Enhancing data accuracy and reliability in maternal and child health: MCGL success story

Odipo Erick, Dan Rambo, Paul Odila, Deborah Sitrin, Alinda Ndenga, Collins Mukanya
{"title":"Enhancing data accuracy and reliability in maternal and child health: MCGL success story","authors":"Odipo Erick, Dan Rambo, Paul Odila, Deborah Sitrin, Alinda Ndenga, Collins Mukanya","doi":"10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBackground: Accurate maternal and child health data are essential for informed decision-making; however, maintaining consistent data quality in postnatal care and live birth records remains a persistent challenge. Since the inception of MCGL, discrepancies within these datasets have compromised the data's quality for decision making. Recognizing this, the need for an effective solution to rectify data integrity issues and enhance reliability became evident.\nMethods: Mentorship at the facility level was conducted for healthcare staff to ensure a clear understanding of indicators for accurate reporting, focusing on new data elements introduced in the KHIS 2020 revision. In collaboration with health information officers, the project monitoring, evaluation, and learning officer identified sets of indicators, along with closely related proxy indicators, for monitoring. A systematic approach was employed, involving a comparative analysis of primary indicators and corresponding proxy indicators. For instance, if 100 live births were recorded, an expectation of 100 infants receiving postnatal care within 48 hours was anticipated. Regular monthly communication was established with HRIOs to identify and validate discrepancies that emerged during the comparison.\nResults: Significant improvement in data quality was observed. From October 2020 to September 2021, 6,337 infants received PNC within 48 hours, accounting for 56% of the 11,309 live births. In the subsequent years (October 2021 to September 2022 and October 2022 to September 2023), this p increased to 89% and 92%, respectively.\nConclusion: The combined impact of mentorship and regular monthly communication can enhance data quality, instilling increased confidence in data use for informed decision making.","PeriodicalId":517202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","volume":"50 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate maternal and child health data are essential for informed decision-making; however, maintaining consistent data quality in postnatal care and live birth records remains a persistent challenge. Since the inception of MCGL, discrepancies within these datasets have compromised the data's quality for decision making. Recognizing this, the need for an effective solution to rectify data integrity issues and enhance reliability became evident. Methods: Mentorship at the facility level was conducted for healthcare staff to ensure a clear understanding of indicators for accurate reporting, focusing on new data elements introduced in the KHIS 2020 revision. In collaboration with health information officers, the project monitoring, evaluation, and learning officer identified sets of indicators, along with closely related proxy indicators, for monitoring. A systematic approach was employed, involving a comparative analysis of primary indicators and corresponding proxy indicators. For instance, if 100 live births were recorded, an expectation of 100 infants receiving postnatal care within 48 hours was anticipated. Regular monthly communication was established with HRIOs to identify and validate discrepancies that emerged during the comparison. Results: Significant improvement in data quality was observed. From October 2020 to September 2021, 6,337 infants received PNC within 48 hours, accounting for 56% of the 11,309 live births. In the subsequent years (October 2021 to September 2022 and October 2022 to September 2023), this p increased to 89% and 92%, respectively. Conclusion: The combined impact of mentorship and regular monthly communication can enhance data quality, instilling increased confidence in data use for informed decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高妇幼保健数据的准确性和可靠性:MCGL 成功案例
背景:准确的母婴健康数据对于知情决策至关重要;然而,保持产后护理和活产记录数据质量的一致性仍是一项长期挑战。自母婴性别平等项目启动以来,这些数据集中的差异已影响到决策数据的质量。有鉴于此,显然需要一个有效的解决方案来纠正数据完整性问题并提高可靠性:方法:在医疗机构层面对医护人员进行指导,以确保他们清楚了解准确报告的指标,重点关注《韩国医疗卫生信息系统》2020 年修订版中引入的新数据元素。项目监测、评估和学习官员与卫生信息官员合作,确定了用于监测的指标集以及密切相关的替代指标。项目采用了一种系统方法,包括对主要指标和相应的替代指标进行比较分析。例如,如果记录了 100 个活产婴儿,则预计有 100 个婴儿在 48 小时内接受了产后护理。每月与 HRIO 定期沟通,以确定和验证比较过程中出现的差异:数据质量显著提高。2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月,6337 名婴儿在 48 小时内接受了产后护理,占 11309 名活产婴儿的 56%。在随后几年(2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 9 月和 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 9 月),这一比例分别提高到 89% 和 92%:导师指导和每月定期沟通的综合影响可提高数据质量,增强人们使用数据做出明智决策的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDITORIAL: COVID-19 AND PREGNANCY Health system barriers to access to quality sexual and reproductive health and rights in relation to family planning and contraception Responding to preventable causes of maternal and perinatal deaths in Homabay County Measurement of safe and respectful maternity care in exit interviews following facility childbirth at the Lwala Community Health Centre Enhancing data accuracy and reliability in maternal and child health: MCGL success story
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1