Academic community’s use of university digital library and their searching behaviour

Azra Rafique, Kanwal Ameen, Alia Arshad
{"title":"Academic community’s use of university digital library and their searching behaviour","authors":"Azra Rafique, Kanwal Ameen, Alia Arshad","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-08-2023-0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore the evidence-based usage patterns of higher education commission (HEC) subscribed e-journal databases in the university digital library used by the scholarly community and the academics’ online searching behaviour at a higher education institution in Pakistan.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach. Raw transaction log data were collected for quantitative analysis, and the interview technique was used for qualitative data collection and thematic analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nLog analysis revealed that HEC subscribed databases were used significantly, and among those, scholarly databases covering various subjects were more frequently used than subject-specific society-based databases. Furthermore, the users frequently accessed the needed e-journal articles through search engines like Google and Google Scholar, considering them sources of free material instead of the HEC subscribed databases.\n\n\nPractical implications\nIt provides practical implications for examining the evidence-based use patterns of e-journal databases. It suggests the need for improving the access management of HEC databases, keeping in view the usage statistics and the demands of the scholars. The study may also help create market venues for the publishers of scholarly databases by offering attractive and economical packages for researchers of various disciplines in developing and underdeveloped countries. The study results also guide the information professionals to arrange orientation and information literacy programs to improve the searching behaviour of their less frequent users and enhance the utilization of these subscribed databases.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study is part of a PhD project and, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, is the first such work in the context of a developing country like Pakistan.\n","PeriodicalId":507843,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-08-2023-0313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the evidence-based usage patterns of higher education commission (HEC) subscribed e-journal databases in the university digital library used by the scholarly community and the academics’ online searching behaviour at a higher education institution in Pakistan. Design/methodology/approach The study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach. Raw transaction log data were collected for quantitative analysis, and the interview technique was used for qualitative data collection and thematic analysis. Findings Log analysis revealed that HEC subscribed databases were used significantly, and among those, scholarly databases covering various subjects were more frequently used than subject-specific society-based databases. Furthermore, the users frequently accessed the needed e-journal articles through search engines like Google and Google Scholar, considering them sources of free material instead of the HEC subscribed databases. Practical implications It provides practical implications for examining the evidence-based use patterns of e-journal databases. It suggests the need for improving the access management of HEC databases, keeping in view the usage statistics and the demands of the scholars. The study may also help create market venues for the publishers of scholarly databases by offering attractive and economical packages for researchers of various disciplines in developing and underdeveloped countries. The study results also guide the information professionals to arrange orientation and information literacy programs to improve the searching behaviour of their less frequent users and enhance the utilization of these subscribed databases. Originality/value The study is part of a PhD project and, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, is the first such work in the context of a developing country like Pakistan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术界对大学数字图书馆的使用及其搜索行为
目的 本研究旨在探讨巴基斯坦一所高等教育机构中学术界使用的高等教育委员会(HEC)订阅的大学数字图书馆电子期刊数据库的循证使用模式以及学术界的在线搜索行为。研究结果日志分析表明,HEC 订阅数据库的使用率很高,其中,涵盖各学科的学术数据库的使用率高于特定学科的社会数据库。此外,用户经常通过谷歌和谷歌学术等搜索引擎获取所需的电子期刊论文,认为它们是免费资料的来源,而不是高等电子教育订阅数据库。研究表明,有必要根据使用统计数据和学者的需求改进高等电子教育学院数据库的访问管理。这项研究还有助于为学术数据库出版商创造市场机会,为发展中国家和欠发达国家的各学科研究人员提供有吸引力的经济套餐。研究结果还可以指导信息专业人员安排指导和信息扫盲计划,以改善不经常使用数据库的用户的搜索行为,提高这些已订阅数据库的利用率。 原创性/价值 本研究是一个博士项目的一部分,据作者所知,这是在巴基斯坦这样的发展中国家开展的第一项此类工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Farmers’ access to agricultural information sources: a study of Lakadong turmeric farmers Understanding Malaysia’s perceived destination image formation through online user-generated content information qualities Farmers’ access to agricultural information sources: a study of Lakadong turmeric farmers Understanding Malaysia’s perceived destination image formation through online user-generated content information qualities Enhancing service delivery through digital transformation in the public sector in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1