High-performance work systems and firm performance: the mediation effect of the quality of employee turnover

IF 2.2 4区管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Asian Business & Management Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1057/s41291-024-00270-9

Kiwook Kwon, Chiho Ok, Kwanghyun Kim

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate: (a) the differences in how human resource (HR) practice bundles, which enhance skills, motivation, and opportunities, account for the turnover of high performers versus non-high performers; (b) whether the turnover of high performers has a stronger impact on firm performance compared to that of non-high performers; and (c) whether the turnover of high performers, rather than that of non-high performers, mediates the relationship between HR practices and firm performance. Research hypotheses were tested using data collected from 153 South Korean companies. The results indicated that (a) HR practice bundles enhancing motivation were most effective in retaining high performers, compared to those enhancing skills or opportunities; (b) the turnover of high performers had a substantially stronger impact on firm financial performance compared to that of non-high performers; and (c) the turnover of high performers mediated the impact of motivation-enhancing HR practices on firm financial performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

高绩效工作体系与企业绩效：员工流动质量的中介效应

本研究旨在探讨：(a) 人力资源（HR）实践捆绑（提高技能、激励和机会）如何导致高绩效者与非高绩效者离职的差异；(b) 高绩效者离职与非高绩效者离职相比是否对企业绩效有更大的影响；(c) 高绩效者离职而非非高绩效者离职是否调解了人力资源实践与企业绩效之间的关系。研究假设利用从 153 家韩国公司收集的数据进行了检验。结果表明：(a) 与提高技能或增加机会的人力资源做法相比，提高积极性的人力资源做法捆绑在留住高绩效人员方面最为有效；(b) 与非高绩效人员相比，高绩效人员的流动对公司财务业绩的影响要大得多；(c) 高绩效人员的流动是提高积极性的人力资源做法对公司财务业绩影响的中介。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Asian Business & Management Multiple-

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Asian Business & Management (ABM) is an academic management and business journal with a focus on Asia. The journal covers topics in the areas of corporate governance, human resource management, marketing, organizational behavior, organization theory, strategy, technology management, and related areas. ABM distinguishes itself from general business and management journals as it focuses on the Asian context. The focus on Asia is an important and appealing feature of ABM. ABM is open to different methodological approaches, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and conceptual work, contributing to an enhanced understanding of Asian business and management. Please refer to the 2018 Editorial for further details: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41291-017-0028-0 A rigorous double-blind peer review system, involving in-country and international refereeing, ensures that articles meet the highest quality standards.