More Than One Way: Fifth-Graders’ Varied Digital Reading Behaviors and Comprehension Outcomes

IF 3.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Aera Open Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1177/23328584241226633
Amanda Yoshiko Shimizu, Michael Havazelet, Amanda P. Goodwin
{"title":"More Than One Way: Fifth-Graders’ Varied Digital Reading Behaviors and Comprehension Outcomes","authors":"Amanda Yoshiko Shimizu, Michael Havazelet, Amanda P. Goodwin","doi":"10.1177/23328584241226633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital reading is ubiquitous, yet understanding digital reading processes and links to comprehension remains underdeveloped. Guided by new literacies and active reading theories, this study explored the reading behaviors and comprehension of thirteen fifth graders who read static digital texts. We coded for the quantity and quality of digital reading behaviors and employed action path diagrams to connect behaviors to comprehension. We used timescape analyses to visualize how behaviors were orchestrated differently across readers. Findings showed no single behavior was related directly to comprehension, indicating varying pathways to digital reading success. Occasional rereading seemed to support active reading and improved comprehension. Instances of students subverting expected digital tools were observed. Minor distractions like mind-wandering did not link to poor performance. This research deepens our understanding of self-monitoring and active reading in static digital contexts, offering insights for future study of more complex digital reading contexts like reading on the internet.","PeriodicalId":31132,"journal":{"name":"Aera Open","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aera Open","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241226633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital reading is ubiquitous, yet understanding digital reading processes and links to comprehension remains underdeveloped. Guided by new literacies and active reading theories, this study explored the reading behaviors and comprehension of thirteen fifth graders who read static digital texts. We coded for the quantity and quality of digital reading behaviors and employed action path diagrams to connect behaviors to comprehension. We used timescape analyses to visualize how behaviors were orchestrated differently across readers. Findings showed no single behavior was related directly to comprehension, indicating varying pathways to digital reading success. Occasional rereading seemed to support active reading and improved comprehension. Instances of students subverting expected digital tools were observed. Minor distractions like mind-wandering did not link to poor performance. This research deepens our understanding of self-monitoring and active reading in static digital contexts, offering insights for future study of more complex digital reading contexts like reading on the internet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不止一种方式:五年级学生不同的数字阅读行为和理解结果
数字阅读无处不在,但人们对数字阅读过程及其与理解能力之间联系的了解仍然不足。本研究以新文学和主动阅读理论为指导,探讨了 13 名五年级学生阅读静态数字文本的阅读行为和理解能力。我们对数字阅读行为的数量和质量进行了编码,并采用行动路径图将行为与理解联系起来。我们利用时景分析来直观地展示不同读者的不同阅读行为。研究结果表明,没有任何一种行为与理解能力直接相关,这表明数字阅读成功的途径各不相同。偶尔重读似乎有助于积极阅读和提高理解能力。我们还观察到学生颠覆预期数字工具的情况。轻微的分心行为,如胡思乱想,与成绩不佳并无关联。这项研究加深了我们对静态数字情境中自我监控和主动阅读的理解,为今后研究更复杂的数字阅读情境(如互联网阅读)提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aera Open
Aera Open EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cross-National Comparison of the Relative Size of Lower-Tail and Upper-Tail SES Achievement Gaps Measuring the Efficacy of Zearn Math in Louisiana Undergraduate Grading Practices of International and Domestic Faculty: Evidence From Three Large U.S. Public Universities Does Knowing the Word Matter for Preschool DLLS? Individualized Vocabulary Words on Phonological Awareness Performance Silent Covenants and Structural Barriers: State Standards Committees and the Maintenance of Race-Evasive Social Studies Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1