Balancing acts of kindness: Reassessing the relationship between informal helping and formal volunteering

Hans-Peter Y. Qvist
{"title":"Balancing acts of kindness: Reassessing the relationship between informal helping and formal volunteering","authors":"Hans-Peter Y. Qvist","doi":"10.1177/00016993241233431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although time is a finite resource, much sociological research suggests a positive association between engagement in informal helping activities and formal volunteering. However, it remains unclear whether this relationship is causal and, if so, in which direction the causality runs. To address these issues, I draw on two-wave panel data from Denmark. Using a cross-lagged panel model, I find no evidence that formal volunteering hours affect informal helping activities. However, in the reverse direction, I find evidence of a right-skewed inverse U-shaped relationship. Specifically, the time individuals dedicate to formal volunteering marginally increases with time allocated to informal helping activities, but only as long as their informal helping obligations remain modest. However, once these informal helping obligations reach approximately 20 hours, the time individuals spend on formal volunteering decreases with informal helping hours. These findings suggest that even exceptionally helpful individuals, often referred to as “super-helpers,” must balance their acts of kindness and their available time and energy. Moreover, I argue that while many people are motivated to engage in formal volunteering to benefit others, those with family and friends requiring assistance tend to prioritize these responsibilities before volunteering.","PeriodicalId":504233,"journal":{"name":"Acta Sociologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993241233431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although time is a finite resource, much sociological research suggests a positive association between engagement in informal helping activities and formal volunteering. However, it remains unclear whether this relationship is causal and, if so, in which direction the causality runs. To address these issues, I draw on two-wave panel data from Denmark. Using a cross-lagged panel model, I find no evidence that formal volunteering hours affect informal helping activities. However, in the reverse direction, I find evidence of a right-skewed inverse U-shaped relationship. Specifically, the time individuals dedicate to formal volunteering marginally increases with time allocated to informal helping activities, but only as long as their informal helping obligations remain modest. However, once these informal helping obligations reach approximately 20 hours, the time individuals spend on formal volunteering decreases with informal helping hours. These findings suggest that even exceptionally helpful individuals, often referred to as “super-helpers,” must balance their acts of kindness and their available time and energy. Moreover, I argue that while many people are motivated to engage in formal volunteering to benefit others, those with family and friends requiring assistance tend to prioritize these responsibilities before volunteering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡善举:重新评估非正式帮助与正式志愿服务之间的关系
虽然时间是有限的资源,但许多社会学研究表明,参与非正式帮助活动与正式志愿服务之间存在正相关。然而,这种关系是否是因果关系,以及如果是的话,因果关系的方向是什么,目前仍不清楚。为了解决这些问题,我利用了丹麦的两波面板数据。利用跨滞后面板模型,我没有发现正式志愿服务时数影响非正式帮助活动的证据。然而,从反向来看,我发现了右斜反 U 型关系的证据。具体地说,个人用于正式志愿服务的时间会随着分配给非正式帮助活动的时间的增加而略有增加,但前提是他们的非正式帮助义务保持适度。然而,一旦这些非正式帮助义务达到约 20 个小时,个人用于正式志愿服务的时间就会随着非正式帮助时间的减少而减少。这些研究结果表明,即使是乐于助人的人,也就是人们常说的 "超级助人者",也必须在他们的善举和可用的时间与精力之间取得平衡。此外,我认为,虽然许多人都有参与正式志愿服务以造福他人的动机,但那些有家人和朋友需要帮助的人往往会优先考虑这些责任,而不是志愿服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social theory and the digital: The institutionalisation of digital sociology Towards ‘augmented sociology’? A practice-oriented framework for using large language model-powered chatbots “Unless I could be like the typical dad”: Exploring parenthood through the perspective of the voluntarily childfree Automation risks of vocational training programs and early careers in the Netherlands The natural dividend: An introduction to resource rents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1