L’échelle Positive and Negative Affect Schedule abrégée en langue française : développement, validation et comparaison de ses propriétés psychométriques avec les autres versions courtes
{"title":"L’échelle Positive and Negative Affect Schedule abrégée en langue française : développement, validation et comparaison de ses propriétés psychométriques avec les autres versions courtes","authors":"F. Boiroux","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->201 students, sample 2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->319 working people, sample 3<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"74 3","pages":"Article 100853"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908822001049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects.
Objective
The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007).
Method
Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1 = 201 students, sample 2 = 319 working people, sample 3 = 527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales.
Results
The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985).
Conclusion
This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.