Parental mental health and reporting of their child's behaviour: measurement invariance of the French version of the parental strengths and difficulties questionnaire.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1007/s00787-024-02392-z
Arnaud Sapin, Antoine Vanier, Arthur Descarpentry, Gustave Maffre Maviel, Cécile Vuillermoz, Bruno Falissard, Cédric Galera, Josiane Warszawski, Camille Davisse-Paturet, Jean-Baptiste Hazo, Alexandra Rouquette
{"title":"Parental mental health and reporting of their child's behaviour: measurement invariance of the French version of the parental strengths and difficulties questionnaire.","authors":"Arnaud Sapin, Antoine Vanier, Arthur Descarpentry, Gustave Maffre Maviel, Cécile Vuillermoz, Bruno Falissard, Cédric Galera, Josiane Warszawski, Camille Davisse-Paturet, Jean-Baptiste Hazo, Alexandra Rouquette","doi":"10.1007/s00787-024-02392-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Symptomatic effects of mental disorders in parents could bias their reporting on their child's mental health. This study aimed to investigate the measurement invariance of the French version of the parental Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) across parental mental health in a sample (N = 20,765) of parents of children aged 3 to 17 years in France. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (ESEM) were used to evaluate the fit of three known alternative SDQ factor structures (five, three, or second-order factor structures). Invariance was tested across parental mental health (present anxiety and depressive symptoms, psychiatric history) and across socio-demographic characteristics (child's age, child's gender, parent's gender, parent's educational level). CFA models showed a poor fit, while all ESEM models achieved acceptable or good fit, with the five-factor model presenting the best fit. Invariance was observed for all characteristics tested, indicating that the SDQ can be used to study the links between parental mental health and their child's mental health without bias. However, ESEM showed that the hyperactivity/inattention and conduct problems dimensions were not well differentiated in the French version of the SDQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":11856,"journal":{"name":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02392-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Symptomatic effects of mental disorders in parents could bias their reporting on their child's mental health. This study aimed to investigate the measurement invariance of the French version of the parental Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) across parental mental health in a sample (N = 20,765) of parents of children aged 3 to 17 years in France. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (ESEM) were used to evaluate the fit of three known alternative SDQ factor structures (five, three, or second-order factor structures). Invariance was tested across parental mental health (present anxiety and depressive symptoms, psychiatric history) and across socio-demographic characteristics (child's age, child's gender, parent's gender, parent's educational level). CFA models showed a poor fit, while all ESEM models achieved acceptable or good fit, with the five-factor model presenting the best fit. Invariance was observed for all characteristics tested, indicating that the SDQ can be used to study the links between parental mental health and their child's mental health without bias. However, ESEM showed that the hyperactivity/inattention and conduct problems dimensions were not well differentiated in the French version of the SDQ.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母的心理健康及其对子女行为的报告:父母优势与困难问卷法文版的测量不变性。
父母的精神障碍症状可能会影响他们对子女心理健康的报告。本研究以法国 3 至 17 岁儿童的父母为样本(样本数 = 20,765 人),旨在调查法文版父母优势与困难问卷(SDQ)在不同父母心理健康情况下的测量不变性。我们采用了确证因子分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)来评估三种已知的 SDQ 备选因子结构(五阶、三阶或二阶因子结构)的拟合度。对不同父母的心理健康状况(目前的焦虑和抑郁症状、精神病史)和不同社会人口特征(儿童年龄、儿童性别、父母性别、父母教育程度)进行了不变量测试。CFA 模型的拟合度较低,而所有 ESEM 模型的拟合度均可接受或良好,其中五因素模型的拟合度最高。所测试的所有特征均呈不变量,这表明 SDQ 可用于研究父母心理健康与其子女心理健康之间的联系,而不会产生偏差。然而,ESEM 显示,在法文版的 SDQ 中,多动/注意力不集中和行为问题两个维度没有得到很好的区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry is Europe''s only peer-reviewed journal entirely devoted to child and adolescent psychiatry. It aims to further a broad understanding of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Empirical research is its foundation, and clinical relevance is its hallmark. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry welcomes in particular papers covering neuropsychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, neuroimaging, pharmacology, and related fields of interest. Contributions are encouraged from all around the world.
期刊最新文献
Neurocognitive dysfunction in adolescents with recent onset major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional comparative study. Early psychopathology: a persistently misunderstood and overlooked issue? Mediation of DNA methylation (cg04622888 and cg05037505) in the association between childhood maltreatment and non-suicidal self-injury in early adolescents. Adult mental health outcomes of adolescent depression and co-occurring alcohol use disorder: a longitudinal cohort study. Associations between academic achievement and internalizing disorders in Swedish students aged 16 years between 1990 and 2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1