Comparisons of external load variables among periods, playing status, and positions in professional soccer team: A case study

Hadi Nobari, Amir Barjaste, Alexandre Duarte Martins, Rafael Oliveira
{"title":"Comparisons of external load variables among periods, playing status, and positions in professional soccer team: A case study","authors":"Hadi Nobari, Amir Barjaste, Alexandre Duarte Martins, Rafael Oliveira","doi":"10.1177/17543371231225285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this study were to compare weekly variations of training monotony (TM) and training strain (TS) among periods of the season, playing status and playing positions in professional soccer athletes. Nineteen male professional soccer players were monitored daily over a 43-week period for their total distance, sprint distance (&gt;23 km h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), acceleration (Acc, &gt;4 m s<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>), and decelerations numbers (Dec, &gt;−4 m s<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>). Players were divided in groups of 10 starters and 9 non-starters; and by three central defenders (CD), four wide defenders (WD), four central midfielders (CM), four wide midfielders (WM), and four strikers (ST). Season data was divided in pre-, early-, mid-, and end-season. There were significant differences for TM through sprint distance between playing positions in mid- and full-season. In mid-season, sprint distance was meaningfully greater for CD than WD ( p = 0.006; g = 1.74 [0.06, 3.95]), CM ( p = 0.002; g = 2.04 [0.28, 4.46]), WM ( p = 0.005; g = 1.78 [0.09, 4.02]), and ST ( p = 0.002; g = 2.05 [0.28, 4.46]). Regarding full-season, TM of sprint distance was significantly greater for CD than WD ( p = 0.031; g = 1.59 [−0.04, 3.73]), CM ( p = 0.011; g = 1.83 [0.13, 4.11]), and ST ( p = 0.023; g = 1.52 [−0.10, 3.59]). The study revealed that TM and TS of sprint distance in mid-season was meaningfully greater for CD than for WD, CM, WM, and ST. No differences between starters and non-starters were found.","PeriodicalId":20674,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231225285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare weekly variations of training monotony (TM) and training strain (TS) among periods of the season, playing status and playing positions in professional soccer athletes. Nineteen male professional soccer players were monitored daily over a 43-week period for their total distance, sprint distance (>23 km h−1), acceleration (Acc, >4 m s−2), and decelerations numbers (Dec, >−4 m s−2). Players were divided in groups of 10 starters and 9 non-starters; and by three central defenders (CD), four wide defenders (WD), four central midfielders (CM), four wide midfielders (WM), and four strikers (ST). Season data was divided in pre-, early-, mid-, and end-season. There were significant differences for TM through sprint distance between playing positions in mid- and full-season. In mid-season, sprint distance was meaningfully greater for CD than WD ( p = 0.006; g = 1.74 [0.06, 3.95]), CM ( p = 0.002; g = 2.04 [0.28, 4.46]), WM ( p = 0.005; g = 1.78 [0.09, 4.02]), and ST ( p = 0.002; g = 2.05 [0.28, 4.46]). Regarding full-season, TM of sprint distance was significantly greater for CD than WD ( p = 0.031; g = 1.59 [−0.04, 3.73]), CM ( p = 0.011; g = 1.83 [0.13, 4.11]), and ST ( p = 0.023; g = 1.52 [−0.10, 3.59]). The study revealed that TM and TS of sprint distance in mid-season was meaningfully greater for CD than for WD, CM, WM, and ST. No differences between starters and non-starters were found.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业足球队不同时期、不同比赛状态和不同位置的外部负荷变量比较:案例研究
本研究的目的是比较职业足球运动员每周训练单调性(TM)和训练应变(TS)在不同赛季、比赛状态和比赛位置之间的变化。在为期 43 周的时间里,对 19 名男性职业足球运动员的总距离、冲刺距离(23 km h-1)、加速度(Acc, >4 m s-2)和减速数(Dec, >-4 m s-2)进行了每日监测。球员被分为 10 个首发球员组和 9 个非首发球员组,以及 3 个中卫(CD)、4 个边后卫(WD)、4 个中场(CM)、4 个边前卫(WM)和 4 个前锋(ST)组。赛季数据分为赛季前、赛季初、赛季中和赛季末。在赛季中期和赛季末,不同位置的球员通过冲刺距离获得的TM存在明显差异。在赛季中期,CD 的冲刺距离明显大于 WD(p = 0.006;g = 1.74 [0.06,3.95])、CM(p = 0.002;g = 2.04 [0.28,4.46])、WM(p = 0.005;g = 1.78 [0.09,4.02])和 ST(p = 0.002;g = 2.05 [0.28,4.46])。在全赛季方面,CD 的短跑距离 TM 显著大于 WD(p = 0.031;g = 1.59 [-0.04, 3.73])、CM(p = 0.011;g = 1.83 [0.13, 4.11])和 ST(p = 0.023;g = 1.52 [-0.10, 3.59])。研究显示,在赛季中期,CD 的短跑距离 TM 和 TS 显著大于 WD、CM、WM 和 ST。没有发现起跑者和非起跑者之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology covers the development of novel sports apparel, footwear, and equipment; and the materials, instrumentation, and processes that make advances in sports possible.
期刊最新文献
Effects of training repetition on young footballers’ tactical and physical performances: free and conditioned large-sided games A single trunk-mounted wearable sensor to measure motor performance in triathletes during competition The effectiveness of chalk as a friction modifier for finger pad contact with rocks of varying roughness In-plane density gradation of shoe midsoles for optimal energy absorption performance Development of a video-based test for assessing decision-making proficiency in football referees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1