Sociological Animal Studies Courses Are More Effective Than Human-Centered Sociology Courses in Enhancing Empathy

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Sociology Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1177/0092055x231224120
Cameron T. Whitley, Erin N. Kidder, Kelley J. Ortiz, Liz Grauerholz
{"title":"Sociological Animal Studies Courses Are More Effective Than Human-Centered Sociology Courses in Enhancing Empathy","authors":"Cameron T. Whitley, Erin N. Kidder, Kelley J. Ortiz, Liz Grauerholz","doi":"10.1177/0092055x231224120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociology plays a key role in empathy development, which is central to addressing complex social problems. However, little is known about what types of courses work best to enhance empathy. In parallel, sociological animal studies (SAS) has evolved as a relatively new subfield focused on assessing human and animal relationships. SAS research suggests that our interactions with animals enhance empathy development. Combining these literatures, we assess if SAS compared to non-SAS courses impact affective and cognitive empathy for humans and animals differently. Findings reveal that students who take SAS courses demonstrate greater postcourse human and animal empathy even when controlling for precourse levels of empathy and other factors that drive empathy development. Although SAS remains on the periphery of the discipline, this study suggests that it should be a central component of the sociological curriculum.","PeriodicalId":46942,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x231224120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sociology plays a key role in empathy development, which is central to addressing complex social problems. However, little is known about what types of courses work best to enhance empathy. In parallel, sociological animal studies (SAS) has evolved as a relatively new subfield focused on assessing human and animal relationships. SAS research suggests that our interactions with animals enhance empathy development. Combining these literatures, we assess if SAS compared to non-SAS courses impact affective and cognitive empathy for humans and animals differently. Findings reveal that students who take SAS courses demonstrate greater postcourse human and animal empathy even when controlling for precourse levels of empathy and other factors that drive empathy development. Although SAS remains on the periphery of the discipline, this study suggests that it should be a central component of the sociological curriculum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与以人为本的社会学课程相比,动物社会学课程在增强同理心方面更为有效
社会学在移情能力培养方面发挥着关键作用,而移情能力培养是解决复杂社会问题的核心。然而,人们对哪类课程最能增进同理心却知之甚少。与此同时,社会学动物研究(SAS)作为一个相对较新的子领域,专注于评估人类与动物的关系。动物社会学研究表明,我们与动物的互动能促进移情能力的发展。结合这些文献,我们评估了与非 SAS 课程相比,SAS 课程是否会对人类和动物的情感和认知移情产生不同的影响。研究结果表明,即使控制了课程前的移情水平和其他驱动移情发展的因素,选修 SAS 课程的学生在课程后仍能表现出更高的人类和动物移情能力。虽然 SAS 仍处于学科的边缘,但这项研究表明,它应该成为社会学课程的核心组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Sociology
Teaching Sociology Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
31.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Teaching Sociology (TS) publishes articles, notes, and reviews intended to be helpful to the discipline"s teachers. Articles range from experimental studies of teaching and learning to broad, synthetic essays on pedagogically important issues. Notes focus on specific teaching issues or techniques. The general intent is to share theoretically stimulating and practically useful information and advice with teachers. Formats include full-length articles; notes of 10 pages or less; interviews, review essays; reviews of books, films, videos, and software; and conversations.
期刊最新文献
Whom Benefits? Building a Critical Service-Learning Model Taking Ethnography to Court: Pedagogical Reflections on a Collective Field Study “Out of the Comfort Zone”: Creating a Safely Brave Space for Dialogues about Race New Resources in TRAILS: The Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology Black Lives Matter and the Changing Sociological Canon: An Analysis of Syllabi from 2012 to 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1