The Revenue Impact of Differential Seat Pricing and Competition in the Movie Theater Market

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Industrial Organization Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s11151-024-09944-2
Gihwan Yi, Min Kim, Hoe Sang Chung
{"title":"The Revenue Impact of Differential Seat Pricing and Competition in the Movie Theater Market","authors":"Gihwan Yi, Min Kim, Hoe Sang Chung","doi":"10.1007/s11151-024-09944-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study empirically investigates the revenue return to differential seat pricing in the Korean movie theater market and how it is affected by competition. In March 2016, one of three major multiplex chains in the market divided the seats in most of its screening auditoria into prime (high-quality), standard (medium-quality), and economy (low-quality) zones, and started charging different prices for each seating zone. For the analysis, we construct a unique dataset that contains ticket prices and the number of tickets that are sold at the show level. We find that differential seat pricing increases revenue on average by 10.6%, but does not affect the number of tickets sold. Based on the results, we suggest that in a situation in which a large number of seats remain unsold, the pricing scheme involves encouraging the sale of the prime zone seats by increasing their price only slightly. By measuring the degree of competition as the number of showings of the same movie that are played by neighboring theaters at a similar time, we also find that competition has a small negative effect on the revenue gain from differential seat pricing. This finding may be explained by switching costs that are due to moviegoers’ being away from preferred theater locations and showtimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47454,"journal":{"name":"Review of Industrial Organization","volume":"78 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Industrial Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-024-09944-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the revenue return to differential seat pricing in the Korean movie theater market and how it is affected by competition. In March 2016, one of three major multiplex chains in the market divided the seats in most of its screening auditoria into prime (high-quality), standard (medium-quality), and economy (low-quality) zones, and started charging different prices for each seating zone. For the analysis, we construct a unique dataset that contains ticket prices and the number of tickets that are sold at the show level. We find that differential seat pricing increases revenue on average by 10.6%, but does not affect the number of tickets sold. Based on the results, we suggest that in a situation in which a large number of seats remain unsold, the pricing scheme involves encouraging the sale of the prime zone seats by increasing their price only slightly. By measuring the degree of competition as the number of showings of the same movie that are played by neighboring theaters at a similar time, we also find that competition has a small negative effect on the revenue gain from differential seat pricing. This finding may be explained by switching costs that are due to moviegoers’ being away from preferred theater locations and showtimes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差别座位定价和竞争对电影院市场收入的影响
本研究通过实证研究,探讨了韩国电影院市场座位差别定价的收益回报,以及竞争对其产生的影响。2016 年 3 月,市场上三大连锁多厅影院之一将其大部分放映厅的座位划分为黄金(高品质)区、标准(中等品质)区和经济(低品质)区,并开始对每个座位区收取不同的价格。为了进行分析,我们构建了一个独特的数据集,其中包含了票价和演出层面的售票数量。我们发现,不同座位定价平均增加了 10.6% 的收入,但并不影响售票数量。基于上述结果,我们认为,在大量座位仍未售出的情况下,定价方案只需略微提高黄金区域座位的价格,即可鼓励其售出。通过衡量竞争程度,即相邻影院在相近时间播放同一部电影的场次,我们还发现,竞争对差别座位定价的收入收益有很小的负面影响。这一结果可以用转换成本来解释,因为电影观众离开了首选的影院地点和放映时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: New Online Manuscript Submission System The Review of Industrial Organization publishes research papers on all aspects of industrial organization, broadly defined. A main focus is on competition and monopoly, in their many forms and processes and their effects on efficiency, innovation, and social conditions. Topics may range from the internal organization of enterprises to wide international comparisons. The Review is also increasing its interest in papers on public policies such as antitrust, regulation, deregulation, public enterprise, and privatization. Papers may deal with any economic sectors and any developed economies. The Review continues its primary interest in ideas that can be verified by econometric evidence, case studies, or other real conditions. But the Review also seeks papers that advance significant theories of industrial organization and policy. Papers using abstract techniques and econometric tests should present the methods and analysis in plain enough English so that non-specialist readers can evaluate the content. The Review welcomes submissions from any source, and the Editors will make every effort to have papers reviewed quickly and to give prompt decisions. The Editors will also seek to arrange symposia on specific topics, and they are open to proposals for grouped papers. They also welcome shorter notes and commentaries on topics of interest to the profession. Officially cited as: Rev Ind Organ
期刊最新文献
A Transactions Cost Analysis of the Welfare and Output Effects of Rebates and Non-Linear Pricing Cartel Damages Claims, Passing-On, and Passing-Back Location, Location, Quality:The Fixed Differentiation Principle The Coase Conjecture When the Monopolist and Customers have Different Discount Rates Heterogeneous Tax-Cut Pass-Through and Market Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1