Early versus late discharge from the hospital for low-risk parturients after spontaneous vaginal deliveries at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya: A randomized controlled trial.

Franklin Munene, Philip Tonui, B.E Odongo
{"title":"Early versus late discharge from the hospital for low-risk parturients after spontaneous vaginal deliveries at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Franklin Munene, Philip Tonui, B.E Odongo","doi":"10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The length of hospital stay after delivery is a major contributor to preventing postpartumcomplications and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Globally, the length of hospital stay afterdelivery has been reducing in recent times. However, there is limited understanding of the safety,outcomes, and complications of early discharge compared with late discharge in low- and middle-incomesettings.\nObjectives: To evaluate the outcomes of early versus late discharge from the hospital for post-spontaneous vaginal delivery low-risk parturient and healthy neonates in Moi Teaching and Referral\nHospital, Eldoret, Kenya.Methods: A randomized controlled trial study design was employed. 744 mother-child dyads wererecruited into this study within the first hour postdelivery and were randomized into two groups: theintervention arm was those discharged within 24 hours and the control arm was those discharged after24 hours or more. The study participants were followed up over three months with over-the-phoneinterviews. The primary outcome was maternal rehospitalization.Results: Between July 2022 and October 2022, 744 mother-baby dyads were recruited and 372 wererandomly assigned to the intervention arm, and 372 to the control arm. There were 23 mothers in theintervention arm and 22 in the control arm who were lost to follow-up and subsequently excluded fromthe analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between the study groups. There were 17 (4.9%)maternal readmissions in the intervention arm and 10 (2.9%) in the control arm (RR 2% (95%CI:-1.1%,5.2%; p-value=0.167).Conclusion: Early discharge for low-risk mothers and healthy neonates is noninferior to late discharge,with similar effects on maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and breastfeeding patterns.","PeriodicalId":517202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","volume":"119 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The length of hospital stay after delivery is a major contributor to preventing postpartumcomplications and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Globally, the length of hospital stay afterdelivery has been reducing in recent times. However, there is limited understanding of the safety,outcomes, and complications of early discharge compared with late discharge in low- and middle-incomesettings. Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of early versus late discharge from the hospital for post-spontaneous vaginal delivery low-risk parturient and healthy neonates in Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya.Methods: A randomized controlled trial study design was employed. 744 mother-child dyads wererecruited into this study within the first hour postdelivery and were randomized into two groups: theintervention arm was those discharged within 24 hours and the control arm was those discharged after24 hours or more. The study participants were followed up over three months with over-the-phoneinterviews. The primary outcome was maternal rehospitalization.Results: Between July 2022 and October 2022, 744 mother-baby dyads were recruited and 372 wererandomly assigned to the intervention arm, and 372 to the control arm. There were 23 mothers in theintervention arm and 22 in the control arm who were lost to follow-up and subsequently excluded fromthe analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between the study groups. There were 17 (4.9%)maternal readmissions in the intervention arm and 10 (2.9%) in the control arm (RR 2% (95%CI:-1.1%,5.2%; p-value=0.167).Conclusion: Early discharge for low-risk mothers and healthy neonates is noninferior to late discharge,with similar effects on maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and breastfeeding patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚埃尔多雷特莫伊教学和转诊医院低风险产妇自然阴道分娩后提前出院与延迟出院的对比:随机对照试验。
背景:产后住院时间是预防产后并发症、改善产妇和新生儿预后的主要因素。在全球范围内,产后住院时间近来一直在缩短。然而,在低收入和中等收入国家,人们对提前出院与延迟出院的安全性、结果和并发症的了解还很有限:评估肯尼亚埃尔多雷特莫伊教学和转诊医院的自然阴道分娩后低风险产妇和健康新生儿提前出院与延迟出院的结果:方法:采用随机对照试验研究设计。在分娩后一小时内招募了 744 个母婴二人组,并将其随机分为两组:干预组为 24 小时内出院者,对照组为 24 小时后或更长时间后出院者。研究人员通过电话访谈对参与者进行了为期三个月的随访。主要结果是产妇再次住院:2022 年 7 月至 2022 年 10 月期间,共招募了 744 个母婴二人组,其中 372 人被随机分配到干预组,372 人被随机分配到对照组。干预组和对照组分别有 23 名和 22 名母亲失去了随访机会,随后被排除在分析之外。各研究组的基线特征相似。干预组有 17 名产妇(4.9%)再次入院,对照组有 10 名产妇(2.9%)再次入院(RR 2% (95%CI:-1.1%,5.2%;P 值=0.167):低风险母亲和健康新生儿的早期出院效果并不优于晚期出院,对产妇预后、新生儿预后和母乳喂养模式的影响相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDITORIAL: COVID-19 AND PREGNANCY Health system barriers to access to quality sexual and reproductive health and rights in relation to family planning and contraception Responding to preventable causes of maternal and perinatal deaths in Homabay County Measurement of safe and respectful maternity care in exit interviews following facility childbirth at the Lwala Community Health Centre Enhancing data accuracy and reliability in maternal and child health: MCGL success story
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1