首页 > 最新文献

European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee最新文献

英文 中文
Questioning the beauty premium: The substitution effect of trust on facial attractiveness 质疑美貌溢价:信任对面部吸引力的替代效应
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101117
Lu Cheng , Qingguo Ma , Yulin Tan , Yijin He , Guanxiong Pei , Wenwei Qiu

Introduction

Beauty premium belongs to an innate human behaviour bias and has severely affected social justice and social development. It is an interesting question that how much beauty is actually worth. The more interesting point that has not been studied is whether the effect of beauty can be substituted by social influence, such as trust. This study investigated these issues by using a modified trust game.

Method

314 male participants were recruited as trustees determined what proportion of the investment income would be returned to female trustors who had different attractiveness levels. Three investment levels, i.e., CNY 1, 3, and 5 (meaning low, medium, high trust levels), were designed to explore the influence of trust level on return rate. The marginal effect of beauty was calculated at each of three trust levels, and the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between beauty and trust was explored based on a mixed-effect model.

Results

Regression models implied a strongly positive linear relationship between facial attractiveness and reciprocal behaviour. And results showed an increase of one unit in facial attractiveness leads to a 24.0%, 21.2%, 21.9% increase in return rate for low, medium and high trust levels respectively. Results also indicated that the effect of attractiveness on return rates is moderated by trust. The MRS of trust for facial attractiveness was also calculated to represent the rate at which trust can substitute for attractiveness while maintaining the same return rate.

Discussion

This study suggested that the value of beauty can be reflected in the specific amount of money and that the marginal effect of beauty varies with trust levels. This study also found a substitution effect of trust for beauty and proposed the marginal rate of beauty-trust substitution.
美貌溢价属于一种人类与生俱来的行为偏见,严重影响了社会公正和社会发展。美丽到底值多少钱,这是一个有趣的问题。更有趣的一点尚未被研究的是,美貌的作用是否可以被社会影响(如信任)所取代。本研究通过一个改进的信任博弈来探讨这些问题。方法招募314名男性参与者作为受托人,决定将投资收益的比例返还给具有不同吸引力水平的女性受托人。我们设计了3个投资水平,即人民币1元、3元、5元(即低、中、高信任水平)来探讨信任水平对回报率的影响。在三个信任水平上分别计算美对信任的边际效应,并基于混合效应模型探讨美与信任之间的边际替代率。结果回归模型表明,面部吸引力与互惠行为之间存在显著的正线性关系。结果表明,面部吸引力每增加1个单位,低、中、高信任度的信任度分别增加24.0%、21.2%、21.9%。结果还表明,吸引力对回报率的影响受到信任的调节。我们还计算了信任对面部吸引力的MRS,以表示信任在保持相同回报率的情况下可以替代吸引力的比率。本研究表明,美貌的价值可以体现在具体的金钱数量上,美貌的边际效应随信任水平而变化。本研究还发现信任对美貌存在替代效应,并提出美貌-信任替代的边际率。
{"title":"Questioning the beauty premium: The substitution effect of trust on facial attractiveness","authors":"Lu Cheng ,&nbsp;Qingguo Ma ,&nbsp;Yulin Tan ,&nbsp;Yijin He ,&nbsp;Guanxiong Pei ,&nbsp;Wenwei Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101117","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101117","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Beauty premium belongs to an innate human behaviour bias and has severely affected social justice and social development. It is an interesting question that how much beauty is actually worth. The more interesting point that has not been studied is whether the effect of beauty can be substituted by social influence, such as trust. This study investigated these issues by using a modified trust game.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>314 male participants were recruited as trustees determined what proportion of the investment income would be returned to female trustors who had different attractiveness levels. Three investment levels, i.e., CNY 1, 3, and 5 (meaning low, medium, high trust levels), were designed to explore the influence of trust level on return rate. The marginal effect of beauty was calculated at each of three trust levels, and the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between beauty and trust was explored based on a mixed-effect model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regression models implied a strongly positive linear relationship between facial attractiveness and reciprocal behaviour. And results showed an increase of one unit in facial attractiveness leads to a 24.0%, 21.2%, 21.9% increase in return rate for low, medium and high trust levels respectively. Results also indicated that the effect of attractiveness on return rates is moderated by trust. The MRS of trust for facial attractiveness was also calculated to represent the rate at which trust can substitute for attractiveness while maintaining the same return rate.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study suggested that the value of beauty can be reflected in the specific amount of money and that the marginal effect of beauty varies with trust levels. This study also found a substitution effect of trust for beauty and proposed the marginal rate of beauty-trust substitution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
La dimensionnalité du questionnaire de soutien social ÉPS-10 PSP -10社会支持问卷的维度
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101082
Philippe Rousselle, François Vigneau

Introduction

The brief French-language social support questionnaire EPS-10 (Caron, 2013) was developed in the multidimensional approach to social support of the original Social Provisions Scale (Cutrona and Russell, 1987). According to Caron (2013), the EPS-10 includes five dimensions: attachment, social integration, reassurance of worth, tangible help, and guidance.

