Examining Faculty Perspectives on the Role and Value of Intercollegiate Athletics

Molly Harry, Daniel Springer
{"title":"Examining Faculty Perspectives on the Role and Value of Intercollegiate Athletics","authors":"Molly Harry, Daniel Springer","doi":"10.17161/jis.v17i1.20971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The uneasy marriage of higher education and athletics can be seen through the conceptual lenses of former institution and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) President Myles Brand’s Standard or Integrated View. The Standard View maintains that athletics serves as a business while the Integrated View argues that athletics should be appreciated as a form of education and art. Through these perspectives of athletics as a business, education, and art, this study surveyed faculty at one football bowl subdivision institution (n = 216) on their perceptions of athletics. Analyses demonstrated faculty perceptions were varied and contradictory as they noted athletics was simultaneously a business important for their institution, but also a detractor for higher education at large. Additionally, they perceived some developmental benefits of participation in athletics but still did not believe sports to be educational in nature. Implications for better understanding faculty perceptions of athletics while improving the education-sport marriage are discussed.","PeriodicalId":499745,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercollegiate Sport","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercollegiate Sport","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v17i1.20971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uneasy marriage of higher education and athletics can be seen through the conceptual lenses of former institution and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) President Myles Brand’s Standard or Integrated View. The Standard View maintains that athletics serves as a business while the Integrated View argues that athletics should be appreciated as a form of education and art. Through these perspectives of athletics as a business, education, and art, this study surveyed faculty at one football bowl subdivision institution (n = 216) on their perceptions of athletics. Analyses demonstrated faculty perceptions were varied and contradictory as they noted athletics was simultaneously a business important for their institution, but also a detractor for higher education at large. Additionally, they perceived some developmental benefits of participation in athletics but still did not believe sports to be educational in nature. Implications for better understanding faculty perceptions of athletics while improving the education-sport marriage are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察教师对校际田径运动的作用和价值的看法
高等教育与竞技体育的不稳定结合可以通过前院校和全国大学生体育协会(NCAA)主席迈尔斯-布兰德(Myles Brand)的 "标准观 "或 "综合观 "的概念视角来观察。标准观 "认为竞技体育是一种商业行为,而 "综合观 "则认为竞技体育应被视为一种教育和艺术。通过将竞技体育视为商业、教育和艺术的这些观点,本研究调查了一所橄榄球碗细分院校的教师(n = 216)对竞技体育的看法。分析表明,教职员工对竞技体育的看法多种多样,相互矛盾,他们认为竞技体育既是他们所在学校的一项重要业务,同时也是整个高等教育的一个不利因素。此外,他们认为参加体育运动对发展有一些好处,但仍然不认为体育运动具有教育性质。本文讨论了如何更好地理解教师对体育运动的看法,同时改善教育与体育的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identity Dynamics in Collegiate Olympic Athletes Post-Tokyo 2020: A Pre-Post Study Examining Faculty Perspectives on the Role and Value of Intercollegiate Athletics Examining the framing of mental health in Division I student-athlete handbooks Reframing the Service Environment in Collegiate Sport: A Transformative Sport Service Research Approach Good student-athlete representation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1