Window dressing: Changes in atmospheric pollution at boundaries in response to regional environmental policy in China

IF 5.5 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102948
Liyuan Cui , Zeyu Chen , Yanfen Huang , Huayi Yu
{"title":"Window dressing: Changes in atmospheric pollution at boundaries in response to regional environmental policy in China","authors":"Liyuan Cui ,&nbsp;Zeyu Chen ,&nbsp;Yanfen Huang ,&nbsp;Huayi Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In decentralized environmental governance, local governments are likely to adopt the “beggar-thy-neighbor” strategy to relax regulations at boundaries. This study investigates the impact of China's Joint Atmospheric Prevention and Control Policy (JAPCP) in “2 + 26” cities enforced by the central government on pollution at provincial boundaries. The theoretical model suggests that dual incentives for environmental protection and economic growth may prompt local governments to reduce boundary pollution within the JAPCP-covered area while relocating pollution to uncovered boundaries. Based on Shandong Province data using the difference-in-differences approach, our analysis reveals a 9.6% decline in the air quality at JAPCP-covered boundaries compared to non-boundary areas and a 5.3% increase at JAPCP-uncovered boundaries, which is associated with migration of key regulated industries. Through examining annual work reports, we provide evidence that local governments modify regulatory intensity at various boundaries. These findings indicate that, while regional environmental policies are intended to promote inter-jurisdictional cooperation, the local government responses lead to unintended costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069624000226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In decentralized environmental governance, local governments are likely to adopt the “beggar-thy-neighbor” strategy to relax regulations at boundaries. This study investigates the impact of China's Joint Atmospheric Prevention and Control Policy (JAPCP) in “2 + 26” cities enforced by the central government on pollution at provincial boundaries. The theoretical model suggests that dual incentives for environmental protection and economic growth may prompt local governments to reduce boundary pollution within the JAPCP-covered area while relocating pollution to uncovered boundaries. Based on Shandong Province data using the difference-in-differences approach, our analysis reveals a 9.6% decline in the air quality at JAPCP-covered boundaries compared to non-boundary areas and a 5.3% increase at JAPCP-uncovered boundaries, which is associated with migration of key regulated industries. Through examining annual work reports, we provide evidence that local governments modify regulatory intensity at various boundaries. These findings indicate that, while regional environmental policies are intended to promote inter-jurisdictional cooperation, the local government responses lead to unintended costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
橱窗装饰:边界大气污染变化对中国区域环境政策的影响
在分权式环境治理中,地方政府很可能会采取 "以邻为壑 "的策略,放松对边界地区的监管。本研究探讨了中央政府在 "2+26 "城市实施的大气联防联控政策(JAPCP)对省界污染的影响。理论模型表明,环境保护和经济增长的双重激励可能会促使地方政府减少 JAPCP 覆盖区域内的边界污染,同时将污染转移到未覆盖的边界。基于山东省的数据,我们采用差分法进行了分析,结果显示,与非边界地区相比,JAPCP 覆盖区边界的空气质量下降了 9.6%,而 JAPCP 未覆盖区边界的空气质量上升了 5.3%,这与重点监管行业的迁移有关。通过研究年度工作报告,我们提供了地方政府在不同边界修改监管强度的证据。这些研究结果表明,尽管区域环境政策旨在促进辖区间合作,但地方政府的应对措施却导致了意想不到的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to specific natural resources and environmental issues. For consideration, papers should (1) contain a substantial element embodying the linkage between economic systems and environmental and natural resources systems or (2) be of substantial importance in understanding the management and/or social control of the economy in its relations with the natural environment. Although the general orientation of the journal is toward economics, interdisciplinary papers by researchers in other fields of interest to resource and environmental economists will be welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Rainwater shocks and economic growth: The role of the water cycle partition Paying income tax after a natural disaster Editorial Board Correcting misperceptions about trends and norms to address weak collective action — Experimental evidence from a recycling program Environmental regulation and intermediate imports: Firm-product-level evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1