Looking back to move forward: Creating a blueprint for success for nurse scientists in the Veterans Health Administration

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Applied Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151764
Ashley C. Mog , Cathy M. St. Pierre , Helene J. Moriarty , Sheila Cox Sullivan , Catherine Battaglia
{"title":"Looking back to move forward: Creating a blueprint for success for nurse scientists in the Veterans Health Administration","authors":"Ashley C. Mog ,&nbsp;Cathy M. St. Pierre ,&nbsp;Helene J. Moriarty ,&nbsp;Sheila Cox Sullivan ,&nbsp;Catherine Battaglia","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The purpose of this manuscript is to report the findings of a qualitative content analysis of interviews with VA Nurse Scientists about work life experiences, barriers, and facilitators across the enterprise.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>The VA enterprise is widely variable in terms of size, services, research activity, and budget. For this reason, the roles of nurses with a research-focused doctorate are also quite diverse.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We purposively sampled 18 PhD prepared Nurse Scientists based on a variety geographic locations, titles, and years in the field and who conduct research. We conducted semi-structured interviews over the virtual platform, WebEx. Interviews, averaging 1 h in length, were conducted between April and May 2021. We analyzed interviews using deductive and inductive content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found five key factors affecting VA Nurse Scientists. Each factor emerged as an important issue influencing whether Nurse Scientists reported being successful, supported, and productive in their research. These include having: 1) mentorship, 2) supportive leadership 3) available resources, 4) respect and understanding from clinical and research colleagues who understand a Nurse Scientist's role in research, and 5) a career pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>VA Nurse Scientists are leaders and innovators who generate evidence to improve health outcomes and promote equity in health and health care of Veterans, their families, and caregivers. Results from this project suggest that many Nurse Scientists need additional mentorship, resources, and networks to advance their development, increase their funding success, and maximize the impact of their role, ultimately enhancing care of Veterans and their families.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 151764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189724000028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this manuscript is to report the findings of a qualitative content analysis of interviews with VA Nurse Scientists about work life experiences, barriers, and facilitators across the enterprise.

Background

The VA enterprise is widely variable in terms of size, services, research activity, and budget. For this reason, the roles of nurses with a research-focused doctorate are also quite diverse.

Methods

We purposively sampled 18 PhD prepared Nurse Scientists based on a variety geographic locations, titles, and years in the field and who conduct research. We conducted semi-structured interviews over the virtual platform, WebEx. Interviews, averaging 1 h in length, were conducted between April and May 2021. We analyzed interviews using deductive and inductive content analysis.

Results

We found five key factors affecting VA Nurse Scientists. Each factor emerged as an important issue influencing whether Nurse Scientists reported being successful, supported, and productive in their research. These include having: 1) mentorship, 2) supportive leadership 3) available resources, 4) respect and understanding from clinical and research colleagues who understand a Nurse Scientist's role in research, and 5) a career pathway.

Conclusions

VA Nurse Scientists are leaders and innovators who generate evidence to improve health outcomes and promote equity in health and health care of Veterans, their families, and caregivers. Results from this project suggest that many Nurse Scientists need additional mentorship, resources, and networks to advance their development, increase their funding success, and maximize the impact of their role, ultimately enhancing care of Veterans and their families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾过去,展望未来:为退伍军人健康管理局的护士科学家绘制成功蓝图
背景退伍军人事务部的企业在规模、服务、研究活动和预算方面千差万别。因此,拥有以研究为重点的博士学位的护士的角色也是多种多样的。方法我们根据不同的地理位置、职称和从业年限,有目的地抽取了 18 名准备攻读博士学位并从事研究工作的护士科学家。我们通过 WebEx 虚拟平台进行了半结构化访谈。访谈在 2021 年 4 月至 5 月期间进行,平均时长为 1 小时。我们使用演绎和归纳内容分析法对访谈进行了分析。结果我们发现了影响退伍军人事务部护士科学家的五个关键因素。每个因素都是影响科学家护士是否在研究中取得成功、得到支持和富有成效的重要问题。这些因素包括结论 退伍军人事务部护士科学家是领导者和创新者,他们创造证据来改善退伍军人、其家人和护理人员的健康状况并促进其健康和医疗保健的公平性。本项目的结果表明,许多护士科学家需要更多的指导、资源和网络来促进他们的发展,提高他们的筹资成功率,并最大限度地发挥他们的作用,最终加强对退伍军人及其家人的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Implementing MATRIX acuity tool to improve nursing satisfaction on a stroke and epilepsy monitoring unit Artificial intelligence in nursing practice – A Delphi study with ChatGPT Mental health misconceptions among at-risk populations: The case of hotel workers What are the attitudes and perceptions of general practitioners about the role of nurse practitioners in the community care setting: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1