A Framework for Deepening Racial Equity in Prenatal-Grade Three Systems: Lessons From a 10-Year Reflective Case Study

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Policy Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1177/08959048241231957
Beth L. Green, Lindsey B. Patterson, Caitlin R. Houser
{"title":"A Framework for Deepening Racial Equity in Prenatal-Grade Three Systems: Lessons From a 10-Year Reflective Case Study","authors":"Beth L. Green, Lindsey B. Patterson, Caitlin R. Houser","doi":"10.1177/08959048241231957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses a reflective, retrospective case study methodology to analyze data from a 10-year University-Community partnership focused on supporting implementation and improvement of a Prenatal-Grade 3 (P3) system in an elementary school. Using a framework for centering equity in Collective Impact approaches, we analyze the steps we took as research partners/program evaluators to address racial and other inequities while highlighting missed opportunities to better center racial equity in the evaluation and P3 Initiative work. Through our analysis, we seek to identify where and how racial inequities surfaced, to describe how systemic racism influenced the evaluation and P3 Initiative process, and how this served to perpetuate the status quo and prevent transformative systems change. Results speak to opportunities for researchers, funders, and policymakers to identify and disrupt conventionally-accepted approaches to educational research and to work more effectively to advance educational equity for children and their families.","PeriodicalId":47728,"journal":{"name":"Educational Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048241231957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper uses a reflective, retrospective case study methodology to analyze data from a 10-year University-Community partnership focused on supporting implementation and improvement of a Prenatal-Grade 3 (P3) system in an elementary school. Using a framework for centering equity in Collective Impact approaches, we analyze the steps we took as research partners/program evaluators to address racial and other inequities while highlighting missed opportunities to better center racial equity in the evaluation and P3 Initiative work. Through our analysis, we seek to identify where and how racial inequities surfaced, to describe how systemic racism influenced the evaluation and P3 Initiative process, and how this served to perpetuate the status quo and prevent transformative systems change. Results speak to opportunities for researchers, funders, and policymakers to identify and disrupt conventionally-accepted approaches to educational research and to work more effectively to advance educational equity for children and their families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深化产前至三年级系统中种族平等的框架:十年反思性案例研究的经验教训
本文采用反思性、回顾性案例研究的方法,分析了大学与社区十年合作的数据,重点是支持一所小学实施和改进 "产前-三年级"(P3)系统。利用集体影响方法中以公平为中心的框架,我们分析了我们作为研究合作伙伴/项目评估者为解决种族和其他不公平问题所采取的措施,同时强调了在评估和 P3 计划工作中为更好地以种族公平为中心而错失的机会。通过分析,我们试图确定种族不平等在哪里以及如何浮现出来,描述系统性种族主义如何影响评估和 P3 计划的进程,以及如何使现状永久化并阻止变革性的系统变化。研究结果表明,研究人员、资助者和政策制定者有机会确定并打破常规的教育研究方法,更有效地促进儿童及其家庭的教育公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Policy
Educational Policy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Educational Policy provides an interdisciplinary forum for improving education in primary and secondary schools, as well as in high education and non school settings. Educational Policy blends the best of educational research with the world of practice, making it valuable resource for educators, policy makers, administrators, researchers, teachers, and graduate students. Educational Policy is concerned with the practical consequences of policy decisions and alternatives. It examines the relationship between educational policy and educational practice, and sheds new light on important debates and controversies within the field. You"ll find that Educational Policy is an insightful compilation of ideas, strategies, and analyses for improving our educational systems.
期刊最新文献
Principal Leadership of Pre-K Programs in Elementary Schools: Evidence from North Carolina Educational Policy: Analysis, Action, and Advocacy Across Contexts The Relationship Between Teacher Collaboration and Instructional Practices, Instructional Climate, and Social Relations Associations Between Administrative Burden and Children’s ECE Stability During the Covid-19 Pandemic Educational Philanthropy’s “Racial Reckoning” in the Wake of 2020: Understanding Grantmakers’ Responses to Racialized Crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1