Identification of community fruit tree preference and associated problems in South West Ethiopia

M.T. Asmare, A. Derero, Z. Deresu
{"title":"Identification of community fruit tree preference and associated problems in South West Ethiopia","authors":"M.T. Asmare, A. Derero, Z. Deresu","doi":"10.18619/2072-9146-2024-1-26-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, preferences for fruit trees have fluctuated over time. However, the most desirable attribute of cultivated fruit tree species has not been consistent across all species and locations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine farmers' preferences for fruit tree species and the associated problems they face in four different study sites, categorized by gender and family size. Equal sampling techniques were used in each selected study site, resulting in a total of 120 household heads participating in structured interviews. The data collected was then analyzed using SPSS version 26 software, utilizing the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Across the study sites, a total of fourteen fruit tree species from ten families were found to be preferred. The preference for fruit trees based on gender showed no significant difference among respondents between kebeles per woreda. However, the preference for fruit trees based on family size showed a significant difference between kebeles per woreda. The number of species preferred for their subsistence value was twice as large as those preferred for commercial reasons. The proportions of these preferred species and the percentage of observed problems with fruit trees varied significantly across the studied sites. Of all the interviewed household heads, 70% in Fenika, 36.6% in Kite, 66.6% in Shesheka, and 50% in Kometa kebeles encountered severe problems during fruit tree planting. The most common problems identified were disease or pest infestation, lack of expert support, land availability, knowledge, and access to seedlings. In order to address these issues, it is important to utilize indigenous knowledge and scientifically tested research approaches to alleviate the factors that influence farmers' preferences.","PeriodicalId":23570,"journal":{"name":"Vegetable crops of Russia","volume":"92 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vegetable crops of Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18619/2072-9146-2024-1-26-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, preferences for fruit trees have fluctuated over time. However, the most desirable attribute of cultivated fruit tree species has not been consistent across all species and locations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine farmers' preferences for fruit tree species and the associated problems they face in four different study sites, categorized by gender and family size. Equal sampling techniques were used in each selected study site, resulting in a total of 120 household heads participating in structured interviews. The data collected was then analyzed using SPSS version 26 software, utilizing the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Across the study sites, a total of fourteen fruit tree species from ten families were found to be preferred. The preference for fruit trees based on gender showed no significant difference among respondents between kebeles per woreda. However, the preference for fruit trees based on family size showed a significant difference between kebeles per woreda. The number of species preferred for their subsistence value was twice as large as those preferred for commercial reasons. The proportions of these preferred species and the percentage of observed problems with fruit trees varied significantly across the studied sites. Of all the interviewed household heads, 70% in Fenika, 36.6% in Kite, 66.6% in Shesheka, and 50% in Kometa kebeles encountered severe problems during fruit tree planting. The most common problems identified were disease or pest infestation, lack of expert support, land availability, knowledge, and access to seedlings. In order to address these issues, it is important to utilize indigenous knowledge and scientifically tested research approaches to alleviate the factors that influence farmers' preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定埃塞俄比亚西南部社区对果树的偏好及相关问题
在全球范围内,人们对果树的偏好随着时间的推移而波动。然而,栽培果树品种的最理想属性在所有品种和地点并不一致。因此,本研究的目的是在四个不同的研究地点,按性别和家庭规模分类,确定农民对果树品种的偏好以及他们面临的相关问题。每个选定的研究地点都采用了平等抽样技术,共有 120 位户主参加了结构化访谈。收集到的数据随后使用 SPSS 26 版软件进行分析,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。研究发现,在所有研究地点,共有 10 个家族的 14 种果树受到青睐。受访者对果树的偏好因性别而异,在每个县的不同村落之间没有明显差异。然而,根据家庭人口对果树的偏好程度,每个区的不同村庄之间存在显著差异。因生计价值而偏好的果树品种数量是因商业原因而偏好的果树品种数量的两倍。这些首选品种的比例和观察到的果树问题的比例在研究地点之间存在显著差异。在所有受访户主中,菲尼卡有 70%、凯特有 36.6%、谢谢卡有 66.6%、科米塔有 50%的户主在果树种植过程中遇到了严重问题。最常见的问题是病虫害、缺乏专家支持、土地供应、知识和树苗供应。为了解决这些问题,必须利用本土知识和经过科学检验的研究方法来减轻影响农民喜好的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological features of Oenothera tetragona Roth. in the conditions of culture in the Non-Chernozem zone of Russia Assessment of the resistance of inbred table beet lines to cercosporosis (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) in field and laboratory conditions The Role of Agroforestry in Ecosystem Services and Mitigation of Climate Change The effect of mycoses on sowing qualities of Sage seeds (Salvia officinalis L.) in the Non-Chernozem soil zone of the Russian Federation Effect of additional inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum on vegetable pea plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1