Objectives

This study assessed the dimensionality of the EPS-10 and examined the external validity of the EPS-10 dimensions suggested by Caron (2013).

Method

EPS-10 data from the Canadian Community Health Survey – Mental Health Component (CCHS 2012) (4344 respondents) were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The external validity of the total score and the suggested dimension scores was assessed through correlations with three criterion health variables: psychological distress, positive mental health and perceived health.

Results

Principal component analysis of the EPS-10 revealed a single dimension of social support. Confirmatory factor analyses of various models were also consistent with a unidimensional interpretation of the EPS-10 scores. Although the reliability of the total score was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92), the reliabilities of the suggested dimension scores were moderate. The dimension scores did not show evidence of differential validity with respect to the health variables examined.

Conclusion

Given the factor analytic results and the lack of external validity exhibited by suggested dimensions, the use of dimension scores from the EPS-10 is not recommended.
简要的法语社会支持问卷EPS-10 (Caron, 2013)是在原始社会保障量表(Cutrona and Russell, 1987)的多维社会支持方法基础上开发的。根据Caron(2013)的研究,EPS-10包括五个维度:依恋、社会融合、价值保证、有形帮助和指导。目的本研究评估了EPS-10的维度,并检验了Caron(2013)提出的EPS-10维度的外部效度。方法对来自加拿大社区健康调查-心理健康部分(CCHS 2012)(4344名受访者)的deps -10数据进行探索性和验证性因素分析。通过与心理困扰、积极心理健康和感知健康三个标准健康变量的相关性来评估总分和建议维度得分的外部效度。结果主成分分析显示社会支持的维度单一。各种模型的验证性因素分析也与EPS-10评分的单向度解释一致。虽然总得分的信度令人满意(Cronbach's alpha为0.92),但建议维度得分的信度一般。维度得分没有显示出与所检查的健康变量相关的差异效度的证据。结论考虑到因子分析结果和建议的维度缺乏外部效度,不建议使用EPS-10的维度得分。
{"title":"La dimensionnalité du questionnaire de soutien social ÉPS-10","authors":"Philippe Rousselle,&nbsp;François Vigneau","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101082","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101082","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The brief French-language social support questionnaire EPS-10 (Caron, 2013) was developed in the multidimensional approach to social support of the original Social Provisions Scale (Cutrona and Russell, 1987). According to Caron (2013), the EPS-10 includes five dimensions: attachment, social integration, reassurance of worth, tangible help, and guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study assessed the dimensionality of the EPS-10 and examined the external validity of the EPS-10 dimensions suggested by Caron (2013).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>EPS-10 data from the Canadian Community Health Survey – Mental Health Component (CCHS 2012) (4344 respondents) were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The external validity of the total score and the suggested dimension scores was assessed through correlations with three criterion health variables: psychological distress, positive mental health and perceived health.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Principal component analysis of the EPS-10 revealed a single dimension of social support. Confirmatory factor analyses of various models were also consistent with a unidimensional interpretation of the EPS-10 scores. Although the reliability of the total score was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92), the reliabilities of the suggested dimension scores were moderate. The dimension scores did not show evidence of differential validity with respect to the health variables examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given the factor analytic results and the lack of external validity exhibited by suggested dimensions, the use of dimension scores from the EPS-10 is not recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145684509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tilt in Video Gaming: Development and Validation of the Video Gaming Tilt Scale (VGTS) 电子游戏中的倾斜:电子游戏倾斜量表(VGTS)的开发和验证
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101100
Emeline Chauchard , Marie Dupau , Yasser Khazaal , Axelle Moreau

Objective

Tilt refers to a decrease in playing abilities, due to sudden manifestations of negative emotions (anger or frustration) and engagement in more aggressive behaviour within game play. Tilt is commonly experienced by gamers. The purpose of this article is to assess the psychometric properties of the Video Gaming Tilt Scale (VGTS).

Method

A sample of 454 players (81.7% men) completed a set of questionnaires comprising the VGTS and questionnaires assessing internet gaming disorder, anger, impulsivity, anxiety, and depression. The total sample was randomly divided into two distinct samples of a similar size, Group A and Group B, to conduct exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

Results

The exploratory factor analysis identified two factors of equal weight and fitted the data from Group A well. The confirmatory factor analysis reported an excellent fit with the data for Group B. Internal reliability was good and the correlation between the two factors was moderate.

