Generating, Grading, and Ghosting: How Organizing Experts Shapes Expertise

IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1111/joms.13056
Pedro Monteiro
{"title":"Generating, Grading, and Ghosting: How Organizing Experts Shapes Expertise","authors":"Pedro Monteiro","doi":"10.1111/joms.13056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experts increasingly refine their expertise into specialties as they labour in and around organizations. Yet, previous research assumes that experts are organized in the workplace in ways that passively accommodate or mirror pre‐existing specialties and focuses on organizational structures that codify the content of experts’ knowledge as an encroachment. Drawing on a qualitative field study in an aeronautical organization's engineering unit, this paper examines the organizational structures that chart the area of experts’ knowledge, i.e., their specialties. The findings show that organizational structures are generative, defining the contours of existing expertise and catalysing the formation of new ones (<jats:italic>generating</jats:italic>). However, organizational structures also encode criteria that implicitly rank some forms of expertise over others, thereby reinforcing status hierarchies (<jats:italic>grading</jats:italic>), and misalignment across organizational structures renders some forms of expertise invisible (<jats:italic>ghosting</jats:italic>). By showing the active role of organizational structures in shaping expertise rather than simply housing it, this paper contributes to our understanding of expertise development as well as status dynamics and access to resources among experts. Further, the paper reveals how misalignments across multiple organizational structures may impact the management of knowledge and human capital.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experts increasingly refine their expertise into specialties as they labour in and around organizations. Yet, previous research assumes that experts are organized in the workplace in ways that passively accommodate or mirror pre‐existing specialties and focuses on organizational structures that codify the content of experts’ knowledge as an encroachment. Drawing on a qualitative field study in an aeronautical organization's engineering unit, this paper examines the organizational structures that chart the area of experts’ knowledge, i.e., their specialties. The findings show that organizational structures are generative, defining the contours of existing expertise and catalysing the formation of new ones (generating). However, organizational structures also encode criteria that implicitly rank some forms of expertise over others, thereby reinforcing status hierarchies (grading), and misalignment across organizational structures renders some forms of expertise invisible (ghosting). By showing the active role of organizational structures in shaping expertise rather than simply housing it, this paper contributes to our understanding of expertise development as well as status dynamics and access to resources among experts. Further, the paper reveals how misalignments across multiple organizational structures may impact the management of knowledge and human capital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成、分级和幽灵:组织专家如何塑造专业知识
专家们在组织内外工作时,越来越多地将其专业知识细化为专业技能。然而,以往的研究认为,专家在工作场所的组织方式是被动地适应或反映已有的专长,并将重点放在将专家的知识内容编纂成法典的组织结构上,认为这是一种侵犯。本文通过对一家航空企业的工程部门进行实地定性研究,考察了规划专家知识领域(即专家专长)的组织结构。研究结果表明,组织结构具有生成性,它界定了现有专业知识的轮廓,并促进了新专业知识的形成(生成)。然而,组织结构也会编码一些标准,这些标准会将某些形式的专业知识隐含地排列在其他专业知识之上,从而强化了地位等级(分级),而组织结构之间的错位则会使某些形式的专业知识变得无影无踪(幽灵化)。通过展示组织结构在塑造专业知识方面的积极作用,而不仅仅是容纳专业知识,本文有助于我们理解专业知识的发展以及专家之间的地位动态和资源获取。此外,本文还揭示了多种组织结构之间的错位如何影响知识和人力资本的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1