A long and winding road: The hard graft of scaling social change in complex systems

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00455
John Healy , Jeffrey Hughes , Gemma Donnelly-Cox , Amanda Shantz
{"title":"A long and winding road: The hard graft of scaling social change in complex systems","authors":"John Healy ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Hughes ,&nbsp;Gemma Donnelly-Cox ,&nbsp;Amanda Shantz","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advice abounds on how to implement large-scale social change, much of which emphasizes a simplistic linear process, led by a heroic central actor. Rigorous case studies have shown that social change is far more complex: it is a reciprocal, iterative, and adaptive process, with multiple stakeholders who work backstage in networked, committed teams. Despite this, the myth of the social entrepreneur as a transformative change maker capable of scaling innovations to a societal level, still holds sway over social innovation support programmes and business school curricula. Using illustrative examples of successful efforts of large-scale social change across three of the most pressing international social challenges: access to medicines, the integration of migrant populations, and reorganizing social care models, we illustrate how conceptualizing social change as driven by iconic individuals is often counter-productive in terms of achieving impact at a societal level. Based on these analyses, we present five insights which illustrate how the mythology of social entrepreneurship and simplistic scaling concepts are often contrary to the practices employed within successful efforts to bring about social impact. Three counteracting principles for those leading, evaluating and funding innovative change efforts within complex systems are discussed and contrasted with the pervasive mythology of social entrepreneurship and linear scaling processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article e00455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673424000076/pdfft?md5=ae93e61b4aa11c3f2ad9938a90279adf&pid=1-s2.0-S2352673424000076-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673424000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advice abounds on how to implement large-scale social change, much of which emphasizes a simplistic linear process, led by a heroic central actor. Rigorous case studies have shown that social change is far more complex: it is a reciprocal, iterative, and adaptive process, with multiple stakeholders who work backstage in networked, committed teams. Despite this, the myth of the social entrepreneur as a transformative change maker capable of scaling innovations to a societal level, still holds sway over social innovation support programmes and business school curricula. Using illustrative examples of successful efforts of large-scale social change across three of the most pressing international social challenges: access to medicines, the integration of migrant populations, and reorganizing social care models, we illustrate how conceptualizing social change as driven by iconic individuals is often counter-productive in terms of achieving impact at a societal level. Based on these analyses, we present five insights which illustrate how the mythology of social entrepreneurship and simplistic scaling concepts are often contrary to the practices employed within successful efforts to bring about social impact. Three counteracting principles for those leading, evaluating and funding innovative change efforts within complex systems are discussed and contrasted with the pervasive mythology of social entrepreneurship and linear scaling processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
漫长而曲折的道路:在复杂系统中推进社会变革的艰辛历程
关于如何实施大规模社会变革的建议比比皆是,其中很多都强调由一个英雄式的核心行动者领导的简单化的线性过程。严谨的案例研究表明,社会变革要复杂得多:它是一个互惠、迭代和适应的过程,有多个利益相关者在后台组成网络化的坚定团队。尽管如此,关于社会企业家是能够将创新推广到社会层面的变革者的神话,仍然在社会创新支持计划和商学院课程中占据主导地位。我们利用在三个最紧迫的国际社会挑战中成功实现大规模社会变革的实例:药品获取、移民人口融入和社会关怀模式重组,说明将社会变革概念化为由标志性个人推动,往往会在实现社会层面的影响方面适得其反。在这些分析的基础上,我们提出了五点见解,说明社会企业家精神的神话和简单化的扩展概念如何与成功实现社会影响的实践背道而驰。我们讨论了在复杂系统中领导、评估和资助创新变革工作的三项反作用原则,并与普遍存在的社会创业神话和线性扩展过程进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Empirical entrepreneurial ecosystem research: A guide to creating multilevel datasets The myth of entrepreneurship as a tool: Reorienting business venturing as a goal in itself in a post-growth society Self-employment and inflammation in older adults: Examining biomarkers in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants How sector fluidity (knowledge-intensiveness and innovation) shapes startups’ resilience during crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1