Conclusion

The first factor, “Emotion dysregulation” describes the emotional dysregulation of tilt, particularly anger. The second factor, “cognitive dysregulation” measures cognitive dysregulation and its impact on decision-making and strategy judgement. This scale can contribute to a new area of research focusing on the role of emotion regulation in the trajectories of gamers and problem gamers.
ObjectiveTilt指的是由于消极情绪(愤怒或沮丧)的突然表现以及在游戏过程中出现更具攻击性的行为而导致的游戏能力下降。倾斜是游戏玩家的常见体验。本文的目的是评估电子游戏倾斜量表(VGTS)的心理测量特性。方法对454名网络游戏玩家(81.7%为男性)进行问卷调查,包括VGTS和评估网络游戏障碍、愤怒、冲动、焦虑和抑郁的问卷。将总样本随机分为a组和B组两个大小相近的不同样本,进行探索性和验证性因素分析。结果探索性因子分析确定了两个权重相等的因子,A组数据拟合良好。验证性因子分析与b组的数据吻合良好,内部信度良好,两因素之间的相关性适中。结论第一个因素“情绪失调”描述了倾斜症的情绪失调,尤其是愤怒。第二个因素“认知失调”衡量认知失调及其对决策和战略判断的影响。这个量表可以为关注玩家和问题玩家轨迹中情绪调节作用的研究开辟一个新领域。
{"title":"Tilt in Video Gaming: Development and Validation of the Video Gaming Tilt Scale (VGTS)","authors":"Emeline Chauchard ,&nbsp;Marie Dupau ,&nbsp;Yasser Khazaal ,&nbsp;Axelle Moreau","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101100","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101100","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Tilt refers to a decrease in playing abilities, due to sudden manifestations of negative emotions (anger or frustration) and engagement in more aggressive behaviour within game play. Tilt is commonly experienced by gamers. The purpose of this article is to assess the psychometric properties of the Video Gaming Tilt Scale (VGTS).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A sample of 454 players (81.7% men) completed a set of questionnaires comprising the VGTS and questionnaires assessing internet gaming disorder, anger, impulsivity, anxiety, and depression. The total sample was randomly divided into two distinct samples of a similar size, Group A and Group B, to conduct exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The exploratory factor analysis identified two factors of equal weight and fitted the data from Group A well. The confirmatory factor analysis reported an excellent fit with the data for Group B. Internal reliability was good and the correlation between the two factors was moderate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The first factor, “Emotion dysregulation” describes the emotional dysregulation of tilt, particularly anger. The second factor, “cognitive dysregulation” measures cognitive dysregulation and its impact on decision-making and strategy judgement. This scale can contribute to a new area of research focusing on the role of emotion regulation in the trajectories of gamers and problem gamers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric properties of the 10-item English-language Social Provisions Scale 十项英语社会保障量表的心理测量特性
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101098
François Vigneau , Philippe Rousselle , Dalton Breno Costa

Introduction

One of the most widely used self-report questionnaires to assess perceived social support is the Social Provisions Scale (SPS; Cutrona & Russell, 1987). This 24-item scale was designed to measure six dimensions of social support. A brief, 10-item version of the SPS was developed by Caron (SPS-10; Caron, 2013).

Objectives

This study examined the reliability, dimensionality and criterion validity of the English-language SPS-10.

Method

SPS-10 data from 19,656 respondents (8,928 men and 10,728 women) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The external validity of the total score and the suggested dimension scores was assessed through correlations with three criterion health variables: psychological distress, positive mental health, and perceived health.

Results

Principal component analysis of the SPS-10 revealed a single dimension of social support. Confirmatory factor analyses of various models were also consistent with a unidimensional interpretation of the SPS-10 scores. Although the reliability of the total score was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.93), the reliabilities of the suggested dimension scores were moderate. The dimension scores do not show evidence of differential validity with respect to the health variables examined.

