Using the visual cliff and pole descent assays to detect binocular disruption in mice.

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Sociology Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1101/2023.05.29.542767
Héctor De Jesús-Cortés, Teresa L M Cramer, Daniel A Bowen, Francis Reilly-Andújar, Sophie Lu, Eric D Gaier, Mark F Bear
{"title":"Using the visual cliff and pole descent assays to detect binocular disruption in mice.","authors":"Héctor De Jesús-Cortés, Teresa L M Cramer, Daniel A Bowen, Francis Reilly-Andújar, Sophie Lu, Eric D Gaier, Mark F Bear","doi":"10.1101/2023.05.29.542767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amblyopia, a neurodevelopmental visual disorder characterized by impaired stereoacuity, is commonly modeled in animals using monocular deprivation (MD) during a critical period of visual development. Despite extensive research at the synaptic, cellular and circuit levels of analysis, reliable behavioral assays to study stereoscopic deficits in mice are limited. This study aimed to characterize the Visual Cliff Assay (VCA) and the Pole Descent Cliff Task (PDCT) in mice, and to evaluate their utility in detecting binocular dysfunction. Using these assays, we investigated the impact of clinically relevant manipulations of binocular vision, including monocular occlusion, pupillary dilation, and amblyopia induced by long-term MD. Our findings reveal that optimal performance in both the VCA and PDCT are dependent on balanced binocular input. However, deficits after MD in the VCA exhibited relatively small effect sizes (7-14%), requiring large sample sizes for statistical comparisons. In contrast, the PDCT demonstrated larger effect sizes (43-61%), allowing for reliable detection of binocular dysfunction with a smaller sample size. Both assays were validated using multiple monocular manipulations relevant to clinical paradigms, with the PDCT emerging as the preferred assay for detecting deficits in stereoscopic depth perception in mice. These findings provide a robust framework for using the VCA and PDCT in mechanistic and therapeutic studies in mice, offering insights into the neural mechanisms of binocular vision and potential interventions for amblyopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46942,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Sociology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amblyopia, a neurodevelopmental visual disorder characterized by impaired stereoacuity, is commonly modeled in animals using monocular deprivation (MD) during a critical period of visual development. Despite extensive research at the synaptic, cellular and circuit levels of analysis, reliable behavioral assays to study stereoscopic deficits in mice are limited. This study aimed to characterize the Visual Cliff Assay (VCA) and the Pole Descent Cliff Task (PDCT) in mice, and to evaluate their utility in detecting binocular dysfunction. Using these assays, we investigated the impact of clinically relevant manipulations of binocular vision, including monocular occlusion, pupillary dilation, and amblyopia induced by long-term MD. Our findings reveal that optimal performance in both the VCA and PDCT are dependent on balanced binocular input. However, deficits after MD in the VCA exhibited relatively small effect sizes (7-14%), requiring large sample sizes for statistical comparisons. In contrast, the PDCT demonstrated larger effect sizes (43-61%), allowing for reliable detection of binocular dysfunction with a smaller sample size. Both assays were validated using multiple monocular manipulations relevant to clinical paradigms, with the PDCT emerging as the preferred assay for detecting deficits in stereoscopic depth perception in mice. These findings provide a robust framework for using the VCA and PDCT in mechanistic and therapeutic studies in mice, offering insights into the neural mechanisms of binocular vision and potential interventions for amblyopia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用视觉悬崖和极点下降试验检测小鼠双目失明。
弱视是一种神经发育性视觉障碍,其特点是立体视敏锐度受损,通常在动物视觉发育的关键时期使用单眼剥夺(MD)来模拟弱视。尽管在突触、细胞和电路分析层面进行了广泛的研究,但用于研究小鼠立体视缺陷的可靠行为测定方法却很有限。本研究旨在描述小鼠视觉峭壁试验(VCA)和极点下降峭壁任务(PDCT)的特征,并评估它们在检测双眼功能障碍方面的实用性。利用这些试验,我们研究了与临床相关的双目视觉操作的影响,包括单目遮盖、瞳孔扩张和长期MD诱导的弱视。我们的研究结果表明,VCA 和 PDCT 的最佳表现都依赖于平衡的双眼输入。然而,MD后VCA的缺陷表现出相对较小的效应大小(7-14%),需要较大的样本量才能进行统计比较。与此相反,PDCT 显示出更大的效应量(43-61%),从而可以用较小的样本量可靠地检测出双眼功能障碍。使用与临床范例相关的多种单眼操作对这两种检测方法进行了验证,PDCT 成为检测小鼠立体深度知觉缺陷的首选检测方法。这些发现为在小鼠机理和治疗研究中使用 VCA 和 PDCT 提供了一个强大的框架,有助于深入了解双眼视觉的神经机制和弱视的潜在干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Sociology
Teaching Sociology Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
31.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Teaching Sociology (TS) publishes articles, notes, and reviews intended to be helpful to the discipline"s teachers. Articles range from experimental studies of teaching and learning to broad, synthetic essays on pedagogically important issues. Notes focus on specific teaching issues or techniques. The general intent is to share theoretically stimulating and practically useful information and advice with teachers. Formats include full-length articles; notes of 10 pages or less; interviews, review essays; reviews of books, films, videos, and software; and conversations.
期刊最新文献
Using the visual cliff and pole descent assays to detect binocular disruption in mice. Book Review: Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions Film Review: Hot Coffee: Is Justice Being Served? Book Review: Academic Outsider: Stories of Exclusion and Hope Film Review: Aftershock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1