Effect of veterinary antibiotics on methane yield from livestock manure anaerobic digestion: an analytical review of the evidence

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s11157-024-09683-6
Noori M. Cata Saady, Subramaniyasharma Sivaraman, Ponnusami Venkatachalam, Sohrab Zendehboudi, Yan Zhang, Rosimary Yañez Palma, Saravanan Ramiah Shanmugam, Juan E. Ruiz Espinoza
{"title":"Effect of veterinary antibiotics on methane yield from livestock manure anaerobic digestion: an analytical review of the evidence","authors":"Noori M. Cata Saady,&nbsp;Subramaniyasharma Sivaraman,&nbsp;Ponnusami Venkatachalam,&nbsp;Sohrab Zendehboudi,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Rosimary Yañez Palma,&nbsp;Saravanan Ramiah Shanmugam,&nbsp;Juan E. Ruiz Espinoza","doi":"10.1007/s11157-024-09683-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Antibiotics are administered to livestock animals as medications and, in some jurisdictions, as growth promotors. This review examines the impact of veterinary antibiotics on methane production from manure anaerobic digestion (AD). The animals excrete about 17–90% of the administered antibiotics in manure unchanged or as metabolites, which adversely affect microorganisms catalyzing the manure AD, thereby reducing methane yields. Different antibiotics influence methane production to different extents (0–80%). The results from studies on manure artificially spiked with antibiotics differ from those on manure from antibiotic-fed animals, likely due to the effect of other bioactive substances in the manure. Over time, the microbial culture might adapt to the antibiotics, altering its composition, and further affecting the methane yield. Such adaptation indicates that short-term studies might not fully capture the antibiotic’s long-term effects on AD. Effects of oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline on methane production are debatable, with chlortetracycline generally believed to have a slightly stronger inhibition. Correlation, nonlinear modeling/simulation, and principal component analysis (PCA) reveal that the antibiotic effects on methane yield are complex and depend on various parameters such as antibiotic type, concentration, application mode, duration, specific microbial communities, and digester conditions. The PCA showed that the temperature and concentration rather than the manure origin (pigs vs cows) dictate the magnitude of methane production inhibition. Data on the kinetics of antibiotics’ impact, isomerization, and effects of operation strategies are missing. This review summarizes the main knowledge gaps concerning AD of antibiotics-containing manure and suggestions for operational strategies and future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":754,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","volume":"23 1","pages":"133 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-024-09683-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotics are administered to livestock animals as medications and, in some jurisdictions, as growth promotors. This review examines the impact of veterinary antibiotics on methane production from manure anaerobic digestion (AD). The animals excrete about 17–90% of the administered antibiotics in manure unchanged or as metabolites, which adversely affect microorganisms catalyzing the manure AD, thereby reducing methane yields. Different antibiotics influence methane production to different extents (0–80%). The results from studies on manure artificially spiked with antibiotics differ from those on manure from antibiotic-fed animals, likely due to the effect of other bioactive substances in the manure. Over time, the microbial culture might adapt to the antibiotics, altering its composition, and further affecting the methane yield. Such adaptation indicates that short-term studies might not fully capture the antibiotic’s long-term effects on AD. Effects of oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline on methane production are debatable, with chlortetracycline generally believed to have a slightly stronger inhibition. Correlation, nonlinear modeling/simulation, and principal component analysis (PCA) reveal that the antibiotic effects on methane yield are complex and depend on various parameters such as antibiotic type, concentration, application mode, duration, specific microbial communities, and digester conditions. The PCA showed that the temperature and concentration rather than the manure origin (pigs vs cows) dictate the magnitude of methane production inhibition. Data on the kinetics of antibiotics’ impact, isomerization, and effects of operation strategies are missing. This review summarizes the main knowledge gaps concerning AD of antibiotics-containing manure and suggestions for operational strategies and future research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
兽用抗生素对牲畜粪便厌氧消化产生的甲烷产量的影响:证据分析综述
抗生素是作为药物施用给家畜的,在某些地区还被用作生长促进剂。本综述探讨了兽用抗生素对粪便厌氧消化(AD)产生的甲烷的影响。动物在粪便中排出的抗生素中约有 17-90% 没有改变或以代谢物的形式排出,这对催化粪便厌氧消化的微生物产生了不利影响,从而降低了甲烷产量。不同抗生素对甲烷产量的影响程度不同(0-80%)。对人工添加抗生素的粪便的研究结果与对饲喂抗生素的动物粪便的研究结果不同,这可能是由于粪便中其他生物活性物质的影响。随着时间的推移,微生物培养可能会适应抗生素,改变其组成,进一步影响甲烷产量。这种适应性表明,短期研究可能无法完全反映抗生素对厌氧消化的长期影响。土霉素和金霉素对甲烷产量的影响尚有争议,一般认为金霉素的抑制作用稍强。相关性、非线性建模/模拟和主成分分析(PCA)显示,抗生素对甲烷产量的影响是复杂的,取决于各种参数,如抗生素类型、浓度、应用模式、持续时间、特定微生物群落和消化器条件。PCA 显示,温度和浓度而非粪便来源(猪与牛)决定了甲烷产量抑制的程度。有关抗生素影响、异构化和操作策略影响的动力学数据尚缺。本综述总结了有关含抗生素粪便厌氧消化(AD)的主要知识空白,并对操作策略和未来研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology is a publication that offers easily comprehensible, reliable, and well-rounded perspectives and evaluations in the realm of environmental science and (bio)technology. It disseminates the most recent progressions and timely compilations of groundbreaking scientific discoveries, technological advancements, practical applications, policy developments, and societal concerns encompassing all facets of environmental science and (bio)technology. Furthermore, it tackles broader aspects beyond the natural sciences, incorporating subjects such as education, funding, policy-making, intellectual property, and societal influence.
期刊最新文献
The potential of biochar incorporation into agricultural soils to promote sustainable agriculture: insights from soil health, crop productivity, greenhouse gas emission mitigation and feasibility perspectives—a critical review Chemical interactions under the bark: bark-, ambrosia-, and wood-boring beetles and their microbial associates Biochar: a potential and green adsorbent for antibiotics removal from aqueous solution Unveiling the evolution of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, fouling issues, and future perspective in wastewater treatment Correction to: Harnessing green tide Ulva biomass for carbon dioxide sequestration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1