Conclusion

In light of the results of various factor analyses and given the lack of external validity exhibited by the suggested dimensions, SPS-10 scores are best conceptualized as unidimensional. The use of SPS-10 dimension scores is not recommended.
社会保障量表(social Provisions Scale, SPS; Cutrona & Russell, 1987)是应用最广泛的评估感知社会支持的自我报告问卷之一。这个24项的量表被设计用来测量社会支持的六个维度。Caron (SPS-10; Caron, 2013)开发了一个简短的10项SPS版本。目的检验英语SPS-10量表的信度、维度和效度。方法对加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS) 19,656名调查对象(8,928名男性和10,728名女性)的sps -10数据进行探索性和验证性因素分析。通过与心理困扰、积极心理健康和感知健康三个标准健康变量的相关性来评估总分和建议维度得分的外部效度。结果社会支持量表主成分分析显示社会支持维度单一。各种模型的验证性因素分析也与SPS-10分数的单向度解释一致。虽然总得分的信度令人满意(Cronbach 's alpha系数为0.93),但建议维度得分的信度一般。维度得分没有显示出与所检查的健康变量相关的差异效度证据。结论根据各种因素分析的结果,并考虑到所建议的维度缺乏外部效度,SPS-10得分最好被概念化为一维。不建议使用SPS-10维度评分。
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the 10-item English-language Social Provisions Scale","authors":"François Vigneau ,&nbsp;Philippe Rousselle ,&nbsp;Dalton Breno Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101098","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101098","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>One of the most widely used self-report questionnaires to assess perceived social support is the Social Provisions Scale (SPS; <span><span>Cutrona &amp; Russell, 1987</span></span>). This 24-item scale was designed to measure six dimensions of social support. A brief, 10-item version of the SPS was developed by Caron (SPS-10; <span><span>Caron, 2013</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study examined the reliability, dimensionality and criterion validity of the English-language SPS-10.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>SPS-10 data from 19,656 respondents (8,928 men and 10,728 women) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The external validity of the total score and the suggested dimension scores was assessed through correlations with three criterion health variables: psychological distress, positive mental health, and perceived health.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Principal component analysis of the SPS-10 revealed a single dimension of social support. Confirmatory factor analyses of various models were also consistent with a unidimensional interpretation of the SPS-10 scores. Although the reliability of the total score was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.93), the reliabilities of the suggested dimension scores were moderate. The dimension scores do not show evidence of differential validity with respect to the health variables examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In light of the results of various factor analyses and given the lack of external validity exhibited by the suggested dimensions, SPS-10 scores are best conceptualized as unidimensional. The use of SPS-10 dimension scores is not recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101098"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145159983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric properties of the 10-item English-language Social Provisions Scale 十项英语社会保障量表的心理测量特性
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101098
François Vigneau , Philippe Rousselle , Dalton Breno Costa

Introduction

One of the most widely used self-report questionnaires to assess perceived social support is the Social Provisions Scale (SPS; Cutrona & Russell, 1987). This 24-item scale was designed to measure six dimensions of social support. A brief, 10-item version of the SPS was developed by Caron (SPS-10; Caron, 2013).

Objectives

This study examined the reliability, dimensionality and criterion validity of the English-language SPS-10.

Method

SPS-10 data from 19,656 respondents (8,928 men and 10,728 women) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The external validity of the total score and the suggested dimension scores was assessed through correlations with three criterion health variables: psychological distress, positive mental health, and perceived health.

Results

Principal component analysis of the SPS-10 revealed a single dimension of social support. Confirmatory factor analyses of various models were also consistent with a unidimensional interpretation of the SPS-10 scores. Although the reliability of the total score was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.93), the reliabilities of the suggested dimension scores were moderate. The dimension scores do not show evidence of differential validity with respect to the health variables examined.

Conclusion

In light of the results of various factor analyses and given the lack of external validity exhibited by the suggested dimensions, SPS-10 scores are best conceptualized as unidimensional. The use of SPS-10 dimension scores is not recommended.
社会保障量表(social Provisions Scale, SPS; Cutrona & Russell, 1987)是应用最广泛的评估感知社会支持的自我报告问卷之一。这个24项的量表被设计用来测量社会支持的六个维度。Caron (SPS-10; Caron, 2013)开发了一个简短的10项SPS版本。目的检验英语SPS-10量表的信度、维度和效度。方法对加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS) 19,656名调查对象(8,928名男性和10,728名女性)的sps -10数据进行探索性和验证性因素分析。通过与心理困扰、积极心理健康和感知健康三个标准健康变量的相关性来评估总分和建议维度得分的外部效度。结果社会支持量表主成分分析显示社会支持维度单一。各种模型的验证性因素分析也与SPS-10分数的单向度解释一致。虽然总得分的信度令人满意(Cronbach 's alpha系数为0.93),但建议维度得分的信度一般。维度得分没有显示出与所检查的健康变量相关的差异效度证据。结论根据各种因素分析的结果,并考虑到所建议的维度缺乏外部效度,SPS-10得分最好被概念化为一维。不建议使用SPS-10维度评分。
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the 10-item English-language Social Provisions Scale","authors":"François Vigneau ,&nbsp;Philippe Rousselle ,&nbsp;Dalton Breno Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101098","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101098","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>One of the most widely used self-report questionnaires to assess perceived social support is the Social Provisions Scale (SPS; <span><span>Cutrona &amp; Russell, 1987</span></span>). This 24-item scale was designed to measure six dimensions of social support. A brief, 10-item version of the SPS was developed by Caron (SPS-10; <span><span>Caron, 2013</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study examined the reliability, dimensionality and criterion validity of the English-language SPS-10.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>SPS-10 data from 19,656 respondents (8,928 men and 10,728 women) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The external validity of the total score and the suggested dimension scores was assessed through correlations with three criterion health variables: psychological distress, positive mental health, and perceived health.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Principal component analysis of the SPS-10 revealed a single dimension of social support. Confirmatory factor analyses of various models were also consistent with a unidimensional interpretation of the SPS-10 scores. Although the reliability of the total score was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.93), the reliabilities of the suggested dimension scores were moderate. The dimension scores do not show evidence of differential validity with respect to the health variables examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In light of the results of various factor analyses and given the lack of external validity exhibited by the suggested dimensions, SPS-10 scores are best conceptualized as unidimensional. The use of SPS-10 dimension scores is not recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101098"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145160057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A French Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (F-DERS-SF): Validation in an adolescent sample 法文情绪调节困难量表简表(F-DERS-SF):在青少年样本中的验证
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101119
Marbella Pérez-Peña, Pierre Philippot

