The effect of perceived HRM system strength on employees’ counterproductive work behavior

IF 2.2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Asian Business & Management Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1057/s41291-023-00257-y
Yuxin Jiao, Jianfeng Jia, Cihan Fan
{"title":"The effect of perceived HRM system strength on employees’ counterproductive work behavior","authors":"Yuxin Jiao, Jianfeng Jia, Cihan Fan","doi":"10.1057/s41291-023-00257-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined the effect of perceived human resource management (HRM) system strength on employees’ counterproductive work behavior based on uncertainty management theory. The mediating role of perceptions of organizational politics and the moderating role of collectivism were also tested. We conducted three-wave surveys of 216 employees and used regression analysis to test the hypotheses. The results show that perceived HRM system strength negatively influences employees’ counterproductive work behavior. Perceptions of organizational politics mediate the relationship between perceived HRM system strength and employees’ counterproductive work behavior. Collectivism moderates the positive relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employees’ counterproductive work behavior, such that the relationship will be stronger when collectivism is higher. The study enriches the research on the antecedents of counterproductive work behavior from the perspective of the HRM implementation process. It also provides suggestions for companies to reduce the counterproductive work behavior of employees.</p>","PeriodicalId":46512,"journal":{"name":"Asian Business & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Business & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00257-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effect of perceived human resource management (HRM) system strength on employees’ counterproductive work behavior based on uncertainty management theory. The mediating role of perceptions of organizational politics and the moderating role of collectivism were also tested. We conducted three-wave surveys of 216 employees and used regression analysis to test the hypotheses. The results show that perceived HRM system strength negatively influences employees’ counterproductive work behavior. Perceptions of organizational politics mediate the relationship between perceived HRM system strength and employees’ counterproductive work behavior. Collectivism moderates the positive relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employees’ counterproductive work behavior, such that the relationship will be stronger when collectivism is higher. The study enriches the research on the antecedents of counterproductive work behavior from the perspective of the HRM implementation process. It also provides suggestions for companies to reduce the counterproductive work behavior of employees.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知到的人力资源管理系统强度对员工反工作行为的影响
本研究以不确定性管理理论为基础,探讨了感知到的人力资源管理(HRM)系统强度对员工反工作行为的影响。研究还检验了组织政治感知的中介作用和集体主义的调节作用。我们对 216 名员工进行了三波调查,并使用回归分析对假设进行了检验。结果表明,感知到的人力资源管理系统强度对员工的反生产性工作行为有负面影响。对组织政治的感知是感知到的人力资源管理系统强度与员工反工作行为之间关系的中介。集体主义调节了组织政治感知与员工反生产性工作行为之间的正相关关系,即当集体主义程度较高时,两者之间的关系会更密切。本研究从人力资源管理实施过程的角度丰富了对员工反生产性工作行为前因的研究。它还为企业减少员工的反生产性工作行为提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Asian Business & Management (ABM) is an academic management and business journal with a focus on Asia. The journal covers topics in the areas of corporate governance, human resource management, marketing, organizational behavior, organization theory, strategy, technology management, and related areas. ABM distinguishes itself from general business and management journals as it focuses on the Asian context. The focus on Asia is an important and appealing feature of ABM. ABM is open to different methodological approaches, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and conceptual work, contributing to an enhanced understanding of Asian business and management. Please refer to the 2018 Editorial for further details: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41291-017-0028-0  A rigorous double-blind peer review system, involving in-country and international refereeing, ensures that articles meet the highest quality standards.
期刊最新文献
Rural women entrepreneurship: when femininity compensates for institutional hurdles Digital transformation and digital dynamic capabilities improvement in low-medium technology sector: evidence from Thai family firms Political tie diversity and inclusion at work in Asia: a critical view and a roadmap High-performance work systems and firm performance: the mediation effect of the quality of employee turnover Sustainability from institutionalism: determinants of Korean companies’ ESG performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1