Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach

James W. Middleton, Mohit Arora, K. A. S. Jerram, John Bourke, Melissa McCormick, Dimity O’Leary, Gerard Weber, Tony Lembke, Ashley Craig
{"title":"Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach","authors":"James W. Middleton, Mohit Arora, K. A. S. Jerram, John Bourke, Melissa McCormick, Dimity O’Leary, Gerard Weber, Tony Lembke, Ashley Craig","doi":"10.46292/sci23-00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n There is a lack of consumer-friendly tools to empower and support people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) to self-manage complex health needs in community. This article describes the co-design process of the new SCI Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT).\n \n \n \n Co-design of the SCI-HMT using a mixed-methods approach included a rapid review, e-Delphi surveys with range of multidisciplinary health care professionals (n = 62), interviews of participants with SCI (n = 18) and general practitioners (n = 4), focus groups (n = 3 with 7, 4, and 4 participants with SCI, respectively), design workshops with stakeholders (n = 11, 8), and end-user testing (n = 41).\n \n \n \n The SCI-HMT (healthmaintenancetool.com) was developed based on participatory research with data synthesis from multiple sources. Five priority health maintenance issues for bladder, bowel, skin, pain, and autonomic dysreflexia were originally covered. Best practice recommendations, red flag conditions, referrals, and clinical pathways were agreed on through an e-Delphi technique. Qualitative analysis identified six broad key concepts for self-management, including early symptom recognition, role of SCI peers, knowledge sharing with primary care, general practitioners as gatekeepers, and shared decision-making and highlighted a need to place much stronger emphasis on mental health and well-being. Design workshops and end-user testing provided key insights about user experience, functionality, and content for the SCI-HMT.\n \n \n \n The co-design process engaging end users, including people with SCI and general practitioners, enabled a shared understanding of the problem and identification of important needs and how to meet them. Informed by this process, the SCI-HMT is a freely accessible resource supporting SCI self-management, shared decision-making, and early problem identification.\n","PeriodicalId":507086,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a lack of consumer-friendly tools to empower and support people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) to self-manage complex health needs in community. This article describes the co-design process of the new SCI Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT). Co-design of the SCI-HMT using a mixed-methods approach included a rapid review, e-Delphi surveys with range of multidisciplinary health care professionals (n = 62), interviews of participants with SCI (n = 18) and general practitioners (n = 4), focus groups (n = 3 with 7, 4, and 4 participants with SCI, respectively), design workshops with stakeholders (n = 11, 8), and end-user testing (n = 41). The SCI-HMT (healthmaintenancetool.com) was developed based on participatory research with data synthesis from multiple sources. Five priority health maintenance issues for bladder, bowel, skin, pain, and autonomic dysreflexia were originally covered. Best practice recommendations, red flag conditions, referrals, and clinical pathways were agreed on through an e-Delphi technique. Qualitative analysis identified six broad key concepts for self-management, including early symptom recognition, role of SCI peers, knowledge sharing with primary care, general practitioners as gatekeepers, and shared decision-making and highlighted a need to place much stronger emphasis on mental health and well-being. Design workshops and end-user testing provided key insights about user experience, functionality, and content for the SCI-HMT. The co-design process engaging end users, including people with SCI and general practitioners, enabled a shared understanding of the problem and identification of important needs and how to meet them. Informed by this process, the SCI-HMT is a freely accessible resource supporting SCI self-management, shared decision-making, and early problem identification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同设计脊髓损伤健康维护工具以支持自我管理:混合方法
目前缺乏方便消费者使用的工具来帮助和支持脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在社区内自我管理复杂的健康需求。本文介绍了新的脊髓损伤健康维护工具(SCI-HMT)的共同设计过程。 SCI-HMT的共同设计采用了混合方法,包括快速审查、对多学科医护专业人员进行的电子德尔菲调查(n = 62)、对SCI参与者(n = 18)和全科医生(n = 4)进行的访谈、焦点小组(n = 3,分别有7、4和4名SCI参与者参加)、与利益相关者进行的设计研讨会(n = 11、8)以及最终用户测试(n = 41)。 SCI-HMT (healthmaintenancetool.com)是在参与式研究的基础上,综合多种来源的数据而开发的。最初涵盖了膀胱、肠道、皮肤、疼痛和自主神经反射障碍等五个重点健康维护问题。通过电子德尔菲(e-Delphi)技术,就最佳实践建议、红旗条件、转诊和临床路径达成了一致意见。定性分析确定了自我管理的六大关键概念,包括早期症状识别、SCI 同伴的作用、与初级保健共享知识、全科医生把关、共同决策,并强调需要更加重视心理健康和幸福感。设计研讨会和最终用户测试为 SCI-HMT 的用户体验、功能和内容提供了重要见解。 最终用户(包括 SCI 患者和全科医师)参与的共同设计过程促成了对问题的共同理解,并确定了重要需求以及如何满足这些需求。在这一过程的启发下,SCI-HMT 成为一种可免费获取的资源,支持 SCI 自我管理、共同决策和早期问题识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accessing Rehabilitation after Upper Limb Reconstructive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Study How Can We Treat If We Do Not Measure: A Systematic Review of Neurogenic Bowel Objective Measures Are Clinical Prediction Rules Used in Spinal Cord Injury Care? A Survey of Practice Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach Self-Reported Prescription Opioid Use Among Participants with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1