Introduction

Emotion dysregulation (ED) is the inability to cope with emotional experiences and leverage them in line with one’s goals. The short version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation scale (DERS-SF) is a commonly used measure of ED that has not yet been validated in a francophone adolescent sample.

Objective

The aim of the present study is to validate a French version of the DERS-SF (F-DERS-SF) and assess its psychometric properties in a sample of adolescents.

Method

To achieve this, 139 adolescents aged 14 to 18 (M = 16.58; SD = 0.80) completed the F-DERS-SF, a mindfulness, and an emotional distress questionnaire. A sub-sample of participants (n = 33) completed the F-DERS-SF a second time after 15 days. Factor structure, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Two alternative models were run for comparison purposes.

Results

The correlated six-factor model of the original version displayed good model fit and excellent reliability and validity for all subscales except for the Awareness subscale. The alternative five-factor model excluding Awareness showed the best model fit and psychometric properties among the models tested.

Conclusion

The F-DERS-SF can be used for research and clinical purposes in a population of adolescents. The present study’s results suggest that all subscale scores can be used reliably except for the Awareness subscale. If the Awareness subscale is used, we advise a cautious interpretation of its results.
情绪失调(ED)是指无法处理情绪体验并利用它们来实现自己的目标。简短版本的情绪调节困难量表(DERS-SF)是一种常用的ED测量方法,尚未在讲法语的青少年样本中得到验证。目的验证法语版的心理特征量表(F-DERS-SF),并评估其在青少年样本中的心理测量特性。方法139名14 ~ 18岁青少年(M = 16.58; SD = 0.80)完成了F-DERS-SF、正念和情绪困扰问卷。参与者的子样本(n = 33)在15天后第二次完成F-DERS-SF。评估因子结构、重测信度、内部一致性信度及收敛效度。为了进行比较,我们运行了两个可供选择的模型。结果原始版本的相关六因素模型模型拟合良好,除意识子量表外,其余子量表均具有良好的信度和效度。排除意识的备选五因素模型在被测模型中表现出最佳的模型拟合和心理测量特性。结论F-DERS-SF可用于青少年人群的研究和临床目的。本研究的结果表明,所有的子量表得分可以可靠地使用,除了意识子量表。如果使用意识子量表,我们建议对其结果进行谨慎的解释。
{"title":"A French Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (F-DERS-SF): Validation in an adolescent sample","authors":"Marbella Pérez-Peña,&nbsp;Pierre Philippot","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101119","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101119","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Emotion dysregulation (ED) is the inability to cope with emotional experiences and leverage them in line with one’s goals. The short version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation scale (DERS-SF) is a commonly used measure of ED that has not yet been validated in a francophone adolescent sample.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the present study is to validate a French version of the DERS-SF (F-DERS-SF) and assess its psychometric properties in a sample of adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>To achieve this, 139 adolescents aged 14 to 18 (<em>M</em> = 16.58; <em>SD</em> = 0.80) completed the F-DERS-SF, a mindfulness, and an emotional distress questionnaire. A sub-sample of participants (<em>n</em> = 33) completed the F-DERS-SF a second time after 15 days. Factor structure, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Two alternative models were run for comparison purposes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The correlated six-factor model of the original version displayed good model fit and excellent reliability and validity for all subscales except for the Awareness subscale. The alternative five-factor model excluding Awareness showed the best model fit and psychometric properties among the models tested.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The F-DERS-SF can be used for research and clinical purposes in a population of adolescents. The present study’s results suggest that all subscale scores can be used reliably except for the Awareness subscale. If the Awareness subscale is used, we advise a cautious interpretation of its results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145159981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A French Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (F-DERS-SF): Validation in an adolescent sample 法文情绪调节困难量表简表(F-DERS-SF):在青少年样本中的验证
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101119
Marbella Pérez-Peña, Pierre Philippot

Introduction

Emotion dysregulation (ED) is the inability to cope with emotional experiences and leverage them in line with one’s goals. The short version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation scale (DERS-SF) is a commonly used measure of ED that has not yet been validated in a francophone adolescent sample.

