Mentored without incubation: Start-up survival, funding, and the role of entrepreneurial support organization services

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.104975
Paige Clayton
{"title":"Mentored without incubation: Start-up survival, funding, and the role of entrepreneurial support organization services","authors":"Paige Clayton","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.104975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper asks how start-ups' participation in a mentoring program relates to finance and survival outcomes and how these outcomes differ for mentored firms compared to non-mentored and incubated firms in the same region. Drawing on the entrepreneurial support organization, mentoring, and innovation literatures, I posit that mentored firms will perform better than non-mentored firms, and that the specific micro-mechanisms of mentoring will lead to varied finance and survival outcomes for mentored as compared to incubated start-ups. Exploiting detailed data on the universe of entrepreneurial life sciences firms in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina over a 25-year time period and matching methods, results indicate that mentored firms perform better in terms of finance than non-mentored firms. Exploratory empirical extensions reveal mentored firms receive greater private and federal public funding than incubated firms, but not local public funding. Neither mentoring nor incubation services relate to survival outcomes. The paper concludes with practical implications for entrepreneurial support organization managers and economic development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper asks how start-ups' participation in a mentoring program relates to finance and survival outcomes and how these outcomes differ for mentored firms compared to non-mentored and incubated firms in the same region. Drawing on the entrepreneurial support organization, mentoring, and innovation literatures, I posit that mentored firms will perform better than non-mentored firms, and that the specific micro-mechanisms of mentoring will lead to varied finance and survival outcomes for mentored as compared to incubated start-ups. Exploiting detailed data on the universe of entrepreneurial life sciences firms in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina over a 25-year time period and matching methods, results indicate that mentored firms perform better in terms of finance than non-mentored firms. Exploratory empirical extensions reveal mentored firms receive greater private and federal public funding than incubated firms, but not local public funding. Neither mentoring nor incubation services relate to survival outcomes. The paper concludes with practical implications for entrepreneurial support organization managers and economic development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有指导无孵化:初创企业的生存、资金和创业支持组织服务的作用
本文探讨了初创企业参与指导计划与融资和生存结果之间的关系,以及在同一地区,接受指导的企业与未接受指导的企业和接受孵化的企业相比,这些结果有何不同。借鉴创业支持组织、指导和创新方面的文献,我假定接受指导的企业将比未接受指导的企业表现更好,而指导的特定微观机制将导致接受指导的初创企业与接受孵化的初创企业在融资和生存结果上的不同。利用北卡罗来纳州研究三角区 25 年间创业型生命科学公司的详细数据和匹配方法,结果表明,接受指导的公司在融资方面的表现优于未接受指导的公司。探索性的经验扩展表明,接受指导的企业比接受孵化的企业获得更多的私人和联邦公共资金,但不包括地方公共资金。指导和孵化服务都与生存结果无关。本文最后提出了对创业支持组织管理者和经济发展的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the governance of failure for radical innovation: The role of strategic leaders How media portrayal of CEO overconfidence impacts radical innovation The determinants of parallel invention: Measuring the role of information sharing and personal interaction between inventors Do the elite university projects promote scientific research competitiveness: Evidence from NSFC grants The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1