuguese population: A new model to estimate 10-year cardiovascular disease incidence in Europe","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.repc.2023.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><p>Subjects without cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) may suffer from subclinical atherosclerosis, and are at increased risk for atherosclerotic CV events (ASCVE). The ESC/EAS risk SCORE was updated by SCORE2, which estimates 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD in European populations aged 40–69 years without established CVD or diabetes. Our aim was to compare the two ESC/EAS risk scores and to validate SCORE2 in our population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 1071 individuals (age 57.2±6.1 years; 75.2% male) without CVD or diabetes, from GENEMACOR study controls, were analyzed over 5.4±3.9 years. The population was stratified into risk categories according to the two scores, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Harrell's C-index assessed the scores’ performance. Calibration was performed using the goodness-of-fit test, and occurrence of the first event assessed by Cox regression. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated SCORE2 survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SCORE stratified subjects into four risk categories: low (7.4%), moderate (46.5%), high (25.3%) and very high (20.8%), and SCORE2 into three: low-to-moderate (24.7%), high (59.0%) and very high (16.2%). SCORE presented good discrimination for CV mortality (AUC=0.838; C-index=0.834, 95% CI: 0.728–0.940), as did SCORE2 for total CV events (AUC=0.744; C-index=0.728, 95% CI: 0.648–0.808). Calibration did not show a disparity between observed and expected ASCVE. The probability of ASCVE was eight times higher in very-high-risk SCORE2 (p=0.001), and three times in the high-risk group (p=0.049). Event-free survival was 99%, 90% and 72% in the low-to-moderate, high and very-high-risk categories, respectively (p&lt;0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SCORE2 improved population stratification by identifying higher-risk patients, enabling early preventive measures. It showed good discriminative ability for all ASCVE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48985,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia","volume":"43 8","pages":"Pages 437-444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255124000660/pdfft?md5=dbdab7da0b8a9d3fc7d831d0df3a5c86&pid=1-s2.0-S0870255124000660-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870255124000660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives

Subjects without cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) may suffer from subclinical atherosclerosis, and are at increased risk for atherosclerotic CV events (ASCVE). The ESC/EAS risk SCORE was updated by SCORE2, which estimates 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD in European populations aged 40–69 years without established CVD or diabetes. Our aim was to compare the two ESC/EAS risk scores and to validate SCORE2 in our population.

Methods

A total of 1071 individuals (age 57.2±6.1 years; 75.2% male) without CVD or diabetes, from GENEMACOR study controls, were analyzed over 5.4±3.9 years. The population was stratified into risk categories according to the two scores, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Harrell's C-index assessed the scores’ performance. Calibration was performed using the goodness-of-fit test, and occurrence of the first event assessed by Cox regression. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated SCORE2 survival.

Results

SCORE stratified subjects into four risk categories: low (7.4%), moderate (46.5%), high (25.3%) and very high (20.8%), and SCORE2 into three: low-to-moderate (24.7%), high (59.0%) and very high (16.2%). SCORE presented good discrimination for CV mortality (AUC=0.838; C-index=0.834, 95% CI: 0.728–0.940), as did SCORE2 for total CV events (AUC=0.744; C-index=0.728, 95% CI: 0.648–0.808). Calibration did not show a disparity between observed and expected ASCVE. The probability of ASCVE was eight times higher in very-high-risk SCORE2 (p=0.001), and three times in the high-risk group (p=0.049). Event-free survival was 99%, 90% and 72% in the low-to-moderate, high and very-high-risk categories, respectively (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

SCORE2 improved population stratification by identifying higher-risk patients, enabling early preventive measures. It showed good discriminative ability for all ASCVE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在葡萄牙人群中验证 SCORE2 风险预测算法:估算欧洲 10 年心血管疾病发病率的新模型。
导言和目标:没有心血管疾病(CV)的人可能患有亚临床动脉粥样硬化,发生动脉粥样硬化性 CV 事件(ASCVE)的风险会增加。ESC/EAS风险SCORE已被SCORE2更新,SCORE2估计了40-69岁未患心血管疾病或糖尿病的欧洲人群10年致命性和非致命性心血管疾病的风险。我们的目的是比较两种ESC/EAS风险评分,并在我国人群中验证SCORE2:我们对来自 GENEMACOR 研究对照组的 1071 人(年龄为 57.2±6.1 岁;75.2% 为男性)进行了为期 5.4±3.9 年的分析,这些人没有心血管疾病或糖尿病。根据两个评分将人群分为不同的风险类别,并用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)和 Harrell's C 指数评估评分的性能。使用拟合优度检验进行校准,并通过 Cox 回归评估首次事件的发生率。卡普兰-梅耶尔分析估计了 SCORE2 的存活率:SCORE将受试者分为四个风险类别:低(7.4%)、中(46.5%)、高(25.3%)和极高(20.8%),SCORE2则分为三个类别:低至中(24.7%)、高(59.0%)和极高(16.2%)。SCORE 对 CV 死亡率有很好的区分度(AUC=0.838;C-index=0.834,95% CI:0.728-0.940),SCORE2 对总 CV 事件也有很好的区分度(AUC=0.744;C-index=0.728,95% CI:0.648-0.808)。校准结果显示,观察到的 ASCVE 与预期的 ASCVE 之间并无差异。极高风险 SCORE2 的 ASCVE 概率高出 8 倍(P=0.001),高风险组高出 3 倍(P=0.049)。中低危、高危和极高危组的无事件生存率分别为 99%、90% 和 72%(p 结论:SCORE2 通过识别高危患者,改善了人群分层,使早期预防措施成为可能。它对所有 ASCVE 均显示出良好的鉴别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia
Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
205
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: The Portuguese Journal of Cardiology, the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, was founded in 1982 with the aim of keeping Portuguese cardiologists informed through the publication of scientific articles on areas such as arrhythmology and electrophysiology, cardiovascular surgery, intensive care, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular imaging, hypertension, heart failure and cardiovascular prevention. The Journal is a monthly publication with high standards of quality in terms of scientific content and production. Since 1999 it has been published in English as well as Portuguese, which has widened its readership abroad. It is distributed to all members of the Portuguese Societies of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, Pneumology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, as well as to leading non-Portuguese cardiologists and to virtually all cardiology societies worldwide. It has been referred in Medline since 1987.
期刊最新文献
When cardiotoxicity demonstrated in cardio-oncology is investigated in other contexts: Research into the cardiovascular effects of antiangiogenic drugs used in ophthalmology. Non-invasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: In the absence of an "Holy Grail", a multiparametric integrative approach may be the key. Premature coronary artery disease primary prevention - Searching for the Holy Grail. Recommendations for the use of natriuretic peptides for early diagnosis of heart disease in patients with diabetes: A consensus report by SPEDM, SPC, NEDM-SPMI and APMGF. Infective endocarditis of the mitral valve with involvement of the left atrium: A rare finding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1