Objective

The aim of the present study is to validate a French version of the DERS-SF (F-DERS-SF) and assess its psychometric properties in a sample of adolescents.

Method

To achieve this, 139 adolescents aged 14 to 18 (M = 16.58; SD = 0.80) completed the F-DERS-SF, a mindfulness, and an emotional distress questionnaire. A sub-sample of participants (n = 33) completed the F-DERS-SF a second time after 15 days. Factor structure, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Two alternative models were run for comparison purposes.

Results

The correlated six-factor model of the original version displayed good model fit and excellent reliability and validity for all subscales except for the Awareness subscale. The alternative five-factor model excluding Awareness showed the best model fit and psychometric properties among the models tested.

Conclusion

The F-DERS-SF can be used for research and clinical purposes in a population of adolescents. The present study’s results suggest that all subscale scores can be used reliably except for the Awareness subscale. If the Awareness subscale is used, we advise a cautious interpretation of its results.
情绪失调(ED)是指无法处理情绪体验并利用它们来实现自己的目标。简短版本的情绪调节困难量表(DERS-SF)是一种常用的ED测量方法,尚未在讲法语的青少年样本中得到验证。目的验证法语版的心理特征量表(F-DERS-SF),并评估其在青少年样本中的心理测量特性。方法139名14 ~ 18岁青少年(M = 16.58; SD = 0.80)完成了F-DERS-SF、正念和情绪困扰问卷。参与者的子样本(n = 33)在15天后第二次完成F-DERS-SF。评估因子结构、重测信度、内部一致性信度及收敛效度。为了进行比较,我们运行了两个可供选择的模型。结果原始版本的相关六因素模型模型拟合良好,除意识子量表外,其余子量表均具有良好的信度和效度。排除意识的备选五因素模型在被测模型中表现出最佳的模型拟合和心理测量特性。结论F-DERS-SF可用于青少年人群的研究和临床目的。本研究的结果表明,所有的子量表得分可以可靠地使用,除了意识子量表。如果使用意识子量表,我们建议对其结果进行谨慎的解释。
{"title":"A French Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (F-DERS-SF): Validation in an adolescent sample","authors":"Marbella Pérez-Peña,&nbsp;Pierre Philippot","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101119","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101119","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Emotion dysregulation (ED) is the inability to cope with emotional experiences and leverage them in line with one’s goals. The short version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation scale (DERS-SF) is a commonly used measure of ED that has not yet been validated in a francophone adolescent sample.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the present study is to validate a French version of the DERS-SF (F-DERS-SF) and assess its psychometric properties in a sample of adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>To achieve this, 139 adolescents aged 14 to 18 (<em>M</em> = 16.58; <em>SD</em> = 0.80) completed the F-DERS-SF, a mindfulness, and an emotional distress questionnaire. A sub-sample of participants (<em>n</em> = 33) completed the F-DERS-SF a second time after 15 days. Factor structure, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Two alternative models were run for comparison purposes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The correlated six-factor model of the original version displayed good model fit and excellent reliability and validity for all subscales except for the Awareness subscale. The alternative five-factor model excluding Awareness showed the best model fit and psychometric properties among the models tested.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The F-DERS-SF can be used for research and clinical purposes in a population of adolescents. The present study’s results suggest that all subscale scores can be used reliably except for the Awareness subscale. If the Awareness subscale is used, we advise a cautious interpretation of its results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145160053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mesurer l’acquisition de la pensée informatique : conception et validation de deux instruments 衡量计算机思维的习得:两个工具的设计和验证
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101116
K. Sigayret , A. Tricot , N. Blanc

Introduction

The learning of programming and the development of computational thinking are now part of the educational objectives in many school systems around the world. However, the lack of consensus on the definition of computational thinking complicates the assessment of its acquisition in a school context.

Objective

The aim of this article is to propose two assessment instruments for computational thinking adapted to the French-speaking school context, with a clear distinction between two fundamental dimensions: mastery of programming concepts and the ability to solve algorithmic problems.

Method

Two tests were designed: the Mastery of Computational Concepts Test, focusing on knowledge of programming concepts, and the Algorithmic Test, assessing the ability to solve algorithmic problems. These instruments were developed in French and validated using psychometric analyses.

