Financial Freedom Perception Scale (FFPS): Construction and validation

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100902
Kelmara Mendes Vieira , Taiane Keila Matheis , Ani Caroline Grigion Potrich , Mayara de Carvalho Puhle , Aureliano Angel Bressan , Leander Luiz Klein
{"title":"Financial Freedom Perception Scale (FFPS): Construction and validation","authors":"Kelmara Mendes Vieira ,&nbsp;Taiane Keila Matheis ,&nbsp;Ani Caroline Grigion Potrich ,&nbsp;Mayara de Carvalho Puhle ,&nbsp;Aureliano Angel Bressan ,&nbsp;Leander Luiz Klein","doi":"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main motivation of this study is the absence of consolidated measures to evaluate individuals' perceptions of financial freedom. So<strong>,</strong> this study has the objective of constructing and validating a Financial Freedom Perception Scale (FFPS). Furthermore, it seeks to provide the first evidence for differences in the perception of financial freedom according to gender, age, race and formal education. The research was developed by two main phases. The qualitative phase consisted of interviews, expert validation, and pre-test used to define the scale and the construction of the items. In the quantitative phase, two samples were collected: one with 1020 cases for exploratory analysis and another of 2293 respondents for confirmatory validation. The tests validated the FFPS as a one-dimensional scale consisting of nine items assessing the individual's financial freedom perception. We also present an application methodology for FFPS. We identified that a significant portion of the population perceives itself as financially free, but this perception is quite distinct among citizens of different profiles. The FFPS can be useful for academics, researchers, public managers, and financial agents. It can also indicate the results of public policies on financial inclusion, income transfer, and financial literacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main motivation of this study is the absence of consolidated measures to evaluate individuals' perceptions of financial freedom. So, this study has the objective of constructing and validating a Financial Freedom Perception Scale (FFPS). Furthermore, it seeks to provide the first evidence for differences in the perception of financial freedom according to gender, age, race and formal education. The research was developed by two main phases. The qualitative phase consisted of interviews, expert validation, and pre-test used to define the scale and the construction of the items. In the quantitative phase, two samples were collected: one with 1020 cases for exploratory analysis and another of 2293 respondents for confirmatory validation. The tests validated the FFPS as a one-dimensional scale consisting of nine items assessing the individual's financial freedom perception. We also present an application methodology for FFPS. We identified that a significant portion of the population perceives itself as financially free, but this perception is quite distinct among citizens of different profiles. The FFPS can be useful for academics, researchers, public managers, and financial agents. It can also indicate the results of public policies on financial inclusion, income transfer, and financial literacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财务自由感知量表(FFPS):构建与验证
本研究的主要动机是缺乏评估个人财务自由感知的综合措施。因此,本研究旨在构建并验证财务自由感知量表(FFPS)。此外,本研究还试图首次证明不同性别、年龄、种族和正规教育程度的人对财务自由的认知存在差异。研究主要分为两个阶段。定性阶段包括访谈、专家论证和用于定义量表和构建项目的预测试。在定量阶段,收集了两个样本:一个是用于探索性分析的 1020 个案例,另一个是用于确认性验证的 2293 个受访者。测试验证了 FFPS 是一个由九个项目组成的一维量表,用于评估个人的财务自由感知。我们还介绍了 FFPS 的应用方法。我们发现,有相当一部分人认为自己财务自由,但不同特征的公民对财务自由的认知存在很大差异。FFPS 对学者、研究人员、公共管理者和金融代理人都很有用。它还可以显示有关金融包容性、收入转移和金融知识普及的公共政策的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Experimental Finance represent lenses and approaches through which we can view financial decision-making. The aim of the journal is to publish high quality research in all fields of finance, where such research is carried out with a behavioral perspective and / or is carried out via experimental methods. It is open to but not limited to papers which cover investigations of biases, the role of various neurological markers in financial decision making, national and organizational culture as it impacts financial decision making, sentiment and asset pricing, the design and implementation of experiments to investigate financial decision making and trading, methodological experiments, and natural experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance welcomes full-length and short letter papers in the area of behavioral finance and experimental finance. The focus is on rapid dissemination of high-impact research in these areas.
期刊最新文献
“Buy him some Tesla stocks for his baptism”: Gender differences among young savers Google search and cross-section of cryptocurrency returns and trading activities Gender vs. personality: The role of masculinity in explaining cognitive style Risk is in the eye of the investor: Cryptocurrency investors’ engagement with risk, regulatory advice, and regulatory institutions Revisiting financial fragility during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Taiwan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1