Democracy as a floating signifier: The struggle for legitimation of programming in Swedish schools

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Policy Futures in Education Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1177/14782103241235725
Anthemis Raptopoulou, Brendan Munhall
{"title":"Democracy as a floating signifier: The struggle for legitimation of programming in Swedish schools","authors":"Anthemis Raptopoulou, Brendan Munhall","doi":"10.1177/14782103241235725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of democracy is a central component in education policy at all levels, yet its meaning can be interpreted in a number of ways. This paper examines how democracy is conceptualised and utilised as a legitimising force driving education policy reform. More specifically, attention is given to the use of democracy in the process of promoting programming’s inclusion in the Swedish compulsory curriculum. A number of mass-media articles published in Swedish are analysed using the concept of floating signifiers. The context of Sweden is of particular interest, since the notion of democracy has been a driving force in Swedish society for the legitimisation of education policy changes. In this paper, we chose to approach the link between democracy and education from a critical perspective and ask how the concept of democracy is being utilized as a part of political struggles to hegemonize and legitimize educational changes. It is argued that democracy, as a floating signifier, was central to the discursive production of the educational agenda of programming and its legitimisation. This article aims to function as a critique of the promotion of programming in education as a means to democracy.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241235725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of democracy is a central component in education policy at all levels, yet its meaning can be interpreted in a number of ways. This paper examines how democracy is conceptualised and utilised as a legitimising force driving education policy reform. More specifically, attention is given to the use of democracy in the process of promoting programming’s inclusion in the Swedish compulsory curriculum. A number of mass-media articles published in Swedish are analysed using the concept of floating signifiers. The context of Sweden is of particular interest, since the notion of democracy has been a driving force in Swedish society for the legitimisation of education policy changes. In this paper, we chose to approach the link between democracy and education from a critical perspective and ask how the concept of democracy is being utilized as a part of political struggles to hegemonize and legitimize educational changes. It is argued that democracy, as a floating signifier, was central to the discursive production of the educational agenda of programming and its legitimisation. This article aims to function as a critique of the promotion of programming in education as a means to democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为浮动符号的民主:瑞典学校为使编程合法化而进行的斗争
民主的概念是各级教育政策的核心内容,但其含义可以有多种解释。本文探讨了如何将民主概念化并将其用作推动教育政策改革的合法力量。更具体地说,本文关注的是在推动将编程纳入瑞典义务教育课程的过程中民主的运用。本研究使用浮动符号的概念分析了大量以瑞典语发表的大众媒体文章。瑞典的情况尤其值得关注,因为民主的概念在瑞典社会中一直是教育政策变革合法化的推动力。在本文中,我们选择从批判的角度来探讨民主与教育之间的联系,并询问民主概念是如何被用作政治斗争的一部分,以实现教育变革的霸权化和合法化的。本文认为,民主作为一种浮动的符号,是编制教育议程的话语生产及其合法化的核心。本文旨在批判将教育编程作为实现民主的手段的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
An analysis of Australian teacher workforce policy: Challenges and opportunities for teacher recruitment and retention Guest editorial: Considering the global-local relationships in education Perpetual emergency education: Urban refugee education in Thailand is disrupted during the COVID-19 Governance dynamics and local autonomy in large-scale governmental funding: The case of Sweden’s campaign to improve equity Tracing neoliberal discourse in school documentation. The analysis of educational projects in Barcelona state schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1