Results

Both tests were found to have good psychometric properties, both in terms of reliability and validity.

Conclusion

These two instruments offer a relevant alternative to existing tools, which are often ill-suited to French-speaking contexts or too demanding in terms of test-taking time. They can contribute to a more refined assessment of computational thinking in the school context.
编程的学习和计算思维的发展现在是世界上许多学校系统的教育目标的一部分。然而,对计算思维的定义缺乏共识,使得在学校环境中评估其习得变得复杂。本文的目的是提出两种适合法语学校背景的计算思维评估工具,并明确区分两个基本维度:对编程概念的掌握和解决算法问题的能力。方法设计了两个测试:计算概念掌握测试,侧重于编程概念的知识;算法测试,评估解决算法问题的能力。这些工具是用法语开发的,并使用心理测量分析进行验证。结果两个测试在信度和效度上都具有良好的心理测量特性。这两种工具为现有的工具提供了一种相关的替代方案,这些工具通常不适合法语环境,或者在测试时间方面要求太高。它们有助于在学校环境中对计算思维进行更精确的评估。
{"title":"Mesurer l’acquisition de la pensée informatique : conception et validation de deux instruments","authors":"K. Sigayret ,&nbsp;A. Tricot ,&nbsp;N. Blanc","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101116","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101116","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The learning of programming and the development of computational thinking are now part of the educational objectives in many school systems around the world. However, the lack of consensus on the definition of computational thinking complicates the assessment of its acquisition in a school context.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this article is to propose two assessment instruments for computational thinking adapted to the French-speaking school context, with a clear distinction between two fundamental dimensions: mastery of programming concepts and the ability to solve algorithmic problems.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Two tests were designed: the Mastery of Computational Concepts Test, focusing on knowledge of programming concepts, and the Algorithmic Test, assessing the ability to solve algorithmic problems. These instruments were developed in French and validated using psychometric analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both tests were found to have good psychometric properties, both in terms of reliability and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These two instruments offer a relevant alternative to existing tools, which are often ill-suited to French-speaking contexts or too demanding in terms of test-taking time. They can contribute to a more refined assessment of computational thinking in the school context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145120331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mesurer l’acquisition de la pensée informatique : conception et validation de deux instruments 衡量计算机思维的习得:两个工具的设计和验证
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101116
K. Sigayret , A. Tricot , N. Blanc

Introduction

The learning of programming and the development of computational thinking are now part of the educational objectives in many school systems around the world. However, the lack of consensus on the definition of computational thinking complicates the assessment of its acquisition in a school context.

Objective

The aim of this article is to propose two assessment instruments for computational thinking adapted to the French-speaking school context, with a clear distinction between two fundamental dimensions: mastery of programming concepts and the ability to solve algorithmic problems.

Method

Two tests were designed: the Mastery of Computational Concepts Test, focusing on knowledge of programming concepts, and the Algorithmic Test, assessing the ability to solve algorithmic problems. These instruments were developed in French and validated using psychometric analyses.

Results

Both tests were found to have good psychometric properties, both in terms of reliability and validity.

Conclusion

These two instruments offer a relevant alternative to existing tools, which are often ill-suited to French-speaking contexts or too demanding in terms of test-taking time. They can contribute to a more refined assessment of computational thinking in the school context.
编程的学习和计算思维的发展现在是世界上许多学校系统的教育目标的一部分。然而,对计算思维的定义缺乏共识,使得在学校环境中评估其习得变得复杂。本文的目的是提出两种适合法语学校背景的计算思维评估工具,并明确区分两个基本维度:对编程概念的掌握和解决算法问题的能力。方法设计了两个测试:计算概念掌握测试,侧重于编程概念的知识;算法测试,评估解决算法问题的能力。这些工具是用法语开发的,并使用心理测量分析进行验证。结果两个测试在信度和效度上都具有良好的心理测量特性。这两种工具为现有的工具提供了一种相关的替代方案,这些工具通常不适合法语环境,或者在测试时间方面要求太高。它们有助于在学校环境中对计算思维进行更精确的评估。
{"title":"Mesurer l’acquisition de la pensée informatique : conception et validation de deux instruments","authors":"K. Sigayret ,&nbsp;A. Tricot ,&nbsp;N. Blanc","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101116","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101116","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The learning of programming and the development of computational thinking are now part of the educational objectives in many school systems around the world. However, the lack of consensus on the definition of computational thinking complicates the assessment of its acquisition in a school context.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this article is to propose two assessment instruments for computational thinking adapted to the French-speaking school context, with a clear distinction between two fundamental dimensions: mastery of programming concepts and the ability to solve algorithmic problems.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Two tests were designed: the Mastery of Computational Concepts Test, focusing on knowledge of programming concepts, and the Algorithmic Test, assessing the ability to solve algorithmic problems. These instruments were developed in French and validated using psychometric analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both tests were found to have good psychometric properties, both in terms of reliability and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These two instruments offer a relevant alternative to existing tools, which are often ill-suited to French-speaking contexts or too demanding in terms of test-taking time. They can contribute to a more refined assessment of computational thinking in the school context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 6","pages":"Article 101116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145120330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Burnout Assessment Tool among (inter)national students from a Dutch university 荷兰某大学留学生职业倦怠评估工具的有效性研究
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2025.101079
Piermarco Consiglio , Marjon Fokkens-Bruinsma , Ellen P.W.A. Jansen , Joke Fleer

