{"title":"Which financial inclusion indicators and dimensions matter for income inequality? A Bayesian model averaging approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00181-024-02559-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This paper employs Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and uses posterior inclusion probability (PIP) values to evaluate which financial inclusion indicators, dimensions, and other determinants of income inequality should be considered in an empirical specification assessing the relationship between financial inclusion and income inequality, given model uncertainty. The results show that for the lower income country group, financial access and usage indicators are the most relevant financial inclusion indicators. For financial inclusion dimension, we find evidence on the importance of financial access. However, the results for upper income country group are different, suggesting the need to differentiate between the two groups in assessing the importance of financial inclusion on income inequality. These results suggest that theoretical models linking financial inclusion and income inequality could well focus on the role of financial access by providing theoretical foundations on the mechanics as to how this dimension of financial inclusion impact income inequality particularly for lower income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11642,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Economics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02559-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper employs Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and uses posterior inclusion probability (PIP) values to evaluate which financial inclusion indicators, dimensions, and other determinants of income inequality should be considered in an empirical specification assessing the relationship between financial inclusion and income inequality, given model uncertainty. The results show that for the lower income country group, financial access and usage indicators are the most relevant financial inclusion indicators. For financial inclusion dimension, we find evidence on the importance of financial access. However, the results for upper income country group are different, suggesting the need to differentiate between the two groups in assessing the importance of financial inclusion on income inequality. These results suggest that theoretical models linking financial inclusion and income inequality could well focus on the role of financial access by providing theoretical foundations on the mechanics as to how this dimension of financial inclusion impact income inequality particularly for lower income countries.
期刊介绍：
Empirical Economics publishes high quality papers using econometric or statistical methods to fill the gap between economic theory and observed data. Papers explore such topics as estimation of established relationships between economic variables, testing of hypotheses derived from economic theory, treatment effect estimation, policy evaluation, simulation, forecasting, as well as econometric methods and measurement. Empirical Economics emphasizes the replicability of empirical results. Replication studies of important results in the literature - both positive and negative results - may be published as short papers in Empirical Economics. Authors of all accepted papers and replications are required to submit all data and codes prior to publication (for more details, see: Instructions for Authors).The journal follows a single blind review procedure. In order to ensure the high quality of the journal and an efficient editorial process, a substantial number of submissions that have very poor chances of receiving positive reviews are routinely rejected without sending the papers for review.Officially cited as: Empir Econ
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
