Group peer mentoring to improve faculty connections and enhance mentoring networks

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI:10.1111/tct.13747
Karen P. Barr, Kerry Deluca, Brad E. Dicianno, Wendy M. Helkowski, Betty Liu
{"title":"Group peer mentoring to improve faculty connections and enhance mentoring networks","authors":"Karen P. Barr,&nbsp;Kerry Deluca,&nbsp;Brad E. Dicianno,&nbsp;Wendy M. Helkowski,&nbsp;Betty Liu","doi":"10.1111/tct.13747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Difficulty finding mentors and forging connections in academic departments can be challenging and became even more so when the COVID-19 pandemic reduced opportunities for informal networking. Even as restrictions on in-person meetings eased, many faculty preferred meetings to remain virtual. Because some of the most powerful predictors of faculty vitality are positive professional relationships and feelings of inclusion and belonging to an institution, attending to faculty needs in this area is important to mitigate undesired lingering consequences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>We created structured peer mentoring groups for our department's physicians and psychologists that meet virtually. Groups span career stages, academic appointments and clinical interests. The purpose was to establish a deeper culture of mentoring, increase feelings of connection to a supportive community within the department, facilitate career planning and enhance the development of skills necessary in academic medicine such as teaching skills, scholarly productivity and personal wellness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>A survey conducted after the first year of the programme was completed by 70% of eligible faculty (31/45). Ninety-six percent felt the programme had created an inclusive and appreciative culture, 86% met faculty members they had never met before and 79% sought mentoring advice from a colleague they would not usually have interacted with in that manner. All participants appreciated hearing their colleagues' perspectives on topics they do not typically discuss.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Departmentally based group peer mentoring that spans career stages and interests can facilitate faculty connections and enhance a supportive culture of mentorship.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Difficulty finding mentors and forging connections in academic departments can be challenging and became even more so when the COVID-19 pandemic reduced opportunities for informal networking. Even as restrictions on in-person meetings eased, many faculty preferred meetings to remain virtual. Because some of the most powerful predictors of faculty vitality are positive professional relationships and feelings of inclusion and belonging to an institution, attending to faculty needs in this area is important to mitigate undesired lingering consequences.

Approach

We created structured peer mentoring groups for our department's physicians and psychologists that meet virtually. Groups span career stages, academic appointments and clinical interests. The purpose was to establish a deeper culture of mentoring, increase feelings of connection to a supportive community within the department, facilitate career planning and enhance the development of skills necessary in academic medicine such as teaching skills, scholarly productivity and personal wellness.

Evaluation

A survey conducted after the first year of the programme was completed by 70% of eligible faculty (31/45). Ninety-six percent felt the programme had created an inclusive and appreciative culture, 86% met faculty members they had never met before and 79% sought mentoring advice from a colleague they would not usually have interacted with in that manner. All participants appreciated hearing their colleagues' perspectives on topics they do not typically discuss.

Implications

Departmentally based group peer mentoring that spans career stages and interests can facilitate faculty connections and enhance a supportive culture of mentorship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开展小组同伴指导,改善教师联系,加强指导网络。
背景:在学术部门难以找到导师和建立联系是一项挑战,而当 COVID-19 大流行减少了非正式交流的机会时,情况就变得更加严峻了。即使对面对面会议的限制有所放松,许多教职员工仍倾向于保持虚拟会议。由于教职员工活力的一些最有力的预测因素是积极的职业关系以及对机构的包容和归属感,因此,关注教职员工在这方面的需求对于减轻不良后果非常重要:方法:我们为本部门的医生和心理学家创建了结构化的同行指导小组,并通过虚拟方式举行会议。小组成员跨越职业阶段、学术任命和临床兴趣。目的是建立一种更深层次的指导文化,增强与科室内支持性社区的联系,促进职业规划,并加强学术医学领域必要技能的发展,如教学技能、学术生产力和个人健康:该计划第一年结束后进行了一项调查,有 70% 符合条件的教职员工(31/45)完成了调查。96%的人认为该计划创造了一种包容和欣赏的文化,86%的人认识了他们从未见过的教职员工,79%的人向他们通常不会以这种方式交流的同事寻求指导建议。所有参与者都希望听到同事对他们通常不会讨论的话题的看法:启示:以系为基础、跨越职业阶段和兴趣的小组同伴指导可以促进教职员工之间的联系,增强支持性的指导文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
Supporting Feedback and Trust in CBME: A Conjoint WBA Workshop for Trainers and Trainees Generative Artificial Intelligence and Risk of Premature Expertise: Why Human Judgement Remains Essential in Medical Education Structure and Utility of e-Portfolios for Reflection and Learning in Healthcare Professional Education: A Narrative Review New Associate Editors, New Article Type, New Voices and New Special Issue Education in the Era of Teleneurology: Development and Evaluation of a Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1