In Pursuit of Impact: How Psychological Contract Research Can Make the Work-World a Better Place

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Group & Organization Management Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1177/10596011241233019
Johannes M. Kraak, Samantha D. Hansen, Yannick Griep, Sudeshna Bhattacharya, Neva Bojovic, Marjo-Riitta Diehl, Kayla Evans, Jesse Fenneman, Iqra Ishaque Memon, Marion Fortin, Annica Lau, Hugh Lee, Junghyun Lee, Xander Lub, Ines Meyer, Marc Ohana, Pascale Peters, Denise M. Rousseau, René Schalk, Rosalind H. Searle, Ultan Sherman, Amanuel Tekleab
{"title":"In Pursuit of Impact: How Psychological Contract Research Can Make the Work-World a Better Place","authors":"Johannes M. Kraak, Samantha D. Hansen, Yannick Griep, Sudeshna Bhattacharya, Neva Bojovic, Marjo-Riitta Diehl, Kayla Evans, Jesse Fenneman, Iqra Ishaque Memon, Marion Fortin, Annica Lau, Hugh Lee, Junghyun Lee, Xander Lub, Ines Meyer, Marc Ohana, Pascale Peters, Denise M. Rousseau, René Schalk, Rosalind H. Searle, Ultan Sherman, Amanuel Tekleab","doi":"10.1177/10596011241233019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the result of the collective work undertaken by a group of Psychological Contract (PC) and Sustainability scholars from around the world, following the 2023 Bi-Annual PC Small Group Conference (Kedge Business School, Bordeaux, France). As part of the conference, scholars engaged in a workshop designed to generate expert guidance on how to aid the PC field to be better aligned with the needs of practice, and thus, impact the creation and maintenance of high-quality and sustainable exchange processes at work. In accordance with accreditation bodies for higher education, research impact is not limited to academic papers alone but also includes practitioners, policymakers, and students in its scope. This paper therefore incorporates elements from an impact measurement tool for higher education in management so as to explore how PC scholars can bolster the beneficial influence of PC knowledge on employment relationships through different stakeholders and means. Accordingly, our proposals for the pursuit of PC impact are organized in three parts: (1) research, (2) practice and society, and (3) students. Further, this paper contributes to the emerging debate on sustainable PCs by developing a construct definition and integrating PCs with an ‘ethics of care’ perspective.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241233019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is the result of the collective work undertaken by a group of Psychological Contract (PC) and Sustainability scholars from around the world, following the 2023 Bi-Annual PC Small Group Conference (Kedge Business School, Bordeaux, France). As part of the conference, scholars engaged in a workshop designed to generate expert guidance on how to aid the PC field to be better aligned with the needs of practice, and thus, impact the creation and maintenance of high-quality and sustainable exchange processes at work. In accordance with accreditation bodies for higher education, research impact is not limited to academic papers alone but also includes practitioners, policymakers, and students in its scope. This paper therefore incorporates elements from an impact measurement tool for higher education in management so as to explore how PC scholars can bolster the beneficial influence of PC knowledge on employment relationships through different stakeholders and means. Accordingly, our proposals for the pursuit of PC impact are organized in three parts: (1) research, (2) practice and society, and (3) students. Further, this paper contributes to the emerging debate on sustainable PCs by developing a construct definition and integrating PCs with an ‘ethics of care’ perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追求影响力:心理契约研究如何让工作世界更美好
本文是继 2023 年一年两次的心理契约(PC)小组会议(法国波尔多凯杰商学院)之后,一群来自世界各地的心理契约(PC)与可持续发展学者的集体工作成果。作为会议的一部分,学者们参加了一个研讨会,旨在就如何帮助个人责任领域更好地与实践需求保持一致提供专家指导,从而对创造和维护高质量和可持续的工作交流过程产生影响。根据高等教育认证机构的规定,研究影响不仅限于学术论文,还包括从业人员、决策者和学生。因此,本文纳入了管理学高等教育影响力衡量工具的要素,以探讨个人电脑学者如何通过不同的利益相关者和手段来加强个人电脑知识对雇佣关系的有益影响。因此,我们对追求 PC 影响力的建议分为三个部分:(1) 研究;(2) 实践与社会;(3) 学生。此外,本文还提出了可持续个人电脑的概念定义,并将个人电脑与 "关爱伦理 "观点相结合,从而为正在兴起的关于可持续个人电脑的讨论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Drivers for Nominating First Women Executives: Empirical Evidence From Japanese Firms The Value of Small Samples to Groups and Teams Research: Accumulating Knowledge across Philosophies of Science It’s About Time! Understanding the Dynamic Team Process-Performance Relationship Using Micro- and Macroscale Time Lenses Women’s Double Penalty During Telework: A Mixed Method Investigation of the Gender Effect of Interruptions Between Work and Childcare When Does Entrepreneurs’ Impression Management Enhance Their Networking Performance? The Cross-Level Moderating Role of Collective Altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1