A simple test of misspecification for linear asset pricing models

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s11408-024-00445-6
Antoine Giannetti
{"title":"A simple test of misspecification for linear asset pricing models","authors":"Antoine Giannetti","doi":"10.1007/s11408-024-00445-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A fundamental implication of asset pricing theory is that investors must earn risk-premiums for bearing exposure to systematic risk. The two-pass cross-sectional regression is a popular approach for risk-premium estimation. The empirical literature has found that this approach often delivers estimates that significantly differ from their time-series counterparts. The paper explores a test of model misspecification that exploits the difference between cross-sectional and time-series risk-premium estimates. The suggested approach complements traditional misspecification tests and may be applied as an alternative to the deployment of misspecification-robust standard errors to test risk-premium significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":44895,"journal":{"name":"Financial Markets and Portfolio Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Markets and Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-024-00445-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental implication of asset pricing theory is that investors must earn risk-premiums for bearing exposure to systematic risk. The two-pass cross-sectional regression is a popular approach for risk-premium estimation. The empirical literature has found that this approach often delivers estimates that significantly differ from their time-series counterparts. The paper explores a test of model misspecification that exploits the difference between cross-sectional and time-series risk-premium estimates. The suggested approach complements traditional misspecification tests and may be applied as an alternative to the deployment of misspecification-robust standard errors to test risk-premium significance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
线性资产定价模型的简单错误检验
资产定价理论的一个基本含义是,投资者必须通过承担系统性风险来赚取风险溢价。两段式横截面回归是一种常用的风险溢价估算方法。实证文献发现,这种方法得出的估算结果往往与时间序列估算结果存在显著差异。本文利用横截面和时间序列风险溢价估算值之间的差异,探讨了一种检验模型失当的方法。所建议的方法补充了传统的失范检验方法,并可作为一种替代方法,用于检验风险溢价的显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The journal Financial Markets and Portfolio Management invites submissions of original research articles in all areas of finance, especially in – but not limited to – financial markets, portfolio choice and wealth management, asset pricing, risk management, and regulation. Its principal objective is to publish high-quality articles of innovative research and practical application. The readers of Financial Markets and Portfolio Management are academics and professionals in finance and economics, especially in the areas of asset management. FMPM publishes academic and applied research articles, shorter ''Perspectives'' and survey articles on current topics of interest to the financial community, as well as book reviews. All article submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review. http://www.fmpm.org Officially cited as: Financ Mark Portf Manag
期刊最新文献
Can machine learning make technical analysis work? Politically connected outside directors and market reaction: evidence from Korea Herding the crowds: how sentiment affects crowdsourced earnings estimates Report of the editor 2023 A simple test of misspecification for linear asset pricing models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1