Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Models in Predicting the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease

Sina Moosavi Kashani, Sanaz Zargar Balaye Jame
{"title":"Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Models in Predicting the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease","authors":"Sina Moosavi Kashani, Sanaz Zargar Balaye Jame","doi":"10.5812/jamm-140885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant health burden worldwide, affecting approximately 10 - 15% of the global population. As one of the leading non-communicable diseases, CKD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Early identification of CKD is crucial for reducing its adverse effects on patient health. Prompt detection can significantly lessen the harmful consequences and enhance health outcomes for individuals with CKD. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various machine learning models in predicting the occurrence of CKD. Methods: The study involved the collection of data from a sample of 400 patients. We applied the well-established cross-industry standard process (CRISP) methodology for data mining to analyze the data. As part of this process, we efficiently handled missing data using the mode approach and addressed outliers through the interquartile range (IQR) method. We utilized sophisticated techniques, such as CatBoost (CB), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict outcomes. For evaluation, we used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated the area under the curve (AUC). Results: An analysis of 400 patient records in this study identified that variables like serum creatinine, packed cell volume, specific gravity, and hemoglobin were most influential in predicting CKD. The results indicated that the CB and RF models surpassed the ANN in predicting the disease. Ten critical predictors were pinpointed for accurate disease prediction. Conclusions: The ensemble models in this study not only showcased remarkable speed but also demonstrated superior accuracy. These findings suggest the potential of ensemble models as an effective tool for enhancing predictive performance in similar studies.","PeriodicalId":15058,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm-140885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant health burden worldwide, affecting approximately 10 - 15% of the global population. As one of the leading non-communicable diseases, CKD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Early identification of CKD is crucial for reducing its adverse effects on patient health. Prompt detection can significantly lessen the harmful consequences and enhance health outcomes for individuals with CKD. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various machine learning models in predicting the occurrence of CKD. Methods: The study involved the collection of data from a sample of 400 patients. We applied the well-established cross-industry standard process (CRISP) methodology for data mining to analyze the data. As part of this process, we efficiently handled missing data using the mode approach and addressed outliers through the interquartile range (IQR) method. We utilized sophisticated techniques, such as CatBoost (CB), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict outcomes. For evaluation, we used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated the area under the curve (AUC). Results: An analysis of 400 patient records in this study identified that variables like serum creatinine, packed cell volume, specific gravity, and hemoglobin were most influential in predicting CKD. The results indicated that the CB and RF models surpassed the ANN in predicting the disease. Ten critical predictors were pinpointed for accurate disease prediction. Conclusions: The ensemble models in this study not only showcased remarkable speed but also demonstrated superior accuracy. These findings suggest the potential of ensemble models as an effective tool for enhancing predictive performance in similar studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较机器学习模型在预测慢性肾病风险方面的性能
背景:慢性肾脏病(CKD)给全世界带来了巨大的健康负担,影响着全球约 10-15% 的人口。作为主要的非传染性疾病之一,慢性肾脏病是发病和死亡的主要原因。早期发现慢性肾功能衰竭对减少其对患者健康的不利影响至关重要。及时发现可大大减轻对慢性肾脏病患者的有害影响,并提高其健康状况。研究目的本研究旨在评估和比较各种机器学习模型在预测 CKD 发生方面的有效性。研究方法本研究收集了 400 名患者的样本数据。我们采用成熟的跨行业标准流程 (CRISP) 数据挖掘方法来分析数据。在这一过程中,我们使用模式法有效地处理了缺失数据,并通过四分位数间距 (IQR) 法处理了异常值。我们利用 CatBoost (CB)、随机森林 (RF) 和人工神经网络 (ANN) 模型等复杂技术来预测结果。在评估时,我们使用了接收者操作特征曲线(ROC),并计算了曲线下面积(AUC)。结果本研究对 400 份病历进行了分析,发现血清肌酐、全血细胞容积、比重和血红蛋白等变量对预测 CKD 的影响最大。结果表明,CB 和 RF 模型在预测疾病方面超过了 ANN。为准确预测疾病,确定了 10 个关键预测因子。结论本研究中的集合模型不仅速度惊人,而且准确性也很高。这些发现表明,在类似研究中,集合模型有可能成为提高预测性能的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Convolutional Neural Network Models for Emergency Department Patients’ Arrival Daily Forecasting Optimizing Emergency Department Resource Allocation Using Discrete Event Simulation and Machine Learning Techniques Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Models in Predicting the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Interpersonal Communication Skills of Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Establishment of a Military Field Hospital by Police Medical Workers in Procession of Arba'in: Sharing an Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1