Viral Fear or Panic Myth? Emotions in Ebola News and Social Media Responses

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Symbolic Interaction Pub Date : 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1002/symb.681
M. Cottingham
{"title":"Viral Fear or Panic Myth? Emotions in Ebola News and Social Media Responses","authors":"M. Cottingham","doi":"10.1002/symb.681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID‐19 pandemic has catalyzed debates about how the public and leaders respond to health threats and the role that the media and emotions play in these responses. Predating COVID‐19, the 2014 Ebola outbreak can serve as a case to examine the constructions and pervasiveness of fear discourse and other emotions in news and social media. In this mixed‐method study, we examine fear discourse in web‐based and traditional newspaper headlines and emergent emotions in social media data (Twitter) during the peak of Ebola coverage. Users discuss fear on Twitter in a variety of ways and there was an increase in Tweets following the first Ebola case in the United States. However, it is humor, not fear, that is the most dominant theme in Twitter responses. Claims by health leaders and media scholars, that information technology and social media spread fear, receive limited support. Prevalence of different emotions vary across format (headlines and social media) and have important implications for understanding the myths and realities of public responses to health threats.","PeriodicalId":47804,"journal":{"name":"Symbolic Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symbolic Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic has catalyzed debates about how the public and leaders respond to health threats and the role that the media and emotions play in these responses. Predating COVID‐19, the 2014 Ebola outbreak can serve as a case to examine the constructions and pervasiveness of fear discourse and other emotions in news and social media. In this mixed‐method study, we examine fear discourse in web‐based and traditional newspaper headlines and emergent emotions in social media data (Twitter) during the peak of Ebola coverage. Users discuss fear on Twitter in a variety of ways and there was an increase in Tweets following the first Ebola case in the United States. However, it is humor, not fear, that is the most dominant theme in Twitter responses. Claims by health leaders and media scholars, that information technology and social media spread fear, receive limited support. Prevalence of different emotions vary across format (headlines and social media) and have important implications for understanding the myths and realities of public responses to health threats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病毒恐惧还是恐慌神话?埃博拉新闻中的情绪和社交媒体的反应
COVID-19 大流行引发了关于公众和领导者如何应对健康威胁以及媒体和情绪在这些应对措施中所扮演角色的辩论。在 COVID-19 之前,2014 年爆发的埃博拉疫情可以作为一个案例,用于研究新闻和社交媒体中恐惧话语和其他情绪的构建和普遍性。在这项混合方法研究中,我们考察了在埃博拉报道高峰期,网络和传统报纸标题中的恐惧话语以及社交媒体数据(Twitter)中出现的情绪。用户在 Twitter 上以各种方式讨论恐惧,在美国出现首例埃博拉病例后,推文数量有所增加。然而,在 Twitter 的回复中,最主要的主题是幽默,而不是恐惧。卫生领导人和媒体学者关于信息技术和社交媒体传播恐惧的说法得到的支持有限。不同形式(头条新闻和社交媒体)中不同情绪的流行程度各不相同,这对于理解公众对健康威胁的反应的神话和现实具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction is a social science professional organization of scholars interested in qualitative, especially interactionist, research. The society organizes panels and sessions at annual conferences such as the American Sociological Association and Midwest Sociology Society Annual Meetings, and each Spring holds the Couch-Stone Symposium. As the main voice of the Symbolic Interactionist perspective, Symbolic Interaction brings you articles which showcase empirical research and theoretical development that resound throughout the fields of sociology, social psychology, communication, education, nursing, organizations, mass media, and others.
期刊最新文献
The “Actual Site” of Robots in Care Contemplating Phenomenology, Yoga, and the Embodied Sharing of Meaning Anonymity, Deception, and Power Dialogues of Self and Identity: Foundations for Collection Action Two Approaches to the Study of Music and Meaning in Everyday Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1