Participatory Process Evaluation of Flexible and Integrative Treatment (FIT) Models in German Psychiatry – A Mixed Method Study

IF 3.8 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Mixed Methods Research Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI:10.1177/15586898241233311
S. von Peter, J. Ziegenhagen, L. Göppert, R. K. Glück, P. Jänchen, F. Baum, A. Neumann, T. Beeker, J. Schwarz, M. Heinze, J. Timm, Y. Ignatyev
{"title":"Participatory Process Evaluation of Flexible and Integrative Treatment (FIT) Models in German Psychiatry – A Mixed Method Study","authors":"S. von Peter, J. Ziegenhagen, L. Göppert, R. K. Glück, P. Jänchen, F. Baum, A. Neumann, T. Beeker, J. Schwarz, M. Heinze, J. Timm, Y. Ignatyev","doi":"10.1177/15586898241233311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flexible and integrative treatment (FIT) services in Germany make it possible to shift mental health inpatient care to day- and outpatient care. This paper presents the results of the mixed methods, participatory process evaluation (= PE) of the PsychCare clinical trial, which compares the outcomes of nine FIT departments to those of eight standard mental health care services. This PE integrates diverse data using a program theory and data transformation approach. It shows various implementation types of FIT services and how their processes and structures are distinct from those of control conditions, also experienced by service users. It contributes to mixed methods research by showing that the PE methodological frame is a valuable tool to effectively involve service users and other stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":47844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241233311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexible and integrative treatment (FIT) services in Germany make it possible to shift mental health inpatient care to day- and outpatient care. This paper presents the results of the mixed methods, participatory process evaluation (= PE) of the PsychCare clinical trial, which compares the outcomes of nine FIT departments to those of eight standard mental health care services. This PE integrates diverse data using a program theory and data transformation approach. It shows various implementation types of FIT services and how their processes and structures are distinct from those of control conditions, also experienced by service users. It contributes to mixed methods research by showing that the PE methodological frame is a valuable tool to effectively involve service users and other stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国精神病学中灵活与综合治疗 (FIT) 模式的参与式过程评估--一项混合方法研究
德国的灵活综合治疗(FIT)服务使精神疾病住院治疗转为日间和门诊治疗成为可能。本文介绍了 "心理护理"(PsychCare)临床试验的混合方法参与式过程评估(=PE)的结果,该评估比较了九个 FIT 部门与八个标准心理保健服务部门的结果。该参与式过程评估采用项目理论和数据转换方法整合了各种数据。它展示了 FIT 服务的各种实施类型,以及它们的流程和结构与对照条件下的流程和结构的不同之处,这些也是服务使用者所体验到的。该研究表明,PE 方法框架是有效吸引服务使用者和其他利益相关者参与的重要工具,从而为混合方法研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Journal of Mixed Methods Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
28.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mixed Methods Research serves as a premiere outlet for ground-breaking and seminal work in the field of mixed methods research. Of primary importance will be building an international and multidisciplinary community of mixed methods researchers. The journal''s scope includes exploring a global terminology and nomenclature for mixed methods research, delineating where mixed methods research may be used most effectively, creating the paradigmatic and philosophical foundations for mixed methods research, illuminating design and procedure issues, and determining the logistics of conducting mixed methods research. JMMR invites articles from a wide variety of international perspectives, including academics and practitioners from psychology, sociology, education, evaluation, health sciences, geography, communication, management, family studies, marketing, social work, and other related disciplines across the social, behavioral, and human sciences.
期刊最新文献
Multi-Resolution Design: Using Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses to Recursively Zoom in and out of the Same Dataset In This Issue: Artificial Intelligence, Bridging Methodological Divides Through Mixed Methods, Literature Reviews, Integration of Structural Equation Modeling and Autoethnography, and Research Problems in Mixed Methods Media Review: The Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods Research Design In This Issue: Special Issue Dedicated to Michael D. Fetters Weighing Mixing in a Decision About Priority in Mixed Methods Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1