Introduction

Burnout impacts academic performance and commitment of university students. It is therefore essential to have an up-to-date and psychometrically sound instrument for detecting burnout symptoms. Although a new valid and reliable instrument, namely the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), was developed for workers, it has not yet been established whether the BAT can be used in Dutch and English with Dutch and international university students, respectively.

Objective

This study aimed to validate the Dutch and English versions of the BAT for university students. Specifically, the psychometric properties, factorial structure, and measurement invariance of the tool across Dutch and international student populations were examined.

Method

The participants were 991 students from a Dutch university. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, while convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated by examining correlations with other measures. To assess the factorial validity of the BAT, Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) was employed. Moreover, measurement invariance was tested to ensure comparability of the tool across Dutch and international students.

Results

The BAT demonstrated high reliability and good convergent and discriminant validity. The MGCFA supported a second-order factorial model, while measurement invariance indicated that the instrument can be used comparably across Dutch and international students.

Conclusion

The findings of the current study suggest that the BAT is a reliable tool for assessing burnout symptoms among both Dutch and international students. The instrument can help in the early detection of burnout symptoms, ultimately contributing to improved student well-being and academic performance.
倦怠影响大学生的学习成绩和学业承诺。因此,必须有一种最新的、心理计量学上健全的仪器来检测倦怠症状。虽然开发了一种新的有效可靠的工具,即职业倦怠评估工具(BAT),但目前还没有确定BAT是否可以分别在荷兰语和英语中与荷兰和国际大学生一起使用。目的验证荷兰语版和英语版的大学生健康评估量表。具体地说,心理测量的性质,析因结构,测量工具在荷兰和国际学生群体的不变性进行了检查。方法以荷兰某大学991名学生为研究对象。信度采用Cronbach 's alpha进行评估,而收敛效度和判别效度则通过检查与其他措施的相关性来评估。为了评估BAT的因子效度,采用多组验证性因子分析(MGCFA)。此外,测量不变性进行了测试,以确保该工具在荷兰和国际学生之间的可比性。结果BAT具有较高的信度和较好的收敛效度和判别效度。MGCFA支持二阶阶乘模型,而测量不变性表明该工具可用于比较荷兰和国际学生。结论本研究结果表明,BAT是评估荷兰和国际学生职业倦怠症状的可靠工具。该仪器可以帮助早期发现倦怠症状,最终有助于提高学生的幸福感和学习成绩。
{"title":"Validation of the Burnout Assessment Tool among (inter)national students from a Dutch university","authors":"Piermarco Consiglio ,&nbsp;Marjon Fokkens-Bruinsma ,&nbsp;Ellen P.W.A. Jansen ,&nbsp;Joke Fleer","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101079","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erap.2025.101079","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Burnout impacts academic performance and commitment of university students. It is therefore essential to have an up-to-date and psychometrically sound instrument for detecting burnout symptoms. Although a new valid and reliable instrument, namely the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), was developed for workers, it has not yet been established whether the BAT can be used in Dutch and English with Dutch and international university students, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to validate the Dutch and English versions of the BAT for university students. Specifically, the psychometric properties, factorial structure, and measurement invariance of the tool across Dutch and international student populations were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The participants were 991 students from a Dutch university. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, while convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated by examining correlations with other measures. To assess the factorial validity of the BAT, Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) was employed. Moreover, measurement invariance was tested to ensure comparability of the tool across Dutch and international students.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The BAT demonstrated high reliability and good convergent and discriminant validity. The MGCFA supported a second-order factorial model, while measurement invariance indicated that the instrument can be used comparably across Dutch and international students.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of the current study suggest that the BAT is a reliable tool for assessing burnout symptoms among both Dutch and international students. The instrument can help in the early detection of burnout symptoms, ultimately contributing to improved student well-being and academic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"75 5","pages":"Article 101079"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145048881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1